Up- and Downscaling Model Approaches for Water Relations in Forest Management from Plot to Landscape Level

  • Chris S. EastaughEmail author
  • Stephan A. Pietsch
  • Richard Petritsch
  • Elisabeth Pötzelsberger
  • Hubert Hasenauer
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 212)


Water is one of the key drivers of ecosystem processes and forest growth. In large parts of the world water is a limiting factor and determines the species distributions, productivity and risks to our forests. To mimic the behaviour of ecosystem processes forest ecosystem models have been developed. Such models allow the integration of different processes such as the water cycle to analyse and study ecosystem behaviour. One important issue of such exercises is the integration of processes acting at different temporal and spatial scales.

The purpose of this paper is to discuss scaling issues important for deriving the water cycle in managed forests across Europe. Specifically it relates to how water-related processes may be integrated so that point or plot information may be generalised to large scale applications. After a general discussion on scaling issues four examples related to scaling water relations within forest management are presented: (i) groundwater infiltration and its impact on forest growth, (ii) water runoff from forest roads, (iii) catchment water yield modeling as it is related to forest cover and (iv) wildfire risk assessment.


Forest Management Vapor Pressure Deficit Coarse Scale Forest Road Fire Danger 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Work presented in this chapter was compiled specifically for COST Action FP 0601 ‘Forest Management and the Water Cycle’, with individual examples drawn from work at BOKU University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Institute of Silviculture (Vienna), the Austrian Forest Fire Research Initiative (AFFRI) and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Land and Water Division (Canberra).


  1. Bachelet D, Lenihan J, Daly C, Neilson R, Ojima D, Parton W (2001) MC1: a dynamic vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated ecosystem fluxes of carbon, nutrients and water. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-508Google Scholar
  2. Beltrán-Przekurat A, Marshall CH, Pielke RA Sr (2008) Ensemble reforecasts of recent warm-season weather: impacts of a dynamic vegetation parameterization. J Geophys Res vol.113, 18 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond-Lamberty B, Peckham SD, Ahl DE, Gower ST (2007) Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. Nature vol.450:89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgan RE (1988) 1988 Revisions to the 1978 National Fire Danger Rating System. Res. Paper SE-273. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NCGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbone G (2007) Exercises in weather and climate. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. Cermak J, Deml M, Penka M (1973) A new method of sap flow rate determination in trees. Biol Plantarum vol.15:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cermak J, Ulehla J, Kucera J, Penka M (1982) Sap flow rate and transpiration dynamics in the full-grown oak (Quercus robur L.) in floodplain forest exposed to seasonal floods as related to potential evapotranspiration and tree dimensions. Biol Plantarum vol. 24:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang M (2003) Forest hydrology: an introduction to water and forests. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  9. Eastaugh CS, Rustomji PK, Hairsine PB (2008) Quantifying the altered hydrologic connectivity of forest roads resulting from decommissioning and relocation. Hydrol Process 22(14):2438–2448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (eds) (1995) USDA-water erosion prediction project: hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report #10, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasenauer H, Merganicova K, Petritsch R, Pietsch SA, Thornton PE (2003) Validation of daily climate interpolations over complex terrain in Austria. Agric For Meteorol vol.119:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hairsine PB, Croke JC, Mathews H, Fogarty P, Mockler SP (2002) Modelling plumes of overland flow from logging tracks. Hydrol Process vol.16:2311–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones PG, Thornton PK (1999) MarkSim: software to generate daily weather data for Latin America and Africa. Agron J vol.92:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keetch JJ, Byram G (1968) A drought index for forest fire control. Res. Paper SE-38. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NCGoogle Scholar
  15. Krinner G, Viovy N, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Ogée J, Polcher J, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Sitch S, Prentice C (2005) A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochem Cycles vol.19, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarthy MA, Lindenmayer DB (1998) Multi-aged mountain ash forest, wildlife conservation and timber harvesting. For Ecol Manage vol.104:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellilo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary productivity. Nature vol.363:234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merganičová K, Pietsch SA, Hasenauer H (2005) Testing mechanistic modeling to assess impacts of biomass removal. For Ecol Manage vol.207:37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohren GMJ, Burkhart HE (1994) Contrasts between biologically-based process models and management-oriented growth and yield models. For Ecol Manage vol.69:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Novenko EY, Glasko MP, Burova OV (2009) Landscape-and-climate dynamics and land use in late Holocene forest-steppe ecotone of East European Plain (upper Don River case study). Quatern Int vol.203:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oh JH, Kim T, Kim MK, Lee SH, Min SK, Kwon WT (2004) Regional climate simulation for Korea using dynamic downscaling and statistical adjustment. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 82(6):1629–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Saponara J, Silander JA, Kobe RK, Ribbens E (1996) Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol Monogr 66(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petritsch R, Hasenauer H (2007) Interpolating input parameters for large scale ecosystem models. Aust J For Sci – Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen vol.124:135–151Google Scholar
  24. Petritsch R, Hasenauer H (2009) Tägliche Wetterdaten im 1 km Raster von 1960 bis 2008 für Österreich. Austrian Journal of Forest Science 126(4):215–225Google Scholar
  25. Pietsch SA, Hasenauer H (2002) Using mechanistic modeling within forest ecosystem restoration. For Ecol Manage vol.159:111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pietsch SA, Hasenauer H, Kučera J, Čermák J (2003) Modeling effects of hydrological changes on the carbon and nitrogen balance of oak in floodplains. Tree Physiol vol.23:735–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pötzelsberger E (2008) Assessing the productivity and water regime in the Schmittenbach catchment area. Master thesis at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  28. Pötzelsberger E, Hasenauer H, Petritsch R, Pietsch SA, Quehenberger C (2009) Assessing the protection function of Alpine forest ecosystems using BGC modelling theory. In: European Geoscience Union (eds) Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol. 11, EGU 2009-12049Google Scholar
  29. Rhee H, Fridley JL, Foltz RB (2004) Modeling erosion from unpaved forest roads at various levels of geometric detail using the WEPP model. Trans ASABE 47(3):961–968Google Scholar
  30. Running SW, Hunt ER Jr (1993) Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. In: Ehleringer JR, Field CB (eds) Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI (1986) Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci Soc Am J vol.50:1031–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Global Change Biol vol.9:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornton PE (1998) Description of a numerical simulation model for predicting the dynamics of energy, water, carbon and nitrogen in a terrestrial ecosystem. Ph.D. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MTGoogle Scholar
  34. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol vol.190:214–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thornton PE, Law BE, Gholz HL, Clark L, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein AH, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Falk M, Dhen J, Sparks JP (2002) Modelling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needle leaf forests. Agric For Meteorol vol.113:185–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang E, Zhang L, Cresswell H, Hickel K (2006) Comparison of top-down and bottom-up models for simulation of water balance as affected by seasonality, vegetation type and spatial land use. In: Voinov A, Jakeman AJ, Rizzoli AE (eds) Proceedings of the iEMSs third biennial meeting: “summit on environmental modelling and software”. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Burlington, USA, July 2006Google Scholar
  37. Wemple BC, Jones JA, Grant GE (1996) Channel network extension by logging roads in two basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resour Bull 32(6):1195–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, Timbal B, Whetton P, Mearns LO (2004) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methods. Supporting material for the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Accessed 10 June 2009
  39. Wilks DS (1999) Simultaneous stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation at multiple sites in complex terrain. Agric For Meteorol vol.96:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeide B (2003) The U-approach to forest modeling. Can J For Res vol.33:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhicheng Z (1995) Basic features of forest steppe in the loess plateau of China. Chin Geogr Sci 5(2):170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris S. Eastaugh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephan A. Pietsch
    • 1
  • Richard Petritsch
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Pötzelsberger
    • 1
  • Hubert Hasenauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest and Soil SciencesBOKU University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Silviculture, ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations