Advertisement

The Participatory Dimension in Nature Conservation Processes: Examples of Ideology and Practice from Norway

  • Karoline Daugstad
Chapter
Part of the Landscape Series book series (LAEC, volume 13)

Abstract

The dominating legal instrument for area-based protection in Norway has been the Nature Conservation Act. Although protection is directed mainly towards species, ecosystems and landforms, area designations in practice affect landscapes. For this reason, lessons may be learnt from investigating recent policy shifts and managerial changes under the Nature Conservation Act, especially related to participatory aspects relevant to the implementation of the European Landscape Convention. The present chapter provides a schematic view of current approaches to and shifting paradigms in nature conservation on an international Open image in new window level, with particular focus on participatory approaches. This is followed by the presentation of findings from recent research into the issue of management systems and models related to designated nature conservation areas in Norway. The last part of the paper positions the findings in relation to the European Landscape Convention.

Keywords

Nature conservation Local participation Management models 

References

  1. Aasetre J, Skjeggedal T (2004) Lokal forvaltning av verneområdene i Forollhogna: Delrapport 1 i evalueringen av forvaltningsforsøket. Nord-Trøndelagsforskning, SteinkjerGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams WM, Hulme D (2001) Conservation & communities: changing narratives, policies and practices in African conservation. In: Hulme D, Murphree M (eds) African Wildlife & Livelihoods: The promise and performance of community conservation. James Currey, Oxford, pp 9–23Google Scholar
  3. Cleaver F (2002) Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In: Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books, London, pp 36–55Google Scholar
  4. Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2002) Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Daugstad K (1999) Mellom romantikk og realisme: Om seterlandskapet som ideal og realitet, R-16/99. Centre for Rural Research, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Daugstad K (2005) Nasjonalparken møter kommunen. Nationen 25.052005Google Scholar
  7. Daugstad K, Kaltenborn BP, Vistad OI (2000) Vern – planer og prosesser: Identifisering av kunnskapsstatus og -behov, N-3/00. Centre for Rural Research, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  8. Daugstad K, Rønningen K (2004) Landskapet som felles gode og privat ressurs. In: Setten G (ed) Det levende landskapet. Tapir, Trondheim, pp 111–129Google Scholar
  9. Daugstad K, Svarstad H, Vistad OI (2005) Geiranger-Herdalen: Lang dags ferd mot vern. Plan 2005 3–4:58–64Google Scholar
  10. Daugstad, K, Svarstad, H, Vistad, OI (2006a) A case of conflicts in conservation: two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity?. Landsc Res 31(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daugstad K, Svarstad H, Vistad OI (2006b) Community-based nature protection. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustainability 2(3):127–135Google Scholar
  12. Falleth E (2004a) Forvaltningsforsøket i Setesdal Vesthei–Ryfylkeheiane landskapsvernområde og Steinbuskardet–Hisdal biotopvernområde: Kommunenes og sekretariatets arbeid fra 2000 til 2004: Delrapport 4 av NIBRs evaluering av forvaltningsforsøket. NIBR, OsloGoogle Scholar
  13. Falleth E (2004b) Hvordan dannes nettverk: Om lokal organisering og kollektiv handling i Setesdal Vesthei–Ryfylkeheiane. Kart og Plan 3:158–164Google Scholar
  14. Gerritsen P, Wiersum F (2005) Farmer and conventional perspectives on conservation in Western Mexico. Mt Res Dev 25(1):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gurran N (2004) Integrating local people and national parks in rural Australia: community involvement and support for conservation. In: Camarda I, Manfredo MJ, Mulas F, Teel TL (eds) Global challenges of parks and protected area management: proceedings of the 9th ISSRM. Carlo Delfino editore, Sassari-Italy, pp 273–283Google Scholar
  16. Hovik S, Falleth E (2005) Holdninger til landskapsvern og lokal forvaltning i Setesdal Vesthei–Ryfylkeheiane, N-139. NIBR, OsloGoogle Scholar
  17. Lane MB, Corbett T (2005) The tyranny of localism: indigenous participation in community-based environmental management. J Environ Policy Plann 7(2):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lov om Naturvern (1970) Norges Lover 1685–1991. Ad Notam, OsloGoogle Scholar
  19. Michaelidou M, Decker DJ (2004) Nature conservation and community viability: implications of European Union policies for mountain communities in the Pafos forest, Cyprus. In: Camarda I, Manfredo MJ, Mulas F, Teel TL (eds) Global challenges of parks and protected area management: proceedings of the 9th ISSRM. Carlo Delfino editore, Sassari-Italy, pp 393–403Google Scholar
  20. Naturmangfoldloven (2009) Lov 2009-06-19 nr 100: Lov om forvaltning av naturens mangfold (naturmangfoldloven). Lovdata. http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20090619-100.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2010
  21. Neumann RP (1997) Primitive ideas: protected area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Dev Change 28:559–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Rourke E (2005) Landscape planning and community participation: local lessons from Mullaghmore, the Burren National Park. Landsc Res 30(4):483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pimbert MP, Pretty JN (1997) Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. In: Ghimire BK, Pimbert MP (eds) Social change and conservation. Earthscan, London, pp 297–330Google Scholar
  24. Selman P (2004) Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes. J Environ Plann Manage 47(3):365–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skjeggedal T, Aasetre J (2005) Lokal forvaltning av verneområdene i Forollhogna: Delrapport 2 i evalueringen av forvaltningsforsøket. Trøndelag forskning og utvikling, SteinkjerGoogle Scholar
  26. St. meld. 31 (2000–2001) Kommune, Fylke, Stat – en bedre oppgavefordeling. Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet, OsloGoogle Scholar
  27. Stoll-Kleeman S (2001) Opposition to the designation of protected areas in Germany. J Environ Plann Manage 44(1):109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svarstad H, Daugstad K, Vistad OI (2003) Hvem vil være enige og tro på Dovrefjell? Et case om framveksten av lokal forvaltning av verneområder. Utmark 4(2), (not paginated). http://www.utmark.org. Accessed 10 Dec 2003
  29. Svarstad H, Daugstad K, Vistad OI, Guldvik I (2006) New protected areas in Norway: local participation without gender equality?. Mt Res Dev 26(1):48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Terborgh J (1999) Requiem for nature. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Vistad OI, Daugstad K, Svarstad H (2006) Store verneområde med lokal forvaltning: Funn og refleksjonar. Utmark 6(1) (not paginated). http://www.utmark.org. Accessed 5 Mar 2006
  32. Wilshusen PR, Brechin SR, Fortwangler CR, West PC (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation. Soc Nat Resour 15:17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations