Skip to main content
  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper the Indian Buddhist logic of the Middle Ages is connected to methodological aspects of logic, especially to the idea that logic can serve as an organon, e. g., as a tool for discovering novelties. Research on this idea can be characterized by questions like “Is there a logic of invention?”, “What is the role, if any, of deductive logic in creative processes?”, “What is the role of logic in philosophy of science, especially in a philosophy of science which takes the context of discovery into account?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vijay Bharadwaja. Form and Validity in Indian Logic. Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bocheński, J. Formale Logik. Karl Alber, 1956. (Orbis Academicus; 2).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bocheński, J. “The Indian Variety of Logic”. In A History of Formal Logic translated by Ivo Thomas, 2nd ed., pages 416–447. Chelsea, New York, 1961. reprinted in Ganeri (ed.) 2001, 117–150.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Chi, Richard S. Buddhist Formal Logic: A Study of Dignāga’s Het-ucakra and K’uei-chi’s Great Commentary on the Nyāyapravesa. The Royal Asiatic Socity of Great Britain, 1969. Motilal Banarasidass: New Delhi 21974, reprinted 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erich Frauwallner. “Dignāga, sein Werk und seine Entwicklung,”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens, 3:83–164, 1959. reprinted in Erich Frauwallner, Kleine Schriften, ed. Gerhard Oberhammer/Ernst Steinkellner, Franz Steiner Verlag: Wiesbaden 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonardan Ganeri, editor. Indian Logic. A Reader, Richmond, Surrey, 2001.Curzon.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonardan Ganeri. “Introduction: Indian Logic and the Colonization of Reason”. In Indian Logic. A Reader

    Google Scholar 

  8. , pages 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klaus Glashoff. “Das Rad der Gründe—Der Hetucakradamaru von Dignaga”. Mitteilungen der Mathematischen Gesellschaft Hamburg, 18, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander Jones, editor. Pappus of Alexandria- Book 7 of the Collection, vol. 1, volume 8 of Sources in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Springer, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bimal Krishna Matilal. The Character of Logic in India. Suny Series in Indian Thought, Texts and Studies, (Ganeri Jonardan and Heeraman Tiwari, editors). State University of New York Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bimal Krishna Matilal. “Introducing Indian Logic”. In Ganeri [Gan01a], pages 183–215. First published in [Mat98], 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karl Potter. “Introduction to the Philosophy of Nyāya-Vaisesika,”. In Karl Potter, editor, Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya-Vaisesika up to Gangesa, pages 1–208. Princetion University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Rāndle, H. A note on the indian syllogism. Mind, 33:398–414, 1924. Reprinted in [Gan01a], 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Randle, H.’ Indian Logic in the Early Schools: A Study of the Nyāyadarsana in its Relation to Early Logic of other Schools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1930. Reprinted Oriental Books Reprint Corporation: New Delhi 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stanislaw Schayer. “Studien zur Indischen Logik. 1. Der Indische und der Aristotelische Syllogismus. 2: Altindische Antizipationen der Aussagenlogik”. Krakow, 1932. nos. 4–6, 98–102 (1932), nos. 1–6,90–96 (1933); English translation in [Gan01a], 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stanislaw Schayer. “Über die Methode der Nyāya-forschung”. In Festschrift für Moritz Winternitz, pages 247–257. 1933. English translation in [Gan01a], 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lambert Schmithausen. “A Further Note on Hetucakradamaru 8–9”. Journal of Indian Logic, 27:79–82,1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Th. Stcherbatsky. Buddhist Logic, vol. 1. Academy of Science of the USSR, Leningrad, 1932. (Bibliotheca Buddica; vol. XXVI, pt. 1), 132. Reprinted Mouton & Co.: ‘s-Gravenhage 1958 (Indo-Iranian Reprints; IV).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Satis Chandra Vidyabhusana. A History of Indian Logic. Ancient, Medieval and Modern schools. Calcutta, 1920. Reprinted Motilal Banar-sidass: Delhi etc. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Hindustan Book Agency

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peckhaus, V. (2004). Dignāga’s Logic of Invention. In: Grattan-Guinness, I., Yadav, B.S. (eds) History of the Mathematical Sciences. Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-93-86279-16-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics