Advertisement

The Introduction of Biometrics in The Netherlands: An Evaluation Under Data Protection and Administrative Law

  • Annemarie SprokkereefEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Information Technology and Law Series book series (ITLS, volume 20)

Abstract

Principles of proper administration form the basis of legitimate and due government. These include the prohibition to use a public competence for non legitimate purposes, and the principles of due care, reasonability, legal certainty, trust, proportionality, and motivation. This chapter explores current developments in the use of biometrics in the Netherlands in the wider context of the shift towards eGovernment. New forms of information handling in eGovernment are of course, also bound by the above principles. This raises some questions which need to be answered. Does eGovernment pose new challenges to the value of principles of proper administration in practice? Are the principles of proper administration rigorously applied to the introduction of biometric data in government information systems? With these questions in mind, I will give a short overview of the current use of biometric technologies and assess their impact on the evolving information structure of Dutch eGovernment.

Keywords

Smart Card Data Protection Biometric Data Biometric System Legal Certainty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

ICT

Information and Communication Technology

RFID

Radio Frequency Identification

DPA

Data Protection Act

References

  1. Commission (2009) Evaluation of the Hague program and action plan, COM (2009) 263 final. Brussels, 10.6.2009Google Scholar
  2. Coordinatiegroep Informatievoorziening Strafrechtsketen (CIS) (2008) Progis: protocol identiteitsvaststelling strafrechtketen. The Hague, Directie Generaal Rechtspleging en Rechtshandhaving, 3 September 2008Google Scholar
  3. De Hert P, Scheurs W, Brouwer E (2007) Machine-readable identity documents with biometric data in the EU—part III—overview of the legal framework. Keesing J Documents Identity 22:23–26Google Scholar
  4. De Hert P, Sprokkereef A (2009a) The use of privacy enhancing aspects of biometrics: biometrics as PET in the Dutch Private and semi-public domain. Tilburg, TILT, January 2009. http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=93109
  5. De Hert P, Sprokkereef A (2009b) Case study The Netherlands. In: Kindt E, Müller L (eds) D13.4. The privacy legal framework for biometrics, Fidis, May 2009. pp 80–93. Also available at http://www.fidis.net/fileadmin/fidis/deliverables/new_deliverables3/fidis_deliverable13_4_v_1.1.pdf
  6. Dijstelbloem H, Meijer A (2009) De migratie-machine: de rol van technologie in het migratiebeleid (The migration machine: the role of technology in migration policy). Van Gennep, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. European Council, Stockholm program an open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens (doc. 17024/09) adopted on 11.12.2009 (EuCo 6/09)Google Scholar
  8. Grijpink JHAM (2009) Uitgangspunten voor zinvol en veilig gebruik van biometrie. Priv en Informatie 12(6):273–279Google Scholar
  9. Hermans K (2010) Het gebruik van vingerafdrukken voor opsporingsdoeleinden onder de nieuwe paspoortwet en artikel 8 van het EVRM. NTM/NJCM-Bull 35(1):35–40Google Scholar
  10. Hes R, Hooghiemstra TFM, Borking JJ (1999) At face value, on biometrical identification and privacy registratiekamer achtergrond studies en verkenningen, 15 September 1999, pp 1–70. http://www.cbpweb.nl/documenten/av_15_At_face_value.stm
  11. Knopjes F (2009) Verkenning: Op Weg Naar een Visie Op Biometrie, Programma VIPS (Versterking identiteitsketen publieke sector) May 2009Google Scholar
  12. Mordini E, Tzovaras D (eds) (2010) Second generation biometrics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Prins C (1998) Biometric technology law—making our body identify for us: legal implications of biometric technologies. Comput law secur rep 14(3):159–167(7)Google Scholar
  14. Prins C (2007) Technocratie en de toekomstagenda van de nationale ombudsman. In: nationale ombudsman, werken aan behoorlijkheid. Den Haag, Boom Juridische UitgeversGoogle Scholar
  15. Zwenne GJ et al (2007) Eerste fase evalluatie wet bescherming persoonsgegevens: literatuuronderzoek en knelpunt analyse. eLaw@Leiden/WODSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2011 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TILT–Tilburg Institute for Law Technology and Society, Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations