Advertisement

Difficulties of Scaling in Forest and Water Management in Urban Areas: Social and Institutional Dimension

  • Sultan BekirogluEmail author
  • Ömer Eker
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 212)

Abstract

Efficient scaling, from small headwater catchments to major river basins, also requires integration of social, economic and ecologic information with physical landscape data in order to build up appropriate solutions for managing forests and water resources in harmony. Besides supplying a high proportion of the water for domestic, industrial and ecological needs forests also provide society with a range of other conservation, amenity and environmental benefits such as recreation, biodiversity, erosion control, water collection, wildlife shelter, reduction of the negative effects of green house gasses and global climate change and others. The main objective of managers and planners is to maximize this wide range of benefits without detriment to water resources and ecosystem function. In this study, the interactive connections between water and forest management and the complexities among socio-economic-environmental and institutional systems are highlighted with some examples from European urban lands.

Keywords

River Basin Transboundary Water Transboundary River Volga River Basin River Basin District 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to give special thanks to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) for giving us the opportunity to get involved in this research.

References

  1. Anonymous (2002) International expert meeting on forests and water: Shiga decleration on forests and water. http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/faw2002/shiga.htmlAccessed: 10 December 2008
  2. Anonymous (2007) Major European watersheds. http://www.grid.unep.ch/product/publication/freshwater_europe/seine.php. Accessed: 12 Oct 2008
  3. Borgström ST, Elmqvist T, Angelstam P, Alfsem-Norodom C (2006) Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecol Soc 11(2):16Google Scholar
  4. Bruns BR, Ringler C, Dick RM (2005) Water rights reform: lessons for institutional design. International Food Policy Research Institute Publications (IFPRI), Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Darghaut S, Ward C, Gambarelli G, Styger E, Roux J (2008) Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: lessons for scaling up, vol 11, Water sector board discussion paper series. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) (2008) EECCA Component: Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. http://euwi.jrc.it/index.php?main=1&sub=1&id=128#56. Accessed 30 Oct 2008
  7. FAO (2008) Forests and freshwater: vital connections. http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/focus/2003/wfc2.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2008
  8. GPPArthitecture (2007) Seine River Greenway: Reach 1 Redriver to Happyland Park. http://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/planning/pdf_folder/ SeineRiverPlan.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2008
  9. Lagutov V (2008) Rescue of sturgeon species in the Ural River Basin, NATO science for peace and security series – C: Environmental Security. Springer, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lovell C, Mandondo A, Moriarty P (2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Conserv Ecol 5(2):25Google Scholar
  11. Nilsson S (2006) Managing water according to river basins: Information management, institutional arrangements and strategic policy support – with focus on the EU Water Framework Directive. TRITA-LWR. Ph.D. Thesis, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  12. United Nations (UN) (2004) World urbanization prospects: the 2003 revision. U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division.http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2003/2003WUPHighlights.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2008
  13. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS) (2002) State of the environment and policy retrospective: 1972–2002. http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3/english/pdfs/chapter2-8_urban.pdf
  14. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Global environment outlook 3: past, present and future perspectives. Earthscan Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2004) Freshwater in Europe – facts, figures and maps. DEWA-Europe. Switzerland.http://www.grid.unep.ch/product/publication/freshwater_europe/intro.php. Accesed 24 November 2008
  16. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2008) Water governance in Europe and CIS: Transboundary water management. http://europeandcis.undp.org/environment/wg/show/FA499AD7-F203-1EE9-BF1DD1F9F83C486F. Accessed 20 Oct 2008
  17. Wolters H, Ridder D, Mostert M, Otter H and Patel M (2006) Social learning in water management: Lessons from the harmoniCOP Project. E-W Ater http://www.ewaonline.de/journal/2007_01.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2008
  18. Zingari PC, Achouri M (2007) Five years after Shiga: recent developments in forest and water policy and implementation. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1598e/a1598e13.htm Accessed 18 Dec 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Engineering Division, Department of Forestry Economicsİstanbul UniversityBahçeköyTurkey
  2. 2.Forest Engineering Division, Department of Forest EconomicsKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam UniversityKahramanmaraşTurkey

Personalised recommendations