Abstract
Despite the advantages that the use of Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) technology entails, privacy stemming from its mass deployment causes concern both in society and the academic community. Although non-implantable passive RFID devices in general remain more advanced than implantable, glass capsule types, both generally have fundamental technological limitations that mean they are susceptible to similar issues. Indeed, the security and privacy implications of RFID for a variety of applications have been well explored; however, the use of them inside the body serves to further aggravate some of the known issues. Whilst the numbers of people with such implanted devices are still small, the commercialisation of this technology means that they could become commonplace and so these concerns are paramount. In this chapter, these issues are described, and it is argued that controls and measures can be developed and engineered now in order to minimise such risks. In addition, the medical risks specific to implantation of these devices is explored in light of recent research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Halamka et al. 2006, p 699.
- 2.
“Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Implantable Radiofrequency Transponder System for Patient Identification and Health Information.” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, December 10, 2004.
- 3.
Studies on larger population indicated a lower percentage (1% among over 4,200 mice, while 10% among 177 mice).
- 4.
Wustenberg 2007.
- 5.
Albrecht 2007.
- 6.
Stajano and Anderson 1999.
- 7.
Juels et al. 2003.
- 8.
Rieback et al. 2005.
- 9.
- 10.
“Privacy Impact Assessment Framework for RFID applications” available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/rfid/index_en.htm
- 11.
European Commission 2009.
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/rfid/documents/recommendationonrfid2009.pdf
References
Albrecht K (ed) (2007) Microchip-induced tumors in laboratory rodents and dogs: a review of the literature 1990–2006. http://www.antichips.com/cancer. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
Garfinkel SL (2002) An RFID bill of rights. Technol Rev 150(8): October
Halamka J, Juels A, Stubblefield A, Westhues J (2006) The security implications of VeriChip cloning. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:699–707
Juels A, Brainard JG (2004) Soft blocking: flexible blocker tags on the cheap. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society, pp 1–7
Juels A, Rivest RL, Szydlo M (2003) The blocker tag: selective blocking of RFID tags for consumer privacy. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pp 103–111
Rieback M, Crispo B, Tanenbaum AS (2005) Keep on blockin in the free world: personal access control for low-cost RFID tags. Security Protocols Workshop, pp 51–59
Stajano F, Anderson RJ (1999) the resurrecting duckling: security issues for Ad-hoc wireless networks, Security Protocols Workshop, pp 172–194
Wustenberg W (2007) Effective carcinogenicity assessment of permanent implantable medical devices: lessons from 60 years of research comparing rodents with other species
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rotter, P., Daskala, B., Compañó, R. (2012). Passive Human ICT Implants: Risks and Possible Solutions. In: Gasson, M., Kosta, E., Bowman, D. (eds) Human ICT Implants: Technical, Legal and Ethical Considerations. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 23. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-870-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-870-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands
Print ISBN: 978-90-6704-869-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-6704-870-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)