Skip to main content

The Mottled Legacy of 9/11: A Few Reflections on the Evolution of the International Law of Armed Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2011 - Volume 14

Part of the book series: Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law ((YIHL,volume 14))

  • 1338 Accesses

Abstract

Has the way the law evolved since 9/11 been an unqualified good? Some might think so. Undoubtedly, there have been many positive developments in international law in general, and the international law of armed conflict (ILOAC) in specific. Certainly those disposed towards the peaceful resolution of disputes and the efficacy of international law are heartened by recent studies that show, rather counterintuitively, that violence, and especially interstate violence, is actually declining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This essay will use the term “international law of armed conflict” (ILOAC) in lieu of the appellations “law of war” (LOAC) and “international humanitarian law” (IHL), both of which are, in this writer’s view, too inexact and subject to misinterpretation. “Law of war” inevitably involves thorny questions of “what is ‘war’?” variety even in situations where discussants agree that there is an “armed conflict.” Like many Americans, this writer views the term “international humanitarian law” as one that dangerously seems to suggest that conflicts can somehow be made more humane that reality would permit. What is more is that it can too easily be conflated with “international human rights law” which is, of course, a very distinct legal regime.

  2. 2.

    Goldstein 2011.

  3. 3.

    Dunlap 2001.

  4. 4.

    Dunlap 2010.

  5. 5.

    Kudo 2012.

  6. 6.

    Reisman and Antoniou 1994, p. xxiv.

  7. 7.

    DoD 2009 .

  8. 8.

    Associated Press 2007.

  9. 9.

    Constable 2008, p. A12.

  10. 10.

    Goldstone 2011.

  11. 11.

    Alston 2010, p. 25.

  12. 12.

    Reuters 2011.

  13. 13.

    United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan 2011.

  14. 14.

    Moore forthcoming 2012.

  15. 15.

    Shanker 2008.

  16. 16.

    Air Force 2009.

  17. 17.

    Shanker 2008 .

  18. 18.

    Winik 2003.

  19. 19.

    Rapp and Koh 2010.

  20. 20.

    Department of State 2003.

  21. 21.

    Savage 2012.

  22. 22.

    Associated Press 2008.

  23. 23.

    Perry 2008.

  24. 24.

    Chivers 2012.

  25. 25.

    Grillo 2011.

  26. 26.

    Pomfret 1999, p. A-1.

  27. 27.

    DoD 2011.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles J. Dunlap Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, and the author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunlap, C.J. (2012). The Mottled Legacy of 9/11: A Few Reflections on the Evolution of the International Law of Armed Conflict. In: Schmitt, M., Arimatsu, L. (eds) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2011 - Volume 14. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, vol 14. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-855-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships