Skip to main content

Use of Analytical Tools for Calibration of Parameters in P25 Preliminary Assessment Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 21))

  • 2508 Accesses

Abstract

There exist several vulnerability assessment procedures including code-based detailed analysis methods as well as preliminary assessment techniques which are based on inspection and experience to identify the safety levels of buildings. Various parameters affect the seismic behaviour of buildings, such as dimensions and lay-out of structural members, existence of structural irregularities, presence of soft story or/and weak story, short columns and pounding effects, construction and the workmanship quality, soil conditions, etc. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of four essential structural parameters on the seismic behaviour of existing RC structures by using the most updated analytical tools. The effect of the concrete quality, corrosion effects, short columns and vertical irregularities have been examined. Parametric studies have been carried out on case study real buildings extracted from the Turkish building stock, one of which was totally collapsed in Kocaeli Earthquake of 1999. A control building has been considered for each sample structure with ideal parameters (i.e. without vertical irregularity or good quality of concrete, etc.). Nonlinear static push-over and cyclic analyses have been performed on 2D and 3D models. Base shear versus top displacement curves are obtained for each building in two orthogonal directions. Comparisons have been made in terms of shear strength, energy dissipation capability and ductility. The mean values of the drop in the performance are computed and factors are suggested to be utilized in preliminary assessment techniques, such as the recently proposed P25 method which is shortly summarized in this Chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. BU-ARC (2002) Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area. Project Report, Boğaziçi University and American Red Cross, Boğaziçi University Publications, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akçay B, Önen YH, Öztekin E (2001) Definition of the concrete characteristics on structures in Istanbul (in Turkish). 16th Turkish Technical Congress and Seminar of Civil Engineering, 1–3 November, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bresler B (1997) Evaluation of earthquake safety of existing buildings: developing methodologies for evaluating the earthquake safety of existing buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Research Center, University of California, UCB/EERC77/06, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biskinis DE, Roupakias GK, Fardis MN (2004) Degradation of shear strength of reinforced concrete members with inelastic cyclic displacements. ACI Struct J 76(101):773–783

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carr AJ (2008) Ruaumoko2D – a program for inelastic time-history analysis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  6. Celep Z, Kumbasar N (2004) Introduction to the earthquake engineering and earthquake resistant design, 3rd edn. Beta Dagitim, Istanbul (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  7. FEMA 154 (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. FEMA 154 (2002) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook, 2nd edn. Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan AF, Sözen MA (1997) Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes ACI Struct J 94(1):31–39

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ohkubo M (1990) The method for evaluating seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Seminar in Structural Engineering, Department of AMES, University of California, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boduroğlu H, Özdemir P, İlki A, Şirin S, Demir C, Baysan F (2004) Towards a modified rapid screening method for existing medium rise RC buildings in Turkey. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper 1452, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bal IE (2005) Rapid assessment techniques for collapse vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings (in Turkish). MSc thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Department

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bal IE, Crowley H, Pinho R (2008a) Displacement-based earthquake loss assessment for an earthquake scenario in Istanbul. J Earthquake Eng 12(S2):12–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bal IE, Crowley H, Pinho R, Gülay G (2008b) Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 28(10–11): 914–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bal IE, Gülay FG, Tezcan SS (2008c) A new approach for the preliminary seismic assessment of RC buildings: P25 Scoring Method. 14th WCEE, Beijing, China, paper 09-01-121, October, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  16. Öztekin E, Suvakçı A (1994) Concrete classification in Istanbul for buildings which ready mix concrete is used (in Turkish). Proceedings of the 3rd National Concrete Congress of Concrete, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gülay FG, Bal IE, Gökçe T (2008a) Correlation between detailed and preliminary assessment techniques in the light of real damage states. J Earthquake Eng 12(S2):129–139

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gülay FG, Bal İE, Tezcan SS (2008b) Calibration of the P25 Scoring Method developed for the seismic safety of reinforced concrete buildings and its application on a pilot region (in Turkish). Final Report, Research Project No 106M278, TUBITAK (Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miranda AP, Calvi GM, Pinho R, Priestley MJN (2005) Displacement-based assessment of RC columns with limited shear resistance, technical report. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akyüz S, Uyan M (1993) On the concrete quality of the buildings damaged during 1992 Erzincan earthquake 2nd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 10–23 March, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  21. Antoniou S, and Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure J Earthquake Eng 8:5

    Google Scholar 

  22. SeismoStruct Software (2010) Seismosoft, Version 5.0.3. [available at www.seismosoft.com]

  23. Özturan T (2000) Structural material problems in Istanbul, 2nd Istanbul and Earthquake Symposium, May 27, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tezcan SS, Bal IE, Gülay FG (2009) Risk management and a rapid scoring technique for collapse vulnerability of R/C buildings. In: Ilki A, Karadogan F, Pala S, Yuksel E (eds) Chapter 13, Seismic risk assessment and retrofitting with special emphasis on existing low rise structures. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  25. Başaran V (2006) Comparison of the results obtained by pushover analysis and seismic index method for existing buildings (in Turkish). MSc thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Afyon Kocatepe University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İhsan E. Bal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bal, İ.E., Gülay, F.G., Tezcan, S.S. (2011). Use of Analytical Tools for Calibration of Parameters in P25 Preliminary Assessment Method. In: Papadrakakis, M., Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N. (eds) Computational Methods in Earthquake Engineering. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0053-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0053-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0052-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0053-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics