Skip to main content

Commonalities and Contrasts in the Development of Major United States Urban Areas: A Spatial and Temporal Analysis from 1910 to 2000

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Studies in Population ((ISIP,volume 9))

Abstract

Using newly available data, simple measures, and recently developed spatial analysis techniques, this paper addresses the following questions: 1) What are the general patterns of growth and decline in United States urban settlements from early in the twentieth century through 2000? 2) How varied are the patterns found? Do they vary by urban area or by period? 3) For three major metropolises in the United States, is the pattern of growth similar over the entire history of each city? How are they different or similar? Relying upon the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) data for census tracts from 1910 to 2000, this paper uses comparable data to assess patterns of growth in all urban areas with available data in the United States. Findings indicate that cities grew away from their centres in the early decades, but growth was more patterned in Chicago and Los Angeles than in the New York area. Later, growth and decline coexisted in similar zones; by 2000, no patterning was apparent in any of the three major metropolises. Implications are drawn for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. (1961). City size distribution and economic development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. & Pred, A. (1961). Central place studies: A bibliography of theory and applications. Philadelphia: Regional Service Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, D. J. (1950). The structure of the metropolitan community: A study of dominance and subdominance. Ann Arbor, MI: Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, R. D. McKenzie, (Eds.), In The City (reprinted 1967). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1972). How I discovered the theory of central places: A report about the origin of central places. In P. W. English, R. C. Mayfield, (Eds.), Man, space and environment (pp. 601–610). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J. (1984). European urbanization, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, B., Sabagh, G., & Van Arsdol, M., Jr. (1962). Patterns of city growth. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelson, R. (1967). The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850–1930. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (1971). Urban growth and population densities. Demography, 10, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (1975). Population suburbanization in American metropolitan areas, 1940–1970. Geographical Analysis, 7, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (1978). Suburban territorial differentiation. Sociology and Social Research, 62, 523–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (2002). Suburban population growth and decline: The emergence of new patterns in the 1990s. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, May 8–11, 2005, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, D. (2003). Introduction. In D. Halle, (Ed.), New York and Los Angeles: Politics, society and culture: A comparative view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. H. (1981). Human ecology: Persistence and change. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. W. (2000). The new urban studies. Chronicle of Higher Education, August 18: A15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J. K. & Getis, A. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27, 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. (2000). The postmodern city from an early modern perspective. American Historical Review, 105(5), 1668–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnore, L. F. (1957). Metropolitan growth and decentralization. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Scott, E. Soja, (Eds.). (1996). The City: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, K. E. & Taeuber, A. F. (1965). Negroes in cities; Residential segregation and neighborhood change. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1942a). Census Tract Data Files, 1940–1970 (Elizabeth Mullen Bogue Files) Electronic and Special Media Records Services Division Reference Report. Census Tract Data Files Archival Research Catalog (ARC) identifier: 617523 Collection: Records of the Community and Family Study center (CFS), University of Chicago. National Archives and Records Administrion, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1942b). Census Tract Data on Population and Housing, New York City: 1940. Welfare Council Committee on 1940 Census Tract Tabulations for New York City. New York, NY, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2007). Census atlas of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. & Dear, M. (1993). Malign neglect: Homelessness in an American city. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I acknowledge the assistance of Jordan Segall, Ahmed Lacevic and Susan Weber. Comments from Myron Gutmann and anonymous reviews were very helpful. This work was in part supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (0226279, 0618456, and 0647902)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Beveridge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beveridge, A.A. (2011). Commonalities and Contrasts in the Development of Major United States Urban Areas: A Spatial and Temporal Analysis from 1910 to 2000. In: Merchant, E., Deane, G., Gutmann, M., Sylvester, K. (eds) Navigating Time and Space in Population Studies. International Studies in Population, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0068-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics