Skip to main content

Rule Selection in the Case of Israel’s Naval Blockade of Gaza: Law of Naval Warfare or Law of the Sea?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law ((YIHL,volume 13))

Abstract

The Israeli Navy enforcement of a blockade against Gaza, and the interdiction of the Mavi Marmara on 31 May 2010, raises the issue of whether or how the law of naval warfare applies in the struggle between Israel and Gaza. The law of blockade arose originally as a feature of international armed conflicts (IACs). If the Gaza conflict constitutes IAC, then the law of blockade applies. If, however, the Gaza conflict constitutes a non-international armed conflict (NIAC), the application of the law of blockade is less clear. While blockade originated as a legal concept in IAC, usage, state practice and opinio juris have caused it to migrate into NIAC. The analogy of the American Civil War offers clues for solving this riddle. The US experience suggests that if Gaza were regarded as a sovereign state, then a state of war—IAC—would exist between Israel and Gaza. In such case, there is no doubt that the imposition of blockade is lawful. But this determination places Israel in the same dilemma experienced by the Union during the Civil War. If Israel avails itself of the right to blockade Hamas, is it also willing to grant Hamas lawful belligerent status? If the law of blockade does not apply in the case of the Israeli armed struggle with Gaza because Gaza is not a ‘state’, then this determination produces the absurd result that a nation may defend itself using a lawful instrument recognized by the law of armed conflict in fighting another state, but must voluntarily forgo the option if confronted with an equally powerful entity that does not meet the legal definition. Consequently, the law of blockade applies in the case of Gaza because there is no other rule set that appropriately balances the interests of the belligerents and neutrals.

He also is a Senior Associate in the Center for Irregular Warfare and Armed Groups at the Naval War College, a Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a Senior Associate of the Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies at George Washington University and a Guest Investigator at the Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. As the former chief of the International Negotiations Division for the Director of Strategic Plans & Policy, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Commander Kraska led global maritime security strategy and policy for the U.S. armed forces. Commander Kraska recently completed a book on maritime piracy for Praeger Security International, and he is editing a volume on Arctic security for Cambridge University Press. His study, Maritime Power and the Law of the Sea: Expeditionary Operations in World Politics recently was published by Oxford University Press in 2011. He earned a doctor of juridical science (J.S.D.) and master of laws (LL.M.) from the University of Virginia Law School and a doctor of jurisprudence (J.D.) from Indiana University Maurer School of Law. The views presented are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cable J (1981) Gunboat diplomacy 1919–1979 political applications of limited naval force. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Deen T (2010) Israeli flotilla attack may violate international, maritime laws, The Island (Sri Lanka), 19 June 2010. http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=335

  • Dinstein Y (2004) The conduct of hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinstein Y (2005) War, aggression and self-defence, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doswald-Beck L (1995) San Remo manual on international law applicable to armed conflict at sea. IRRC 35:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks T (2010) Details of blockade revealed in court case. BBC News, 3 May 2010. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8654337.stm

  • Frenkel S (2010) Gaza blockade isn’t about security. McClatchey Newspapers, 9 June 2010. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/09/95621/israeli-document-gaza-blockade.html#ixzz0rK8RSa4p

  • Green LC (1993) The contemporary law of armed conflict. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman B (2010) What is IHH? The Turkish charity that helped plan the Gaza flotilla may be linked to Jihadist groups. The Jerusalem Post, 1 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes ML (2006) The naval blockade of Cuba during the Spanish–American war. In: Elleman BA, Paine SCM (eds) Naval blockades and seapower: strategies and counter-strategies 1805–2005. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintschel von Heinegg W (1991) Visit, search, diversion and capture in naval warfare, Part I The traditional law. Can Yearb Int Law 29:283–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintschel von Heinegg W (1992) Visit, search, diversion and capture in naval warfare, Part II Developments since 1945. Can Yearb Int Law 30:89–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz Y (2010) IDF: global jihad links on flotilla. The Jerusalem Post, 1 June 2010. http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=177169

  • Knickmeyer E (2007) Gaza straining at Egypt’s door: humanitarian, security worries mount. Washington Post, 18 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann EF (2006) The role of Islamic Charities in international terrorist recruitment and financing. DIIS working paper no. 2006/7 (Defense Institute of International Studies, 2006). http://www.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/WP2006/DIIS%20WP%202006-7.web.pdf

  • Kraska J (2010) Broken taillight at sea: the peacetime international law of visit, board, search and seizure. Ocean Coast Law J 16:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougal MS, Feliciano FP (1961) Law and minimum world public order: the legal regulation of international coercion. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell DP (1975) The influence of law on sea power. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim L (1969) In: Lauterpacht H (ed) International law, vol 2, 7th edn. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall J (1926) Constitutional problems under Lincoln. Appleton and Co Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush R et al (eds) (1903) Proclamation of President Abraham Lincoln, 19 April 1861, V Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of Rebellion at p 620 Ser. I, 27 vols, 1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler D, Toman J (eds) (2004) Helsinki principles on the law of maritime neutrality, adopted by the International Law Association, Taipei, Taiwan, 30 May 1998, reprinted in The laws of armed conflicts a collection of conventions, resolutions and other documents, Doc 115:1425–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt MN (1991) Blockade law: research design and sources. Hein, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt MN, Garraway CHB, Dinstein Y (eds) (2006) San Remo manual on the law of non-international armed conflict: with commentary, International Institute of Humanitarian Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HA (1932) Law of nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Swayze FB (1977) Traditional principles of blockade in modern practice: United States mining of internal and territorial waters of North Vietnam. JAG J 29:143–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H (2001) The Spanish civil war, rev edn. Modern Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner ME, Gallagher GW, Finkelman P (eds) (2002) The library of congress civil war desk reference. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigley RF (1973) The American way of war a history of United States military strategy and policy. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Kraska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

Article XI, Annex I, Maritime Activity Zones (Map No. 6), Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area, Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements [Declaration of Principles (DOP)], 13 September 1993

  1. 1.

    Maritime Activity Zones

    1. a.

      Extent of Maritime Activity Zones

      The sea off the coast of the Gaza Strip will be divided into three Maritime Activity Zones, K, L, and M as shown on map No. 6 attached to this Agreement, and as detailed below:

      1. 1.

        Zones K and M

        1. a.

          Zone K extends to 20 nautical miles in the sea from the coast in the northern part of the sea of Gaza and 1.5 nautical miles wide southwards.

        2. b.

          Zone M extends to 20 nautical miles in the sea from the coast, and one (1) nautical mile wide from the Egyptian waters.

        3. c.

          Subject to the provisions of this paragraph, Zones K and M will be closed areas, in which navigation will be restricted to activity of the Israel Navy.

      2. 2.

        Zone L

        1. a.

          Zone L bounded to the south by Zone M and to the north by Zone K extends 20 nautical miles into the sea from the coast.

        2. b.

          Zone L will be open for fishing, recreation and economic activities, in accordance with the following provisions:

          1. (i)

            Fishing boats will not exit Zone L into the open sea and may have engines of up to a limit of 25 HP for outboard motors and up to a maximum speed of 15 knots for inboard motors. The boats will neither carry weapons nor ammunition nor will they fish with the use of explosives.

          2. (ii)

            Recreational boats will be permitted to sail up to a distance of three nautical miles from the coast unless, in special cases, otherwise agreed within the Maritime Coordination and Cooperation Center as referred to in paragraph 3 below. Recreational boats may have engines up to a limit of ten horsepower. Marine motor bikes and water jets will neither be introduced into Zone L nor be operated therein.

          3. (iii)

            Foreign vessels entering Zone L will not approach closer than 12 nautical miles from the coast except as regards activities covered in paragraph 4 below.

    2. b.

      General Rules of the Maritime Activity Zones

      1. 1.

        The aforementioned fishing boats and recreational boats and their skippers sailing in Zone L shall carry licenses issued by the Palestinian Authority, the format and standards of which will be coordinated through the JSC.

      2. 2.

        The boats shall have identification markings determined by the Palestinian Authority. The Israeli authorities will be notified through the JSC of these identification markings.

      3. 3.

        Residents of Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip fishing in Zone L will carry Israeli licenses and vessel permits.

      4. 4.

        As part of Israel’s responsibilities for safety and security within the three Maritime Activity Zones, Israel Navy vessels may sail throughout these zones, as necessary and without limitations, and may take any measures necessary against vessels suspected of being used for terrorist activities or for smuggling arms, ammunition, drugs, goods, or for any other illegal activity. The Palestinian Police will be notified of such actions, and the ensuing procedures will be coordinated through the Maritime Coordination and Cooperation Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Stichting T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague, and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kraska, J. (2011). Rule Selection in the Case of Israel’s Naval Blockade of Gaza: Law of Naval Warfare or Law of the Sea?. In: Schmitt, M., Arimatsu, L., McCormack, T. (eds) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law - 2010. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, vol 13. T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships