Advertisement

Optimized Life Using Frequency and Time Domain Approaches

  • J. S. RaoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 1011)

Abstract

Life estimation of mechanical components has been practiced for quite some time. There are two approaches available: (1) use the response in time domain and do a cycle counting and (2) determine the response in frequency domain and use a cumulative damage calculation to cross the resonance. These two methods apparently look different and generally not connected. Here we examine these methods and their applicability in determining life of mechanical components and find their suitability for different applications. We will also discuss their common aspects and state their relative advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords

Lifing Time domain Cycle counting Frequency domain Optimized life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to many of his colleagues who performed variety of lifing and optimization problems in Altair India and in IIT Delhi.

References

  1. 1.
    Wöhler, A.: Versuche űber die Festigkeit der Eisenbahnwagen-Achsen. Zeitschrift fűr Bauwesen (1860)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heywood, R.B.: Designing Against Fatigue. Chapman and Hall (1962)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagci, C.: Fatigue design of machine elements using Bagci line defining the fatigue failure surface line (mean stress diagram). Mechanism and Machine Theory 16, 339 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao, J.S.: Turbomachine Blade Vibration. John Wiley, 1991 and New Age International (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ludwik, P.: Elemente der technologischen mechanik. Springer (1909)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hollomon, J.H.: Tensile deformation. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 162, 268 (1945)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neuber, H.: Theory of stress concentration for shear-strained prismatical bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress-strain law. J. Appl. Mech. 8, 544 (1961)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Topper, T.H., Wetzel, R.M., Morrow, J.D.: Neuber’s rule applied to fatigue of notched specimens. J. Mater. 4(1), 200 (1969)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Impellizzeri, L.F.: Cumulative damage analysis in structural fatigue, effects of environment and complex load history on fatigue life. STP-462, ASTM, 40 (1970)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Socie, D.F., Dowling, N.E., Kurath, P.: Fatigue life estimation of notched members. Proc. 15th Symp. Frac. Mech., STP 833, 284 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basquin, O.H.: The experimental law of endurance tests. Proc. ASTM 10, 625 (1910)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manson, S.S.: Behavior of Materials Under Constant Thermal Stress. Heat Transfer Symposium, University of Michigan, Engineering Research Institute, p. 9 (1953)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coffin, L.F., Jr: A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile material. Trans. ASME 76, 931 (1954)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palmgren, A.: Die lebensdauer von kugellagern. ZVDI 68, 339 (1924)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miner, M.A.: Cumulative damage in fatigue. Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech. 67, A159 (1945)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marco, S.M., Starkey, W.L.: A concept of fatigue damage. Trans. ASME 76, 627 (1954)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao, J.S., Pathak, A., Chawla, A.: Blade life – a comparison by cumulative damage theories. J. Eng. Gas Turb. and Power 123(4), 886 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collins, J.A.: Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design. John Wiley (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rao, J.S.: Turbine Blade Life Estimation. Alpha Science, UK (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dowling, N.E.: Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stress-strain histories. J. Mater. 7(1), 71–87 (1972)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Altair HyperWorks 9.0 Fatigue Process Manager FMPGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rao, J.S., Vyas, N.S., Gupta, K.: Blade damping measurement in a spin rig with nozzle passing excitation simulated by electromagnets. Shock & Vib. Bull. 56(Pt 2), 109 (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao, J.S., Saldanha, A.: Turbomachine blade damping. J. Sound and Vib. 262(3), 731 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lazan, B.J.: Damping of Materials and Members in Structural Mechanics. Pergamon Press (1968)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao, J.S., Gupta, K.: Theory and Practice of Mechanical Vibration. John Wiley (1984)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rao, J.S., Vyas, N.S.: Determination of blade stresses under constant speed and transient conditions with nonlinear damping. J. Eng. Gas Turb. and Power, Trans ASME 118(2), 424 (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rao, J.S., Narayan, R., Ranjith, M.C.: Lifing of Turbomachinery Blades – A Process Driven Approach. GT2008-50231, ASME Turbo Expo 2008, Berlin, Germany, 9–13 June 2008Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rao, J.S., Narayan, R., Ranjith, M.C., Rejin, R.: Blade lifing with material and friction damping. The future of gas turbine technology, 4th International Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 15–16 October 2008Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rao, J.S., Mahadevappa, V., Dey, P., Rajeshwar, B., Kumar, H.: Automotive driveline simulation. International Conference on CAE, IIT, Madras, 13–15 December 2007Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rao, J.S., Narayan, R.: Lifing of Automobile Structures and Drive Trains in Frequency Domain. Automotive Symposium India (ASI), Mumbai, Global Automotive Management Council, Michigan, USA, 4–5 February 2009Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao, J.S., Peraiah, K.C., Singh, U.K.: Estimation of dynamic stresses in last stage steam turbine blades under reverse flow conditions. Advances in Vibration Engineering, J. Vib. Inst. India 8(1), 71 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rao, J.S., Suresh, S.: Blade root shape optimization. The Future of Gas Turbine Technology, 3rd International Conference, Brussels, October (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Altair HyperStudy: User’s Manual v7.0. Troy, MI (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Altair Engineering IndiaBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations