Advertisement

Social Ontology and Documentality

  • Maurizio Ferraris
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 1)

Abstract

Social objects exist, the proof being the difference between thinking to promise something, and actually promising something: once you give your word, the promise keeps on existing, even in case you forget about it, or—as more frequently happens—you change your mind. The first aim of this article is to expand on the nature of social objects, as contrasted with physical and ideal objects, and to spell out the steps that lead to their discovery. Secondly, I will illustrate and criticize the major contemporary theory on social objects, John Searle’s theory, and compare it with another theory, according to which social objects are a kind of inscription. Lastly, I want show how, from this standpoint, a social ontology evolves naturally into a theory of documents, which I propose to name “documentality”.

Keywords

Physical Object Ideal Object Social Object Physical Substrate Social Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bratman, M.E. (1992). Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review, 101: 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (1967). De la grammatologie, Ed. de Minuti, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1971). Signature, événement, contexte, poi in Id., Marges de la philosophie, ed. de Minuit 1972, Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1977). Limited Inc.: Abc. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  6. De Soto, H. (2000). The Mistery of Capital. Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Every Where Else. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Di Lucia, P. (Ed.) (2003). Ontologia Sociale. Potere deontico e regole costitutive. Quodlibet, Macerata.Google Scholar
  8. Ferraris, M. (2003a). Introduzione a Derrida. Roma-Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
  9. Ferraris, M. (2003b). Oggetti Sociali. Sistemi Intelligenti, XV(3): 441–466.Google Scholar
  10. Ferraris, M. (2005) Dove sei? Ontologia del telefonino. Bompiani, Milano.Google Scholar
  11. Ferraris, M. (2006). Jackie Derrida. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, M. (1993). Group Membership and Political Obligation. The Monist, 76: 119–131.Google Scholar
  14. Johansson, I. (1989). Ontological Investigations. An Inquiry into the Categories of Nature, Man and Society. Routledge, London; 2a ed. Frankfurt: M. Ontos-Verlag 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, J., E. Sosa (1999). (Eds.) Metaphysics: An Anthology. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Koepsell, D.R. (2000). The Ontology of Cyberspace. La Salle, Open Court.Google Scholar
  17. Koepsell, D.R. (2003). Libri e altre macchine: artificio ed espressione. In R. Casati (Ed.). 429–439.Google Scholar
  18. Koepsell, D.R., L.S. Moss (Eds.) (2003).John Searle’s Ideas About Social Reality, monography. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62: 285–309.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, M.S. (2002). Legal Reality: A Naturalist Approach To Legal Ontology. Law and Philosophy, 21: 619–705.Google Scholar
  20. Mulligan, K. (1987). (Ed.) Speech Act and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology, Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  21. Ong, W.J. (1982). Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. Methuen, London/New York, NY.Google Scholar
  22. Reid, Th. (1785), Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind, in Id., Philosophical Works, 1967. Olms, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
  23. Reinach, A. (1913). Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Recht. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und philosophische Forschung, 1: 685–847.Google Scholar
  24. Rodotà, S. (2006). La vita e le regole. Hildesheim, Milano.Google Scholar
  25. Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Searle, J.R. (1975). A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Searle, J.R. (1977). Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida, Glyph, I: 172–208.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, J.R. (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Searle, J.R. (1983). Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY/Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  30. Searle, J.R. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Bradford Books, Montgomery, VT.Google Scholar
  31. Searle, J.R. (1993a). Rationality and Realism, What is at Stake ? Daedalus, 122(4): 55–83.Google Scholar
  32. Searle, J.R. (1993b). The World Turned Upside Down, and Reply to Mackey. In G.B. Madison (Ed.) Working Through Derrida. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, 170–188 and 184–188.Google Scholar
  33. Searle, J.R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. In New York, Free Press. The Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Searle, J.R. (1998).Postmodernism and Truth. TWP BE (a journal of ideas), 13: 85–87.Google Scholar
  35. Searle, J.R. (1999). Mind, Language and Society. Philosophy in the Real World. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, B. (1998). Ontologie des Mesokosmos: Soziale Objekte und Umwelten. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 52: 521–540.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, B. (1999). Les objets sociaux. Philosophiques, 26: 315–347. http://www.erudit.org/erudit/philoso/v26n02/smith2/smith2.htm English version: Social Objects http://wings.buffalo.edu/philosophy/ontology/socobj.htm.
  38. Smith, B. (2002). The Ontology of Social Reality. http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith//articles/searle.PDF, 2002
  39. Smith, B. (2003a). John Searle: From Speech Acts to Social Reality. In J. Searle (Ed.) Id., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, B. (2003b). Un’aporia nella costruzione della realtà sociale. Naturalismo e realismo in John R. Searle. In P. Di Lucia (Ed.) 2003, 137–152.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, B. (2006). “Document Acts”. http://ontology.buffalo.edu/document_ontology/.
  42. Simons, P. (1987). Parts. A Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, MA.Google Scholar
  43. Tomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  44. Tomela, R. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Vico, G.B. (1744). La scienza nuova, in Id., ed., N. Abbagnano, La scienza nuova e altri scritti, Torino, Utet 1952, 247–748.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  47. Williamson, T. (1998). a c. di, Vagueness, fascicolo monografico. The Monist, 81: 193–348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations