Abstract
This chapter explores the utilization of social cohesion and diversity in creating more sustainable multi-cultural communities. Community greening is seen as a catalyst for sustainability-oriented social learning. Greening here is not the same as literally adding green to a community (trees, parks, gardens) – although that certainly can be a part of it – but rather as a metaphor for improving quality of life and a stepping stone towards sustainability. Social learning is introduced as a process that builds social cohesion and relationships in order to be able to utilize the different perspectives, values and interests people bring to a sustainability challenge. Although there are many perspectives and definitions of social learning it is defined here as: a collaborative, emergent learning process that hinges on the simultaneous cultivation of difference and social cohesion in order to create joint ownership, and to unleash creativity and energy needed to break with existing patterns, routines or systems. The chapter is empirically grounded in the Dutch city of Rotterdam. We use the phrase red zone to refer to parts of Rotterdam, because there are a number of socio-economic, cultural and ecological issues that could come together and escalate in ways that we have seen in similar Western European metropolitan areas such as the Paris banlieues. One of the questions we address is: How can, under conditions like these, diversity and social cohesion be used in building more sustainable practices, lifestyles and systems?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
The UN Millennium Development Goals are to: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; Achieve universal primary education; Promote gender equality and empower women; Reduce child mortality; Improve maternal health; Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; Ensure environmental sustainability; and Develop a Global Partnership for Development. Source: www.un.org/millenniumgoals
References
Allen, C. (2003). Fair justice. The Bradford disturbances, the sentencing and the impact. Guildford and King’s Lynn, London.
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., et al. (Eds.). (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Beers, P. J., Sol, J., et al. (2010, July 4–7). Social learning in a multi-actor innovation context. In Building sustainable rural futures: The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty, the 9th IFSA conference, Vienna.
Blackmore, C. (2007). What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: A theoretical overview. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 512–525.
Bouwen, R., & Taillieu, T. (2004). Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 137–153.
Bovenkerk, F. (2009). Etniciteit, Criminaliteit en Het Strafrecht Utrecht. Thesis, Utrecht University.
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., et al. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765.
COS (2008). Feitenkaart. Omnibusenquete (COS) Centrum voor Onderzoek en Statistiek, Rotterdam.
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education – Culture, power, and liberation. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Freire, P. (1987). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.
Glasser, H. (2007). Minding the gap: The role of social learning in linking our stated desire for a more sustainable desire to our everyday actions and policies. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world (pp. 35–62). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Holden, M. (2008). Social learning in planning: Seattle’s sustainable development codebooks. Progress in Planning, 69(1), 1–40.
IFRC (2004). Focus on community resilience (World Disasters Report, p. 231). Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
James, T. (2000). Kurt Hahn and the aims of education. www.kurthahn.org/writings/james.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2013.
Komen, M., & Van Schooten, E. (2009). Ethnic disparities in Dutch juvenile justice. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 7(2), 85–106.
Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 325–344.
Peper, A. (1973). Vorming van welzijnsbeleid. Evolutie en evaluatie van het opbouwwerk. Meppel: Boom, tweede druk.
Plummer, R., & FitzGibbon, J. (2007). Connecting adaptive co-management, social learning, and social capital through theory and practice. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., et al. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4), r1.
Rolfe, R. E. (2006). Social cohesion and community resilience: A multi-disciplinary review of literature for Rural Health Research. Halifax: Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research Saint Mary’s University.
Schneider, C. L. (2008). Police power and race riots in Paris. Politics & Society, 36(1), 133–145.
van Asselt, M. B. A. (2000). Perspectives on uncertainty and risk. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Veldhuis, T., & Bakker, E. (2009). Muslims in the Netherlands: Tensions and violent conflict. Ethno-religious conflict in Europe: Typologies of radicalisation in Europe’s Muslim communities. Brighton: MICROCON.
Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Epilogue: Creating networks of conversations. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world (pp. 497–507). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Wals, A. E. J., Geerling-Eijff, F., et al. (2008). All mixed up? Instrumental and emancipatory learning towards a more sustainable world: Considerations for EE policy-makers. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7(4), 55–65.
Wals, A. E. J., van der Hoeven, N., et al. (2009). The acoustics of social learning: Designing learning processes that contribute to a more sustainable world. Wageningen/Utrecht: Wageningen Academic Publishers/SenterNovem.
Wals, A. E. J., & Noorduyn, L. (2010). Social learning in action: A reconstruction of an urban community moving towards sustainability. In: Stevenson, R. & Dillon, J. (Eds.), Engaging environmental education: Learning, culture and agency (pp. 59–76). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wals, A.E.J., van der Waal, M.E. (2014). Sustainability-Oriented Social Learning in Multi-cultural Urban Areas: The Case of the Rotterdam Environmental Centre. In: Tidball, K., Krasny, M. (eds) Greening in the Red Zone. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9947-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9947-1_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9946-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9947-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)