Advertisement

The Multi-Layered Legal Information Perspective

  • Guido Boella
  • PierCarlo Rossi
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 1)

Abstract

  This paper tries to lay the basis for a procedural model that could contribute to improve the interoperability of legal ontologies. At the same time it focuses on critical points of current use of legal ontologies due to the fact that often the practice of law is disregarded.

Keywords

Legal Rule Knowledge Model Legal Process Legal Knowledge Legal Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ajani, G., L. Lesmo, G. Boella, A. Mazzei, P. Rossi (2007). Terminological and Ontological Analysis of European Directives: Multilinguism in Law. In The 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference ICAIL’07, 43–48. ACM 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Ajani, G., G. Boella, L. Lesmo, M. Martin, A. Mazzei, D. Radicioni, P. Rossi (2010). Multilevel Legal Ontologies. In E. Francesconi, S. Montemagni, W. Peters, D. Tiscornia (Eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts: Where the Language of Law Meets the Law of Language. LNCS 6036, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamins, V.R., J. Contreras, M. Blázquez, L. Rodrigo, P. Casanovas, M. Poblet (2004). The SEKT Legal Use Case Components: Ontology and Architecture. In T. Gordon (Ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 69–77.Google Scholar
  4. Breuker, J., R. Winkels (2003). Use and Reuse of Legal Ontologies in Knowledge Engineering and Information Management. In ICAIL 2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based Legal Information Management, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Gangemi, A., A. Prisco, M.T. Sagri, G. Steve, D. Tiscornia (2003). Some Ontological Tools to Support Legal Regulatory Compliance, With A Case Study. In Workshop WORM Core. LNCS, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Gruber, T. (1995). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 1995; 43(5–6): 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guarino, N. (1998). Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In Proceedings of FOIS’98. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998, 3–15.Google Scholar
  8. McCarty, L.T. (1989). A Language for Legal Discourse, I. Basic Features. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Vancouver, Canada, 180–189.Google Scholar
  9. Rossi, P., C. Vogel (2004). Terms and Concepts (2004). Towards a Syllabus for European Private Law. ERPL, 293–300.Google Scholar
  10. Shaheed, J., A. Yip, J. Cunningham (2005). A Top-Level Language-Biased Legal Ontology. In J. Lehmann, et al. (Eds.) LOAIT—Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Bologna 2005, IAAIL Workshop Series No 4, Bologna 2005, 13–24.Google Scholar
  11. Valente, A. (1995). Legal Knowledge Engineering: A Modelling Approach. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. Valente, A. (2005). Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies. In LNCS 3369/2005, 65–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Studi per l’Impresa e il TerritorioUniversità del Piemonte OrientaleTerritorioItaly

Personalised recommendations