Advertisement

Concluding Remarks

  • Peter MittelstaedtEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 169)

Abstract

In the beginning of the present treatise we discussed the observation, that many scientists consider Newton’s classical physics as understandable and intuitive, whereas Modern Physics of the 20th century is estimated as difficult to grasp and unintuitive. This assessment is shared by many physicists and presumably by the majority of philosophers of science. Here, we did not investigate the question, why physicists as well as philosophers accept these statements as true, - simply since we consider both theses as erroneous.

Keywords

Classical Mechanic Special Relativity Modern Physic Classical Physic Classical Mechanics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuhlmann, M. (2000). Processes as objects of quantum field theory. In Faye, J., Scheffler, U., & Urchs, M. (Hrg.), Facts, things and events (vol. 76, pp. s. 365–388). Atlanta, GA: Poznan Studies/Rodopi.Google Scholar
  3. Kuhlmann, M. (2010). The ultimate constituents of the material world. Heusenstamm: Ontos-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Mittelstaedt, P. (2008). Planck’s constant in the light of quantum logic. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 104–113.MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge/Keagan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Vollmer, G. (2000). Was ist Naturalismus? In G. Keil & H. Schnädelbach (Eds.), Naturalismus (pp. 46–67). Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Vollmer, G. (2007). Wie viel Metaphysik brauchen wir? In D. Westerkamp & Avd Lühe (Eds.), Metaphysik und Moderne (pp. 67–81). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  9. Weingartner, P. (2000). Basic questions on truth. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Wheeler, J. A. (1973). From relativity to mutability. In J. Mehra (Ed.), The physicists conception of nature (pp. 202–247). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inst. Theoretische PhysikUniversität KölnKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations