Abstract
The historiography of sciences, we have been informed, has been parasitic upon the sciences, and as a genre has been the most conservative of the genres of historical writing. 1 However, the externalities and internalities that the history of sciences is bent on identifying, shape the historiography of science itself; and the so called parasitic determinants may well belong to the domain of internalities. Returning to the theme of the present paper, I look at the system of colonial education in British India as a site for the ‘expansion of European science’ in non-Western contexts. Thus while post-colonial theory has since dispensed with and extensively critiqued the notion of ‘European science’, 2 the question of the localization of so-called Western science has been addressed from the perspective of the practitioners of scientific disciplines in research environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
S. Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994; S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
- 2.
D. Chakrabarty, “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts”, in R. Guha, ed., The Subaltern Studies Reader: 1986–1995. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 261–293; S. Harding, Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1998; G. Prakash, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modern India, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999; D. Raina, “Multicultural and Postcolonial Theories of Science and Society”, Sandhan, 5, (2005):1–32; D. J. Hess, Science & Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts & Artifacts, New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
- 3.
S. L. Montgomery, Science in Translation - Movements of Knowledge through Cultures and Time, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000; B. Metcalf, “Hakim Ajmal Khan: Rais of Delhi and Muslim leader”, in R. E. Frykenberg, ed., Delhi through the Ages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
- 4.
T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
- 5.
S. Fuller, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History of our Times, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, p. 2.
- 6.
M. van Bruinssen, “The production of Islamic knowledge in Western Europe”, ISIM Newsletter, 8 September 2001, p. 3.
- 7.
D. Raina and S.I. Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004.
- 8.
S.N. Sen, “The Character of the Introduction of Western Science in India during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” Indian Journal of History of Science, 1 and 2 (1988): 112–122; D. Kumar, Science and the Raj, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995; D. Raina and S.I. Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004.
- 9.
D. Raina, Images and Contexts: Studies in the Historiography of Science in India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.
- 10.
D. Raina, “Multicultural and Postcolonial Theories of Science and Society”, Sandhan, 5, 1(2005):1–32.
- 11.
W. R. Pinch, “Same Difference in India and Europe,” History and Theory, 38, 3 (1999): 389–407 (pp. 390–393).
- 12.
C.A. Bayly, Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- 13.
Pinch, “Same Difference in India and Europe,” p. 395.
- 14.
R. Inden, Imagining India. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990.
- 15.
B.S. Cohn, Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 16.
- 16.
C. Hartnack, “British Psychoanalysis in Colonial India” in M. G. Ash and W. Woodward, eds., Psychology in Twentieth Century Thought and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987; A. Nandy, “The Savage Freud: The First Non-Western Psychoanalyst and the Politics of Secret Selves in Colonial India”, in The Savage Freud and Other Essays on Possible and Retrievable Selves, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995.
- 17.
See paper entitled “The Moral Legitimation of Science” in D. Raina and S.I. Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004; P. Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: a Derivative Discourse. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
- 18.
Hartnack, op. cit.
- 19.
P. Kharbanda, The Cultural Reception of Psychoanalysis in India: A Study of the Institutionalization of a discipline (1900–1950), M.Phil. dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, 2004.
- 20.
Ibid.
- 21.
Sudhir Kakkar, The Indian Psyche, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996.
- 22.
H. Fischer-Tiné and M. Mann, eds., Colonialism as Civilizing Mission: Cultural ideology in British India, London: Wimbledon Publishing Company, 2004, p. 4.
- 23.
M. Adas, “Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault on the Civilizing Mission Ideology,” Journal of World History, 15 (2004): 31–64 (p. 32).
- 24.
D. Raina and S.I. Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004.
- 25.
Bayly, Empire and Information, p. 247.
- 26.
D. Gosling, Science and Religion in India. Madras: The Christian Literary Society, 1976; see chapter 1 of Raina and Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004; T.V. Venkateswaran, “The Topography of a Changing World: Geological Knowledge during the Late Nineteenth Century Colonial Madras Presidency,” Indian Journal of History of Science, 37, 1 (2002): 57–83.
- 27.
Bayly, Empire and Information, p. 253.
- 28.
K. Raj, “Colonial Encounters and the Forging of New Knowledge and National Identities: Great Britain and India, 1760–1850,” Osiris, 15 (2001): 119–134.
- 29.
S. J. Gould, Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
- 30.
Venkateswaran, “The Topography of a Changing World,” pp. 57–83.
- 31.
Ibid, pp. 76–7.
- 32.
G. Viswanathan, Masks of Conquest. Literary Study and British Rule in India. London: Faber and Faber, 1989, p. 23.
- 33.
Ibid., p. 23.
- 34.
Ibid., p. 23.
- 35.
S. Ambirajan, “Science and Technology Education in South India, in R. Macleod and D. Kumar, eds., Technology and the Raj. Western Technology and Technical Transfers to India.1700–1947. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1995, p. 112.
- 36.
K. Kumar, Political Agenda of Education: A Study of Colonialist and Nationalist Ideas. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1991, p. 23.
- 37.
S. Bangaru, Debates in Technical Education; A Prelude to the Foundation of the Indian Institutes of Technology (1930–1950), M.Phil. dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, 2002.
- 38.
B. Chandra, Nationalism and Colonialism in Modern India. New Delhi: Orient Longman Ltd., 1979, p. 183.
- 39.
Bangaru, op. cit.
- 40.
Z. Baber, The Science of Empire: Scientific Knowledge, Civilization and Colonial Rule in India, New York: State University Press, 1996, p. 207.
- 41.
K.V. Mital, History of the Thomason College of Engineering (1847–1949), Roorkee: The University of Roorkee, 1986, p. 17.
- 42.
Ibid., p. 98.
- 43.
R. Macleod and R. Dionne, “Science and Policy in British India, 1858–1914: Perspectives on a Persisting Belief ”, Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference of Modern South Asian Studies, Colloques Internationaux du CNRS, Asie du Sud: Traditions et Changements. Paris: CNRS, 1979, pp. 55–68.
- 44.
A. Kumar, ‘Colonial Requirements and Engineering Education: The Public Works Department, 1847–1947’ in R. Macleod and D. Kumar, eds., Technology and the Raj. Western Technology and Technical Transfers to India, 1700–1947. New Delhi: Sage, 1995, pp. 216–234.
- 45.
Mital, op. cit., pp. 18–19; For a more detailed discussion on the subject see the second chapter in S. Bangaru, op. cit.
- 46.
Dharampal, The Beautiful Tree. Indigenous Indian Education in the Eighteenth Century, Mudra: Biblio Impex, 1983; R. Macleod, “On Visiting the Moving Metropolis: Reflections on the Architecture of Imperial Science,” Historical Records of Australian Science (Australian Academy of Science), 5, 3(1982): 1–16; J. Tschurenev, “Diffusing Useful Knowledge: The Monitorial System of Education in Madras, London and Bengal, 1789 – 1840,” Paedagogica Historica, XLIV, 3 (2008): 245–264.
- 47.
A. Nandy, Alternative Sciences, Delhi: Allied Publishers, 1980; K. Raj, “Colonial Encounters and the Forging of New Knowledge and National Identities: Great Britain and India, 1760–1850,” Osiris, 15 (2001): 119–134; D. Raina, Images and Contexts: Studies in the Historiography of Science in India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003; D. Raina and S.I. Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of Science and Culture in Colonial India, Delhi: Tulika Books, 2004; G. Prakash, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modern India, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
- 48.
Fuller, Thomas Kuhn, p. 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Raina, D. (2011). Travelling Both Ways: The Adaptation of Disciplines, Scientific Textbooks and Institutions. In: Günergun, F., Raina, D. (eds) Science between Europe and Asia. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 275. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9968-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9968-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9967-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9968-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)