Skip to main content

Fairness, Openness and the Specific Nature of Sport: Does the Lisbon Treaty Change EU Sports Law?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lex Sportiva: What is Sports Law?

Part of the book series: ASSER International Sports Law Series ((ASSER))

Abstract

Using two small-scale case studies, concerning fairness and openness, the paper shows how the Lisbon reforms offer the possibility of driving EU sports law according to new guiding principles of interpretation. In judging whether change is helpful, much rests on one’s perception of whether EU law was truly inattentive of sport’s special character in the first place.

Previously published in: The International Sports Law Journal (ISLJ) 2010/3–4, pp. 11 and 14–17, paper presented during the LexSportiva Conference at Pelita Harapan Universitas (UPH), on 22 September 2010 in Jakarta, Indonesia, organised in collaboration with the Indonesia Lex Sportiva Instituta and with the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia, the National Olympic Committee, the T.M.C. Asser Instituut and the Indonesian football league.

Somerville College and Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cases C-51/96 & C-191/97 Deliege v Ligue de Judo [2000] ECR I-2549 paras 41−42; Case C-176/96 Lehtonen et al. v FRSB [2000] ECR I-2681 paras. 32−33.

  2. 2.

    CONV 375/1/02, http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/02/cv00/cv00375-re01.en02.pdf, last accessed 29 July 2010.

  3. 3.

    Garcia and Weatherill (2011).

  4. 4.

    Dec 291/2003/EC [2003] OJ L43/1.

  5. 5.

    COM (2007) 391. Full documentation is available via http://ec.europa.eu/sport/white-paper/index_en.htm, last accessed 29 July 2010.

  6. 6.

    Case 36/74 [1974] ECR 1405.

  7. 7.

    Case C-415/93 [1995] ECR I-4921.

  8. 8.

    Para. 106.

  9. 9.

    Case C-519/04 P [2006] ECR I-6991.

  10. 10.

    COMP 37.806 ENIC/UEFA, IP/02/942, 27 June 2002.

  11. 11.

    Weatherill 2006.

  12. 12.

    Decision 2003/778 Champions League [2003] O.J. L291/25.

  13. 13.

    See, e.g., Parrish 2003; Weatherill 2007a; Szyszczak 2007; Van den Bogaert and Vermeersch 2006. Placing the debate in the particular context of Lisbon, see Weatherill 2011.

  14. 14.

    For extended analysis see Parrish and Miettinen 2007; also Weatherill 2007b.

  15. 15.

    COM (2007) 391. Full documentation is available via http://ec.europa.eu/sport/white-paper/index_en.htm, last accessed 20 July 2010.

  16. 16.

    Also available via http://ec.europa.eu/sport/white-paper/index_en.htm.

  17. 17.

    Staff Working Document supra note 16, pp. 69, 78.

  18. 18.

    Supra note 9.

  19. 19.

    See, e.g., Infantino 2006; Zylberstein 2007.

  20. 20.

    See, e.g., Subiotto 2010.

  21. 21.

    Hill 2009.

  22. 22.

    Supra note 6.

  23. 23.

    Supra note 12.

  24. 24.

    Supra note 12, para. 165.

  25. 25.

    For vigorous scepticism see Moorhouse 2007.

  26. 26.

    Supra note 16, p. 45.

  27. 27.

    WQ P-4798/08. The contract was awarded to TMC Asser Instituut in 2010, Contract Notice 2010/S 31-043484.

  28. 28.

    Simonian 2010.

  29. 29.

    Case C-325/08 judgment of 16 March 2010 para. 40.

  30. 30.

    See in particular B. García’s pathbreaking article, García 2007.

References

  • García B (2007) UEFA and the European union: from confrontation to co-operation. J Contemp Eur Res 3:202

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia B, Weatherill S (2011) Engaging with the EU in order to minimise its impact: sport and the negotiation of the treaty of Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J (2009) The European commission’s white paper on sport: a step backwards for specificity? Int J Sport Policy 1:253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infantino G (2006) (Director of legal Affairs at UEFA) Meca-Medina: a step backwards for the European sports model and the specificity of sport? UEFA paper 02/10/06. Available at http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefa/KeyTopics/480391_DOWNLOAD.pdf

  • Moorhouse H (2007) Financial expertise, authority and power in the European football ‘industry’. J Contemp Eur Res 7:290

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish R (2003) Sports law and policy in the European union

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish R, Miettinen S (2007) The sporting exception in European law

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonian H (2010) UEFA blocks evian proposal’ financial times 20 July 2010. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/36457136-937c-11df-bb9a-00144feab49a.html

  • Subiotto R (2010) The adoption and enforcement of anti-doping rules should not be subject to European competition law. ECLR 323

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyszczak E (2007) Is sport special? In: Bogusz B, Cygan A, Szyszczak E (eds) The regulation of sport in the European union

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bogaert S, Vermeersch A (2006) Sport and the EC treaty: a tale of Uneasy Bedfellows. ELRev 31:821

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill S (2006) The sale of rights to broadcast sporting events under EC law. Int Sports Law J 3:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill S (2007a) European sports law

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill S (2007b) On overlapping legal orders: what is the ‘purely sporting rule’? In: Bogusz B, Cygan A, Szyszczak E (eds) The regulation of sport in the European union

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherill S (2011) EU sports law: the effect of the Lisbon treaty. Forthcoming In: Biondi A, Eekhout P (eds) The treaty of Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylberstein J (2007) Collision entre idéaux sportifs et continges économiques dans l’arret Meca-Medina. 2007/1-2 CDE 218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors/editors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weatherill, S. (2012). Fairness, Openness and the Specific Nature of Sport: Does the Lisbon Treaty Change EU Sports Law?. In: Siekmann, R., Soek, J. (eds) Lex Sportiva: What is Sports Law?. ASSER International Sports Law Series. T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-829-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships