Abstract
We examined the fossil remains of antelope (Mammalia: Bovidae) postcrania recovered from the Upper Laetolil Beds and the overlying Upper Ndolanya Beds in northern Tanzania. We used analyses of the ecomorphology of extinct antelopes to determine their habitat preferences. The most common postcranial elements - the phalanges, astragali, and distal radii - were examined. A total sample of 446 specimens was analyzed. Changes in the relative proportion of habitat preferences through time are suggestive of temporal fluctuations in habitat availability. As has been noted elsewhere, the mammals from Laetoli do not show the expected distribution of body sizes, so this paper also examined how such size biases, assumed to be taphonomic in origin, might have affected the reconstructions proposed here. We conclude that, on the basis of habitat preferences of the antelopes recovered from Laetoli, there is evidence for the continuous regional presence of woodland and forest throughout deposition of the Upper Laetolil Beds. Antelopes preferring forest and heavy cover habitats dominate the assemblage. Antelopes that locomoted principally in open and light cover habitats are largely in the minority, with a combined frequency never exceeding around 25% of the total in each stratigraphic unit of the Upper Laetolil Beds. The relative proportions of heavy cover and forest preferring antelopes in particular are likely affected by body size biases caused by taphonomic processes active during the deposition of the Upper Laetolil Beds, which favoured the preservation of the postcrania of smaller antelopes. During the formation of the Upper Ndolanya Beds, the proportion of antelopes preferring more open habitats is greatly increased, although forest-preferring antelopes are still present. The conclusion that forest and woodland were always present throughout the sequence is robust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrews, P. J. (1989). Palaeoecology of Laetoli. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 173–181.
Andrews, P., Lord, J., & Nesbit Evans, E. M. (1979). Patterns of ecological diversity in fossil and modern mammalian faunas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 11, 177–205.
Bishop, L. C. (1994). Pigs and the ancestors: Hominids, suids, and environments during the Plio-Pleistocene of East Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven.
Bishop, L. C. (1999). Suid paleoecology and habitat preference at African Pliocene and Pleistocene hominid localities. In T. G. Bromage & F. Schrenk (Eds.), African biogeography, climate change and early hominid evolution (pp. 216–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bishop, L. C., Hill, A., & Kingston, J. (1999). Paleoecology of Suidae from the Tugen Hills, Baringo, Kenya. In P. Andrews & P. Banham (Eds.), Late Cenozoic environments and hominid evolution: A tribute to Bill Bishop (pp. 99–111). London: Geological Society.
Brain, C. K. (1981). The hunters or the hunted. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bunn, H. T. (1986). Patterns of skeletal representation and hominid subsistence activities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, and Koobi Fora, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 15, 673–690.
DeGusta, D., & Vrba, E. S. (2003). A method for inferring paleohabitats from the functional morphology of bovid astragali. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 1009–1022.
DeGusta, D., & Vrba, E. S. (2005). Methods for inferring paleohabitats from the functional morphology of bovid phalanges. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1099–1113.
Ditchfield, P., & Harrison, T. (2011). Sedimentology, lithostratigraphy and depositional history of the Laetoli area. In T. Harrison (Ed.), Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context (Geology, geochronology, paleoecology, and paleoenvironment, vol. 1, pp. 47–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
Estes, R. D. (1991). The behavior guide to African mammals. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gentry, A. W. (1970). The Bovidae (Mammalia) of the Fort Ternan fossil fauna. In L. S. B. Leakey & R. J. G. Savage (Eds.), Fossil vertebrates of Africa (vol. 2, pp. 243–323). London: Academic.
Hernesniemi, E., Evans, A. R., Giaourtsakis, I. X., & Fortelius, M. (2011). Rhinocerotidae. In T. Harrison (Ed.), Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context (Fossil hominins and the associated fauna, vol. 2, pp. 275–293). Dordrecht: Springer.
James, M. (1985). Classification algorithms. New York: Wiley.
Kaiser, T. M. (2011). Feeding ecology and niche partitioning of the Laetoli ungulate faunas. In T. Harrison (Ed.), Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context (Geology, geochronology, paleoecology and paleoenvironment, vol. 1, pp. 329–354). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kappelman, J. (1986). The paleoecology and chronology of the middle Miocene hominoids from the Chinji Formation of Pakistan. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.
Kappelman, J. (1988). Morphology and locomotor adaptations of the bovid femur in relation to habitat. Journal of Morphology, 198, 119–130.
Kappelman, J. (1991). The paleoenvironment of Kenyapithecus at Fort Ternan. Journal of Human Evolution, 20, 95–129.
Kappelman, J., Plummer, T. W., Bishop, L. C., Duncan, A., & Appleton, S. (1997). Bovids as indicators of Plio-Pleistocene paleoenvironments of East Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 95–129.
Kingston, J., & Harrison, T. (2007). Isotopic dietary reconstructions of Pliocene herbivores at Laetoli: Implications for early hominin paleoecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 243, 272–306.
Kovarovic, K., & Andrews, P. (2007). Bovid postcranial ecomorphological survey of the Laetoli paleoenvironment. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 663–680.
Kovarovic, K., & Andrews, P. (2011). Environmental change within the Laetoli fossiliferous sequence: Vegetation catenas and bovid ecomorphology. In T. Harrison (Ed.), Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context (Geology, geochronoÂlogy, paleoecology and paleoenvironment, vol. 1, pp. 367–380). Dordrecht: Springer.
Leakey, M. D., & Harris, J. M. (Eds.). (1987). Laetoli: A Pliocene site in northern Tanzania. Oxford: Clarendon.
Lewis, M. E. (1997). Carnivoran paleoguilds of Africa: Implications for hominid food procurement strategies. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 257–288.
Plummer, T. W., & Bishop, L. C. (1994). Hominid paleoecology at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania as indicated by antelope remains. Journal of Human Evolution, 29, 321–362.
Plummer, T. W., Bishop, L. C., & Hertel, F. (2008). Habitat preference of extant African bovids based on astragalus morphology: Operationalizing ecomorphology for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 3016–3027.
Reed, K. E. (1997). Early hominid evolution and ecological change through the African Plio-Pleistocene. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 289–322.
Reed, K. E. (1998). Using large mammal communities to examine ecological and taxonomic organization and predict vegetation in extant and extinct assemblages. Paleobiology, 32, 384–408.
Reyment, R. A. (1991). Multidimensional palaeobiology. New York: Pergamon.
Rossouw, L., & Scott, L. (2011). Phytoliths and pollen, the microscopic plant remains in Pliocene volcanic sediments around Laetoli, Tanzania. In T. Harrison (Ed.), Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context (Geology, geochronology, paleoecology and paleoenvironment, vol. 1, pp. 201–215). Dordrecht: Springer.
Scott, K. M. (1979). Adaptation and allometry in bovid postcranial proportions. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven.
Scott, K. (1985). Allometric trends and locomotor adaptations in the Bovidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 197, 197–288.
Spencer, L. (1997). Dietary adaptations of Plio-Pleistocene Bovidae: Implications for hominid habitat use. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 201–228.
Sponheimer, M., Reed, K. E., & Lee-Thorp, J. A. (1999). Combining isotopic and ecomorphological data to refine bovid paleodietary reconstruction: A case study from the Makapansgat Limeworks hominin locality. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 705–718.
Su, D. F. (2005). The paleoecology of Laetoli, Tanzania: Evidence from the mammalian fauna of the Upper Laetolil Beds. Ph.D. dissertation. New York University, New York.
Su, D. F., & Harrison, T. (2007). The paleoecology of the Upper Laetolil Beds at Laetoli: A reconsideration of the large mammal evidence. In R. Bobe, Z. Alemseged, & A. K. Behrensmeyer (Eds.), Hominin environments in the East African Pliocene: An assessment of the faunal evidence (pp. 279–313). Dordrecht: Springer.
Su, D. F., & Harrison, T. (2008). Ecological implications of the relative rarity of fossil hominins at Laetoli. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 672–681.
Van der Klaauw, C. J. (1948). Ecological studies and reviews. IV. Ecological Morphology. Bibliotheca Biotheoretica, 4, 27–111.
Werdelin, L., & Lewis, M. E. (2001). A revision of the genus Dinofelis (Mammalia, Felidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 132, 147–258.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Terry Harrison for the invitation to work on this material and to contribute to this volume. Research permission was obtained from the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology. LCB and KK acknowledge generous support from The Leverhulme Trust. TP acknowledges support from the Professional Staff Congress-City University of New York Research Award Program. Thanks also to the staff of the numerous museums where we measured antelopes for this study, particularly the American Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of Natural History, and The Natural History Museum (London). At the National Museum of Tanzania in Dar es Salaam, Amandus Kweka provided endless support and hospitality. Thanks to two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped us improve the manuscript. We are grateful to Julien Louys for assistance in data collection and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Measurements and Ratios Used in This Study
Appendix: Measurements and Ratios Used in This Study
Distal Radius
- LDARTML:
-
log(mediolateral breadth of distal articular surface)
- LDMAXAP:
-
log(maximum anteroposterior diameter, distal end)
- LDCENTAP:
-
log(anteroposterior length of central facet, distal end)
- LDCENML2:
-
log(mediolateral breadth, most constricted point of the medial facet, distal end)
- LDLATAP:
-
log(anteroposterior length of lateral facet, distal end)
- LDLATML:
-
log(mediolateral length of lateral facet, distal end)
- LDTUBML:
-
log(distance between tuberosities, dorsal side of distal end)
- LDISI3:
-
ldmaxml/ldcresap = log(maximum mediolateral breadth, distal end)/log(anteroposterior length of distal crest)
- LDISI8:
-
ldcentap/ldlatap = log(anteroposterior length of central facet, distal end)/log(anteroposterior length of lateral facet, distal end)
- LDISI24:
-
ldmaxap/ldtubml = log(maximum anteroposterior diameter, distal end)/log(distance between tuberosities, dorsal side of distal end)
- LDISI25:
-
ldtubml/ldcresap = log(distance between tuberosities, dorsal side of distal end)/log(anteroposterior length of distal crest)
Astragalus
- TARSMLT:
-
Tarsal articulation M-L
- TAMAP:
-
Depth of medial portion of tarsal articulation
- MINLEN:
-
Minimum astragalus length
- TUBTIBA:
-
Tibial articulation to fibular tuberosity
- LENRAT11:
-
Flangeml/medlen*100 = ML across flange of medial trochlea/medial length
- LENRAT21:
-
Timap/medlen*100 = Length of tibial articulation, medial side/medial length
- PCFRAT24:
-
Pcflap/tubml*100 = posterior calcaneal facet, lateral length/mediolateral width at tuberosity
- TICRAT2:
-
Ticap/tilap*100 = tibial articulation, minimum length/tibial articulation, lateral length
- SIRAT3:
-
Lcfdsi/tubtiba*100 = distal lateral calcaneal facet, depth/tibial articulation to fibular tuberosity
- TARAT5:
-
Tarsmlm/Tarsmlt*100 = tarsal articulation ML, medial side/tarsal articulation ML
- TARAT9:
-
Tarsmlm/tamap*100 = tarsal articulation ML, medial side/depth of medial portion of tarsal articulation
Proximal Phalanges
- LPARTBR:
-
log of the proximal articular breadth
- LMAP:
-
log of midshaft anteroposterior diameter
- LDMAXAP:
-
log of maximum anteroposterior dimension of the distal end
- LDMINML:
-
log of the minimum mediolateral dimension of the distal end
- LPROX1:
-
lmaxlen/lminlen = log(maximum length)/log(minimum length)
- LPROX2:
-
lpmaxht/lpmaxbr = log(maximum height of proximal end)/log(articular breadth of the proximal end)
- LPROX7:
-
ldmaxml/ldminml = log(maximum mediolatÂeral breadth of distal end)/log(minimum mediolateral breadth of distal end)
- LPROX12:
-
lminlen/lpmaxht = log(minimum length)/log(maximum height of the proximal end)
- LPROX18:
-
lminlen/ldminap = log(minimum length)/log(minimum anteroposterior dimension, distal end)
- LPROX20:
-
ldmaxml/lmml = log(maximum mediolateral breadth of distal end)/log(midshaft mediolateral diameter)
- LPROX21:
-
lmaxlen/lmml = log(maximum length)/log(midshaft mediolateral diameter)
Intermediate Phalanges
- LMAXLEN:
-
log(maximum length)
- LMML:
-
log(midshaft mediolateral diameter)
- LDARHMAX:
-
log(maximum height, distal articular surface)
- LINT1:
-
lmaxlen/lminlen = log(maximum length)/log(minimum length)
- LINT4:
-
lmap/lmml = log(midshaft anteroposterior diameter)/log(medshaft mediolateral diaÂmeter)
- LINT5:
-
ldmaxml/ldminm = log(maximum breadth, distal end)/log(minimum breadth, distal end)
- LINT8:
-
ldarhmax/ldminml = log(maximum height, distal articular surface)/log(minimum breadth, distal end)
- LINT11:
-
lmaxlen/lLS = log(maximum length)/log (supe-rior length)
- LINT17:
-
lpmaxbr/ldmaxml = log(maximum breadth, proximal end)/log(maximum breadth, Âdistal end)
- LINT21:
-
lmaxlen/lmml = log(maximum length)/log(midshaft mediolateral diameter)
Distal Phalanges
- LMAXLEN:
-
log(maximum length)
- LPMAXBR:
-
log(maximum breadth, proximal end)
- LLENSUP:
-
log(superior length)
- LMAXHT:
-
log(maximum height)
- LMPSB:
-
log(breadth of the plantar surface at its midpoint)
- LDIS8:
-
llensup/lpartht = log(superior length)/log(proxi-mal articular height)
- LDIS17:
-
lpartht/lmpsb = log(proximal articular height)/log(breadth of the plantar surface, at its midpoint)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bishop, L.C., Plummer, T.W., Hertel, F., Kovarovic, K. (2011). Paleoenvironments of Laetoli, Tanzania as Determined by Antelope Habitat Preferences. In: Harrison, T. (eds) Paleontology and Geology of Laetoli: Human Evolution in Context. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9956-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9956-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9955-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9956-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)