Advertisement

Changes in Forest Cover and its Diversity

  • Viliam PichlerEmail author
  • Paulo Godinho-Ferreira
  • Tzvetan Zlatanov
  • Magdaléna Pichlerová
  • Juraj Gregor
Chapter
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 212)

Abstract

Current forest cover of Europe differs not only from its past area or pattern, but also from Europe’s potential vegetation. This is a result of two main factors, i.e. climate changes and the anthropogenic influence. Both factors have affected tree species composition of forests, forest coverage, fragmentation, the structure of forest ecosystems, as well as their texture. Generally, they acted in opposite ways: while the easing of harsh climate after the last glaciation facilitated the re-colonisation of land by trees and further development of forest ecosystems, forest areas have been reduced and fragmented, and their structure and biodiversity diminished due to human activities. A reversal of the latter trend occurred during the last century in Europe, a process also called forest cover transition. It has been initiated and sustained by the decline of agriculture and population drift into urban areas. This trend has enabled both natural and artificial reforestation and/or afforestation, respectively. It is necessary to understand these changes because of their profound impact on both current forest management options and the water cycle. Various modes of impact may result from distinct ecophysiological responses of tress to the soil water content, interception and water channelling through forest canopies, coarse woody debris and surface humus layer, as well as structures and force fields created by tree roots and soil edaphone. Thus, projected scenarios of the development of European forests in the next decades imply multiple effects on the water cycle.

Keywords

Forest Management Forest Cover Coarse Woody Debris European Beech Tree Species Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Parts of this work have been funded by the APVV project No. 0468/06 and VEGA 1/0723/08 related to FP0601.

References

  1. Alcamo J, Moreno JM, Nováky B, Bindi M, Corobov R, Devoy RJN, Giannakopoulos C, Martin E, Olesen JE, Shvidenko A (2007) Europe. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian O, Bernhardt A (1993) Anthropogenic landscape changes in Central Europe and the role of bioindication. Lands Ecol 8:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behre K-E (1988) The role of man in European vegetation history. In: Huntley B, Webb T (eds.) Vegetation History. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht-Boston-LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell S, Apostol D (2008) Designing sustainable forest landscapes. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bemmann A, Pretzsch J, Schulte A (2008) Baumplantagen weltweit – eine Übersicht. Schweiz Z Forstwes 159:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder R (1962) Settlers in the upper Hron Valley. (In Slovak). Stredoslovenské vyd. Banská Bystrica, Central SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohn U, Gollub G, Hettwer C, Neuhäuslová Z, Raus T, Schlüter H, Weber H (2004) Map of the natural vegetation of Europe. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, BonnGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolte A, Czajkowski T, Kompa T (2007) The north-eastern distribution range of European beech –a review. Forestry 80:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brang P (2005) Virgin Forests as a knowledge source for Central European silviculture: Reality or Myth? For Snow Landsc Res 79(1/2):19–31Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw RHW (2004) Past anthropogenic influence on genetic structure and diversity within European forests. For Ecol Manag 197:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradshaw RHW, Holmqvist BH, Cowling SA, Sykes MT (2000) The effects of climate change on the distribution and management of Picea abies in southern Scandinavia. Can J Forest Res 30:1992–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradshaw RHW, Mitchell FJG (1999) The palaeoecological approach to reconstructing former grazing-vegetation interactions. For Ecol Manag 120:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bublinec E, Pichler V (eds) (2001) Slovak primeval forests – diversity and conservation. IFE SAS, ZvolenGoogle Scholar
  14. Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coldea G (2003) The alpine flora and vegetation of the South-Eastern Carpathians. In: Nagy L, Grabherr G, Körner C, Thompson DBA (eds) Alpine Biodiversity in Europe. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Diaci J (2002) Regeneration dynamics in a Norway spruce plantation on silver fir-beech forest site in the Slovenian Alps. For Ecol Manag 161:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dolman AJ, Moors EJ, Grunwald T, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C (2003) Factors controlling forest atmosphere exchange of water, energy, and carbon. In: Valentini R (ed) Fluxes of carbon water and energy of European forests. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Eucken W (1950) The Foundations of economics: History and theory in the analysis of economic reality. William Hodge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment (2001) FAO forestry paper 140. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2005). Global Forest Resources Assessment (2005) FAO forestry paper 147. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2009) State of world’s forests. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Hetherington ED (1987) The importance of forests in the hydrological regime. In: Healy MC, Wallace RR (eds) Canadian aquatic resources. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  23. Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data’. Science 105:367–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holdridge LR, Grenke WC, Hatheway WH, Liang T, Tosi JA (1971) Forest environments in tropical life zones: a pilot study. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. IUCN (2004) Evaluation of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List. Report to the World Heritage Committee 28th Session, June/July 2004 – Suzhou, China. WHC-WHC-04/28.COM/INF.14BGoogle Scholar
  26. Kankaanpää S, Carter TR (2004) An overview of forest policies affecting land use in Europe. Finnish Environment Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauppi PE (1996) What is changing in the global environment? In: Korpilahti E, Mikkelä H, Salonen T (eds) Caring for the forest: research in a changing world. IUFRO Congress Report, Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenderes K, Mihók B, Standovár T (2008) Thirty years of gap dynamics in a central European beech forest reserve. Forestry 81:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimmins JP (1997) Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Korpeľ Š (1989) Pralesy Slovenska (Primeval forests of Slovakia, in Slovak). Veda, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  31. Korpeľ Š (1995) Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Fischer, Stuttgart/JenaGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozak J (2003) Forest cover changes in the Western Carpathians over the past 180 years: a case study from the Orawa region in Poland. Mt Res Dev 23:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krippel E (1986) Postglaciálny vývoj vegetácie Slovenska (Postglacial development of vegetation in Slovakia, in Slovak). Veda, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  34. Kutsch WL, Herbst M, Vanselow R, Hummelshøj P, Jensen NO, Kappen L (2001) Stomatal acclimation influences water and carbon fluxes of a beech canopy in northern Germany. Basic Appl Ecol 2:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lang H, Bork HR, Mäckel N, Preston R, Wunderlich J, Dikau R (2003) Changes in sediment flux and storage within a fluvial system – some examples from the Rhine catchment. Hydrol Process 17:3321–3334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leibundgut H (1993) Europäische Urwälder. Haupt, Bern/StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  37. Magri G, Vendramin G, Comps B, Dupanloup I, Geburek T, Gömöry D, Latalowa M, Litt T, Paule L, Roure JM, Tantau I, van der Knaap WO, Petit RJ, de Beaulieu JL (2006) A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol 117:199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maracchi G, Sirotenko O, Bindi M (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Clim Change 70:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mindas J, Skvarenina J (eds) (2003) Forests and global climate change (in Slovak, with English abstract). EFRA Zvolen/FRI Zvolen, Zvolen, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Nabuurs GJ, Päivinen R, Pussinen A, Schelhaas, MJ (2003) Development of European forests until 2050 – a projection of forests and forest management in thirty countries. EFI Research Report 15. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Nagel TA, Diaci J (2006) Intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth beech-fir forest in Southeastern Slovenia. Can J For Res 36:629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parviainen J, Bücking W, Schuck A, Päivinen R (2000) Strict forest reserves in Europe: efforts to enhance biodiversity and research on forests left for free development in Europe (EU-COST-Action E4). Forestry 73:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pichler V, Hamor F, Vološčuk I, Sukharyuk D (2007) Outstanding universal value of the ecological processes in the Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and their management as World Heritage Sites. Acta Ecol, Veda, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  44. Pitkänen A, Huttunen P, Jungner H, Merilainen J, Tolonen K (2003) Holocene fire history of middle boreal pine forest sites in eastern Finland. Ann Bot Fenn 40:15–33Google Scholar
  45. Plesník P (2004) Všeobecná biogeografia (General Biogeography, in Slovak). Comenius University, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  46. Plesník P (1972) Obere Waldgrenze in den Gebirgen Europas von den Pyrenäen bis zum Kaukasus. In: Troll C (ed) Geoecology of the high-mountain regions of Eurasia. Franz Steiner Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  47. Ponge JF (2003) Humus forms in terrestrial ecosystems: a framework to biodiversity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:935–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pretzsch H (2005) Diversity and productivity in forests: Evidence from long-term experimental plots. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner Ch, Schulze E-D (eds) Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems, vol 176, Ecol Stud. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  49. Rackham O (1990) Trees and woodland in the British landscape. Phoenix Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Risch AC, Heiri C, Bugmann H (2005) Simulating structural forest patterns with a forest gap model: a model evaluation. Ecol Model 181:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raev I, Asan U, Grozev O (1997) Accumulation of CO2 in the above-ground biomass of the forests in Turkey and Bulgaria in the recent decades. XI World Forestry Congress, Turkey. pp. 131–138Google Scholar
  52. Röhle H, Böcker L, Feger K-H, Petzold R, Wolf H, Wael A (2008) Anlage und Ertragsaussichten von Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Ostdeutschland. Schweiz Z Forstwes 159:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environ Change 15:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmidt P, Gerold D (2008) Kurzumtriebsplantagen – Ergänzung oder Widerspruch zur nachhaltigen Waldwirtschaft? Schweiz Z Forstwes 159:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuck A, Päivinen R, Häme T, Van Brusselen J, Kennedy P, Folving S (2003) Compilation of a European forest map from Portugal to the Ural mountains based on earth observation data and forest statistics. Forest Policy Econ 5:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shiklomanov IA, Krestovsky OI (1988) The influence of forests and forest reclamation practice on streamflow and water balance. In: Reynolds ERC, Thompson FB (eds) Forests, climate, and hydrology: regional impacts. United Nations University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  57. Simpson M, Pichler V, Martin S, Brouwer R (2009) Integrating forest recreation and nature tourism into the rural economy. In: Bell S, Simpson M, Tyrväinen L, Sievänen T, Pröbstl U (eds) European Forest Recreation and Tourism. Taylor & Francis, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Sims RE (1973) The anthropogenic factor in East Anglian vegetational history: an approach using APF techniques. In: Birds HJB, West RG (eds) Quaternary plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Sykes MT, Prentice IC (1995) Boreal forest futures: modelling the controls on tree species range limits and transient responses to climate change. Water Air Soil Poll 82:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Glob Change Biol 10:2020–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CAB International, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vertessy RA, Watson FGR, O’Sullivan SK (2001) Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. Forest Ecol Manag 143:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zweifel R, Steppe K, Sterck F-J (2007) Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. J Exp Bot 58:2113–2131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viliam Pichler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paulo Godinho-Ferreira
    • 2
  • Tzvetan Zlatanov
    • 3
  • Magdaléna Pichlerová
    • 4
  • Juraj Gregor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural EnvironmentTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovakia
  2. 2.Departamento de EcologiaRecursos Naturais e Ambiente, Estação Florestal NacionalOeirasPortugal
  3. 3.Forest Research InstituteSofiaBulgaria
  4. 4.Department of Landscape Planning and DesignTechnical University in ZvolenZvolenSlovakia

Personalised recommendations