Abstract
This chapter considers architecture as a discipline, the role of practice in its academic research, and its potentially transdisciplinary character. Developing an earlier study of theses, we differentiate the plane of traditional academic research from an additional dimension offered by practice. However, we note that generic forms of practice occur in all disciplines and so we further differentiate creative practice as a characteristic of architectural research. We identify a number of strategies adopted by architectural researchers through which they attempt to maintain a link between this novel creative practice and the underlying values of traditional academic research. These form bridging strategies, comparable with Haberli’s definition of interdisciplinary research in which the traditional boundaries persist. But we find in Gibbon’s definition of transdisciplinarity, a glimpse of what we have previously claimed to be a new paradigm in which there is no boundary between the concepts and the practices, and therefore no boundaries between traditional and non-traditional cultures of knowledge.
Photo © Daniela Büchler, 2005
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Biggs, M. A. R. & Büchler, D. (2007). Rigour and practice-based research. Design Issues, 23(3), 62–69.
Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2008a). Architectural practice and academic research. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 20(1), 83–94.
Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2008b). Eight criteria for practice-based research in the creative and cultural industries. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 7(1), 5–18.
Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2009). Supervision in an alternative paradigm [Special Issue]. TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, 6, 1–14. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/index.htm
Biggs, M., & Büchler, D. (2010). Communities, values, conventions and actions. In M. Biggs, & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The routledge companion to research in the arts. (pp. 82–98) London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. London: Polity Press.
Büchler, D., Biggs, M. A. R., & Ståhl, L.-H. (2009). Areas of design practice as an alternative research paradigm. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(2), 327–338. http://ijg.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.154/prod.196
Engeström, Y., Miettinen R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). London: Sage.
Häberli, R., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., & Klein, J. T. (2001). Summary. In J. T. Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholtz & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. Basel: Birkhäuser.
OECD (2002). Frascati manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Arena.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. London: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Swedish Institute (SE) and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (UK) for funding the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biggs, M., Büchler, D. (2011). Transdisciplinarity and New Paradigm Research. In: Doucet, I., Janssens, N. (eds) Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production in Architecture and Urbanism. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0104-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0104-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0103-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0104-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)