Abstract
Students routinely complete their school mathematical careers never realizing the significance of mathematics in understanding important social, political, and economic issues facing our communities and our world. This is a form of societal negligence that many educators, and others, recognize must change. To pursue agendas of quality and equity in mathematics education will require rethinking both traditional and reform-based disciplinary representations of “common sense.” Specifically, mathematics education must revisit education’s very roots, working to balance emphases on mathematics content, pedagogy, and purpose. This chapter describes current research efforts and challenges in the Mathematics Education in the Public Interest (MEPI) project. We contextualize our efforts in broader research-based frameworks for improving mathematics education in pursuit of quality and equity agendas, while also communicating our own understandings of quality and equity.
The research described in this paper is part of the Mathematics Education in the Public Interest project, funded by the National Science Foundation, award number DUE-0837467. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation Mathematics Education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92.
Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.
Atweh, B., Forgasz, H., & Nebres, B. (Eds.). (2001). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Boaler, J. (1998). Experiencing school mathematics. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2005). Transforming students’ lives through an equitable mathematics approach: The case of Railside School. http://math.csudh.edu/MathProject/biblio.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2009.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
Boylan, M. (2009). Engaging with issues of emotionality in mathematics teacher education for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 427–443.
Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nassir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.
DeFreitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2009). Using social semiotics to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 187–203.
Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third R—radical maths. London: Free Association Books.
Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170.
Goodell, J. E., & Parker, L. H. (2001). Creating a connected, equitable mathematics classroom: Facilitating gender equity. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 411–431). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Goodlad, J. (2004). Fulfilling the public purpose of schooling. School Administrator, 61(5), 14–17.
Green, J. E., & Weaver, R. A. (1992). Who aspires to teach? A descriptive study of preservice teachers. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 234–238.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.
Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.
Hart, D., Donnelly, T. M., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.
Hollins, E. R., & Guzman, M. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477–548). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Knapp, M. S., & Woolverton, S. (2003). Social class and schooling. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 656–681). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 103–125.
Malloy, C. E. (2008). Looking throughout the world for democratic access to mathematics. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 20–31). New York: Routledge.
Mistele, J., & Spielman, L. J. (2009). The impact of “Math for Social Analysis” on math anxiety in elementary preservice teachers. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 12(4), 93–97.
Moll, L. C., & Gonzalez, N. (2004). A funds-of-knowledge approach to multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 699–715). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston: Beacon Press.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The condition of education. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/. Accessed 8 Oct 2005.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nolan, K. (2009). Mathematics in and through social justice: another misunderstood marriage. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 205–216.
Oakes, J., Joseph, R., & Muir, K. (2004). Access and achievement in mathematics and science. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 69–90). New York: Jossey-Bass.
Orrill, R. (2001). Preface: Mathematics, numeracy, and democracy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. xiii–xx). Princeton: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.
Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: Macmillan.
Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Smith, D. E. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.
Spielman, L. J. (2008). Equity in mathematics education: Unions and intersections of feminist and social justice literature. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 647–657.
Spielman, L. J. (2009, September). Mathematics education in the public interest: Preservice teachers’ engagement with and reframing of mathematics. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American chapter for the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME-NA), Atlanta.
Spielman, L. J., & Mistele, J. (2010, April). Do not do “Connect the Dots”: Mathematics lessons with social issues. Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Denver.
Stocker, D. (2006). Maththatmatters. Toronto: CCPA Education Project.
Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.
Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.
Usiskin, Z. (2001). Quantitative literacy for the next generation. In A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 79–86). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the demographic profile. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 111–156). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jacobsen, L.J., Mistele, J. (2010). Mathematics Education: What is the Point?. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)