Abstract
The study addresses the issue of pushover analysis of bridges sensitive to torsion, using as a case-study a straight, overpass bridge with two equal spans, whose fundamental mode is purely torsional. The deck is supported on a single pier consisting of two columns of cylindrical cross-section, monolithically connected to the deck, while it rests on its two abutments through elastomeric bearings. The seismic performance of the bridge was assessed in the longitudinal and transverse directions using non-linear static (pushover) and time-history analysis. An additional pushover analysis was carried out using the fundamental (torsional) mode loading. Parametric analyses were performed involving consideration of foundation compliance, and various scenarios of accidental eccentricity that would trigger the torsional mode. The pushover curves derived in the longitudinal and transverse directions highlight the satisfactory performance of the bridge, even for motions twice as strong as the design earthquake. On the other hand, one of the key points of this study is that, if one focuses on the fundamental torsional mode, the corresponding load pattern is anti-symmetric and the resulting base shear inevitably equal to zero, hence a ‘standard’ pushover curve cannot be drawn. Along these lines, an alternative pushover curve in terms of abutment shear vs. deck maximum displacement (that occurs at the abutment) was found to be a meaningful measure of the overall inelastic response of the bridge. Another interesting aspect is that assessment based on the torsional fundamental mode leads to failure of the elastomeric bearings, although the related displacements are not relevant since they are about an order of magnitude higher than the design displacement. Overall, it can be concluded that for bridges with a fundamental torsional mode, assessment of their seismic response relies on a number of justified important decisions that have to be made regarding the selection and reliable application of the analysis method adopted, the estimation of the foundation and abutment stiffnesses, and the appropriate numerical simulation of the pertinent failure mechanism of the elastomeric bearings used.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Krawinkler H, Seneviratna G (2004) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6):452–464
Isakovic T, Fischinger M (2006) Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 35(1):95–114
Paraskeva TS, Kappos AJ, Sextos AG (2006) Extension of modal pushover to seismic assessment of bridges. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 35(11):1269–1293
Paraskeva TS, Kappos AJ (2010) Further development of a multimodal pushover analysis procedure for seismic assessment of bridges. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 39 (2):211–222
Ministry of Public Works of Greece. Greek Seismic Code – EAK 2000 (amended June 2003), Athens, 2000 (in Greek)
Ministry of Environment, Regional Planning, and Public Works, Circular 39/99: Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Bridges (1999) Athens (in Greek)
Computers and Structures Inc. SAP2000 Nonlinear Version 10 (2005) User’s reference manual, Berkeley, CA
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) Eurocode 8 (2005) Design provisions of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 2: Bridges (EN1998-2), CEN Brussels
Mylonakis G, Nikolaou S, Gazetas G (2006) Footings under seismic loading: analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations. Soil Dyn Earth Eng 26(9):824–853
Naeim F, Kelly J M (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures, from theory to practice. Wiley, New York
Kappos AJ (1993) RCCOLA-90: a microcomputer program for the analysis of the inelastic response of reinforced concrete sections, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Kappos AJ, Paraskeva TS (2008) Nonlinear static analysis of bridges accounting for higher mode effects. Nonlinear Static Methods for Design/Assessment of 3D Structures, Lisbon, Portugal
Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. Wiley, New York
Sextos A, Pitilakis K, Kappos A (2003) Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: methodology and analytical tools. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 32(4):607–627
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kappos, A.J., Goutzika, E.D., Stefanidou, S.P., Sextos, A.G. (2011). Problems in Pushover Analysis of Bridges Sensitive to Torsion. In: Papadrakakis, M., Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N. (eds) Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0053-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0053-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0052-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0053-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)