Skip to main content

Palestine Statehood: A Rejoinder to Professor Robert Weston Ash

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Is There a Court for Gaza?
  • 1574 Accesses

Abstract

Professor Robert Weston Ash, in his response to my article The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue [supra in this Volume, Chap. 10—ChM], takes issue with my position that Palestine is a state.

President’s Club Professor in Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University. This article was first published in 36 Rutgers Law Record (2009), 257–263.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Supra, Chap. 11 in this Volume, previously published as Ash 2009.

  2. 2.

    See supra Chap. 11, respectively at Sects. 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4. [Ash 2009 at 188, 193, 197].

  3. 3.

    Id. at Sect. 11.2.

  4. 4.

    Id.

  5. 5.

    Israeli–Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, Sept. 28, 1995, UN Doc. A/51/889, S/1997/357, reprinted in 8 PAL. Y.B. INT’L L. 353 (1994–1995).

  6. 6.

    Id., Article IV(5), at 360.

  7. 7.

    Id., Article XXXI(6), at 371.

  8. 8.

    Talmon 1998.

  9. 9.

    Palestine National Council, Declaration of Independence, Nov. 15, 1988, UN Doc. A/43/827, S/20278, Annex III, 18 November 1988, reprinted in 27 ILM 1668 (1988).

  10. 10.

    See supra Chap. 11 at Sect. 11.2.

  11. 11.

    See Kelsen 1941.

  12. 12.

    Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 2004 ICJ 136, at 167 (July 9) [hereinafter “Legal Consequences”].

  13. 13.

    Quigley, supra Chap. 10 [previously published as Quigley 2009].

  14. 14.

    See supra Chap. 11, at Sect. 11.3.

  15. 15.

    Id.

  16. 16.

    See supra Chap. 10, at Sects. 10.5, 10.6.

  17. 17.

    Convention on Rights and Duties of States, Dec. 26, 1933, Article. 7, 165 LNTS 19 (stating, “The recognition of a state may be express or tacit”).

  18. 18.

    GA Res. 43/177, UN Doc. A/RES/43/177 (1988), available at http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.nsf/181c4bf00c44e5fd85256cef0073c426/146e6838d505833f852560d600471e25?OpenDocument.

  19. 19.

    See Paul Lewis 1989.

  20. 20.

    UN Doc. A/44/L.50 (Nov. 29, 1989).

  21. 21.

    Lewis 1989.

  22. 22.

    Kempster 1989.

  23. 23.

    UN General Assembly, 32d session, 27th plen. mtg. at 513, UN Doc. A/32/PV.27 (Oct. 10, 1977).

  24. 24.

    UN SCOR, 31st sess., 1870th mtg. at 2–3, 12–13, UN Doc. S/PV.1870 (Jan. 12, 1976). See also Suy 1978, pp. 138–139.

  25. 25.

    Legal Consequences, at 194.

  26. 26.

    Id.

  27. 27.

    Id. at 184.

  28. 28.

    Id. at 141.

  29. 29.

    Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 66.

  30. 30.

    Legal Consequences, at 251.

  31. 31.

    GA Res. 43/177.

  32. 32.

    SC Res. 662, UN Doc. S/RES/662 (1990) (seeking restoration of the “sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Kuwait.”), available at http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/category,LEGAL,,,KWT,3b00f13750,0.html.

  33. 33.

    See, e.g., Tamimi v. Minister of Defence, H.C. 507/85, 41(4) Piskei 1988; accord Dinstein 2009, pp. 277–279.

  34. 34.

    See supra Chap. 11, Sect. 11.4.

  35. 35.

    See Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements (Israel-PLO), Sept. 13, 1993, reprinted in 32 ILM 1525 (1993).

  36. 36.

    See Palestine National Council: Political Communique and Declaration of Independence, Nov. 15, 1988, UN Doc.A/43/827, S/20278, Annex III, Nov. 18, 1988, reprinted in 27 ILM 1668 (1988).

  37. 37.

    See Ash 2009 [and supra Chap. 11].

References

  • Ash R (2009) Is Palestine A “State”? A Response to Professor John Quigley’s Article, “The Palestine Declaration to The International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue. Rutgers Law Record 36:186–201. http://www.lawrecord.com/files/36-Rutgers-L-Rec-186.pdf [also in this Volume, Chapter 11]

  • Dinstein Y (2009) The International Law of Belligerent Occupation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1941) Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations. Am J Int Law 35:605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempster N (1989) PLO Urged to Drop Bid to UN Unit; U.S. Warns it would Withhold Money for Health Agency, 3 May 1989. L.A. Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P (1989) Arabs at UN Relax Stand on PLO, 6 December 1989. N.Y. Times

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley J (2009) The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue. Rutgers Law Record 35:1–10. http://www.lawrecord.com/files/35-rutgers-l-rec-1.pdf [also in this Volume, Chapter 10]

  • Suy E (1978) The Status of Observers in International Organizations. 160 Rec. Des Cours (Hague Acad Int Law) 75:138–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmon S (1998) Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quigley, J. (2011). Palestine Statehood: A Rejoinder to Professor Robert Weston Ash. In: Meloni, C., Tognoni, G. (eds) Is There a Court for Gaza?. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-820-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships