Skip to main content

Mathematics Education: What is the Point?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education
  • 2572 Accesses

Abstract

Students routinely complete their school mathematical careers never realizing the significance of mathematics in understanding important social, political, and economic issues facing our communities and our world. This is a form of societal negligence that many educators, and others, recognize must change. To pursue agendas of quality and equity in mathematics education will require rethinking both traditional and reform-based disciplinary representations of “common sense.” Specifically, mathematics education must revisit education’s very roots, working to balance emphases on mathematics content, pedagogy, and purpose. This chapter describes current research efforts and challenges in the Mathematics Education in the Public Interest (MEPI) project. We contextualize our efforts in broader research-based frameworks for improving mathematics education in pursuit of quality and equity agendas, while also communicating our own understandings of quality and equity.

The research described in this paper is part of the Mathematics Education in the Public Interest project, funded by the National Science Foundation, award number DUE-0837467. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation Mathematics Education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atweh, B., Forgasz, H., & Nebres, B. (Eds.). (2001). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1998). Experiencing school mathematics. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2005). Transforming students’ lives through an equitable mathematics approach: The case of Railside School. http://math.csudh.edu/MathProject/biblio.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2009.

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, M. (2009). Engaging with issues of emotionality in mathematics teacher education for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nassir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFreitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2009). Using social semiotics to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third R—radical maths. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodell, J. E., & Parker, L. H. (2001). Creating a connected, equitable mathematics classroom: Facilitating gender equity. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 411–431). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (2004). Fulfilling the public purpose of schooling. School Administrator, 61(5), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. E., & Weaver, R. A. (1992). Who aspires to teach? A descriptive study of preservice teachers. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Donnelly, T. M., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, E. R., & Guzman, M. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 477–548). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. S., & Woolverton, S. (2003). Social class and schooling. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 656–681). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, C. E. (2008). Looking throughout the world for democratic access to mathematics. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 20–31). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistele, J., & Spielman, L. J. (2009). The impact of “Math for Social Analysis” on math anxiety in elementary preservice teachers. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 12(4), 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., & Gonzalez, N. (2004). A funds-of-knowledge approach to multicultural education. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 699–715). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The condition of education. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/. Accessed 8 Oct 2005.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, K. (2009). Mathematics in and through social justice: another misunderstood marriage. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J., Joseph, R., & Muir, K. (2004). Access and achievement in mathematics and science. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 69–90). New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrill, R. (2001). Preface: Mathematics, numeracy, and democracy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. xiii–xx). Princeton: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, L. J. (2008). Equity in mathematics education: Unions and intersections of feminist and social justice literature. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 647–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, L. J. (2009, September). Mathematics education in the public interest: Preservice teachers’ engagement with and reframing of mathematics. Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American chapter for the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME-NA), Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, L. J., & Mistele, J. (2010, April). Do not do “Connect the Dots”: Mathematics lessons with social issues. Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, D. (2006). Maththatmatters. Toronto: CCPA Education Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usiskin, Z. (2001). Quantitative literacy for the next generation. In A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 79–86). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the demographic profile. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 111–156). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura J. Jacobsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobsen, L.J., Mistele, J. (2010). Mathematics Education: What is the Point?. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics