Abstract
Quantum field theory is the study of quantum systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. The simplest quantum field theories are the free bose fields, which are essentially assemblies of an infinite number of coupled oscillators. Examples include the quantized electromagnetic field, lattice vibrations in solid state physics, and the Klein-Gordon field, some of which are relativistic while others are not. Particles show up in quantum field theory as “field quanta.” As we will see, these do not quite have all the properties of the usual particles of Newtonian physics or of Schrödinger quantum mechanics. I will in particular show (Section 3) that the quanta of free bose fields, relativistic or not, can not be perfectly localized in a bounded subset of space. This, in my opinion, shows conclusively that the difficulties encountered when attempting to define a position observable for the field quanta of relativistic fields, that continue to be the source of regular debate in the literature [20] [21] [22] [3] [10] [15] [18] [19] [48] [47], do not find their origin in any form of causality violation, as seems to be generally thought. Instead, they result from an understandable but ill-fated attempt to force too stringent a particle interpretation on the states of the quantum field containing a finite number of quanta.
The nature and properties of the vacuum as well as the meaning and localization properties of one or many particle states have attracted a fair amount of attention and stirred up sometimes heated debate in relativistic quantum field theory over the years. I will review some of the literature on the subject and will then show that these issues arise just as well in non-relativistic theories of extended systems, such as free bose fields. I will argue they should as such not have given rise either to surprise or to controversy. They are in fact the result of the misinterpretation of the vacuum as “empty space” and of a too stringent interpretation of field quanta as point particles. I will in particular present a generalization of an apparently little known theorem of Knight on the non-localizability of field quanta, Licht’s characterization of localized excitations of the vacuum, and explain how the physical consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem on the cyclicity and separability of the vacuum for local observables are already perfectly familiar from non-relativistic systems of coupled oscillators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. Amrein. Localizability for particles of mass zero. Helv. Phys. Acta, 42:149–190, 1969.
H. Bacry. Localizability and space in quantum physics. Lecture Notes in Physics 308, Springer Verlag. 1988.
I. Bialynicki-Birula. Exponential localization of photons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80(24):5247–5250, 1998.
J. D. Björken and S. D. Drell. Relativistic quantum fields. Mc. Graw Hill, NY. 1965.
S. De Bièvre. Classical and quantum harmonic systems (in preparation).
S. De Bièvre. Causality and localization in relativistic quantum mechanics. In Proceedings “Trobades Cientifiques de la Mediterrania”, pages 234–241. 1985.
S. De Bièvre. Local states of free bose fields. In Large Coulomb Systems, volume 695 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pages 17–63. 2006.
V.B. Berestetskii, E.M. Lifshitz, and L.P. Pitaevskii. Relativistic quantum theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1971.
N. N. Bogoliubov and D.V. Shirkov. Quantum fields. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc. 1983.
D. Buchholz and J. Yngvason. There are no causality problems for fermi’s two-atom system. Physical Review Letters 5, 73:613–616, 1994.
S.J. Chang. Introduction to quantum field theory. World Scientific. 1990.
J.P. Dereudinger. Theorie quantique des champs. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. 2001.
W. Driessler. Comments on lightlike translations and applications in relativistic quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys., 44(2): 133–141, 1975.
G. Emch. Algebraic methods in statistical mechanics and quantum field theory. Wiley Interscience, 1972.
G. Fleming and J. Butterfield. Strange positions. In From physics to philosophy, pages 108–165. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
W. Greiner. Relativistic quantum mechanics. Springer. 1990.
R. Haag. Local quantum physics. Springer. 1996.
Hans Halvorson. Reeh-Schlieder defeats Newton-Wigner: on alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory. Philos. Sci., 68(1):111–133, 2001.
Hans Halvorson and Rob Clifton. No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? Philos. Sci., 69(1):1–28, 2002.
G. C. Hegerfeldt. Remark on causality and particle localization. Phys. Rev. D, 10(10):3320–3321, 1974.
G. C. Hegerfeldt. Violation of causality in relativistic quantum theory? Phys. Rev. Letters, 54(22):2395–2398, 1985.
G. C. Hegerfeldt. Causality, particle localization and positivity of the energy. In Irreversibility and causality (Goslar, 1996), volume 504 of Lecture Notes in Phys., pages 238–245. Springer, Berlin, 1998.
K.-E. Hellwig and K. Kraus. Operations and measurements II. Commun. Math. Phys., 16:142–147, 1970.
S. S. Horuzhy. Introduction to algebraic quantum field theory, volume 19 of Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1990.
R. Haag and J. A. Swieca. When does a quantum theory describe particles? Commun. Math. Phys., 1:308–320,1965.
K. Huang. Quantum field theory. J. Wiley and Sons, 1998.
J.M. Knight. Strict localization in quantum field theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2(4):459–471, 1961.
A. L. Licht. Strict localization. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(11): 1443–1447, 1963.
K. Masuda. A unique continuation theorem for solutions of the wave equation with variable coefficients. J. Math. Analysis and Applications, 21:369–376, 1968.
K. Masuda. Anti-locality of the one-half power of elliptic differential operators. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto University, 8:207–210, 1972/73.
F. Mandl and G. Shaw. Quantum field theory. Wiley. 1984.
R.E. Peierls. The development of quantum field theory. In The physicist’s conception of nature, pages 370–379. D. Reidel Publishing Cy., Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1973.
M. Redhead. More ado about nothing. Foundations of Physics 1, 25:123–137, 1995.
H. Reeh and S. Schlieder. Bemerkungen zur Unitäräquivalenz von Lorentzinvarianten Felden. Nuovo cimento (10), 22:1051–1068, 1961.
S. Ruijsenaars. On newton-wigner localization and superluminal propagation speeds. Ann. Physics, 137(l):33–43, 1981.
J.J. Sakurai. Advanced quantum mechanics. Addison Wesley Publishing Company. 1967.
S. S. Schweber. An introduction to relativistic quantum field theory. Row and Peterson and Company, 1961.
J. Schwinger. A report on quantum electrodynamics. In The physicist’s conception of nature, pages 413–429. D. Reidel Publishing Cy., Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1973.
I. E. Segal. Quantum fields and analysis in the solution manifolds of differential equations. In Proc. Conf. on Analysis in Function Space, pages 129–153. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1963.
I. E. Segal and R. W. Goodman. Anti-locality of certain Lorentz-invariant operators. J. Math. Mech., 14:629–638, 1965.
G. Sterman. An introduction to quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
P. Strange. Relativistic quantum mechanics. Cambridge University Press. 1998.
R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman. PCT, spin and statistics and all that. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Cy, Reading MA, 1964.
S. Summers and R. Werner. The vacuum violates Bell’s inequalities. Physics Letters 5, 110A:257–259, 1985.
N. Tisserand. PhD thesis (in preparation).
R. Verch. Anti-locality and a Reeh-Schlieder theorem on manifolds. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 28(2):143–154, 1994.
D. Wallace. Emergence of particles from bosonic quantum field theory. http://arxiv.org preprint 2001, /abs/quant-ph/0112149, 2001.
D. Wallace. In defence of naiveté: The conceptual status of lagrangian quantum field theory. http://arxiv.org preprint 2001, /abs/quant-ph/0112148, 2001.
E. P. Wigner. Interpretation of quantum mechanics. In Quantum theory and measurement, pages 260–314. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Hindustan Book Agency
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Bièvre, S. (2007). Where’s That Quantum?. In: Ali, S.T., Sinha, K.B. (eds) Contributions in Mathematical Physics. Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-93-86279-33-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-93-86279-33-0_5
Publisher Name: Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon
Print ISBN: 978-81-85931-79-1
Online ISBN: 978-93-86279-33-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)