Abstract
This chapter presents findings from an analysis of data from participants in a bi-annual international mathematics education conference with regard to the practical realisation of objectives relating to inclusion and quality in the conference. The chapter presents the context and objectives of the organising Society and its interpretation of objectives in operationalising a conference. It examines, theoretically, issues relating to inclusion of participants and quality of scientific work in the context of such a conference. It presents findings related to analysis of three sources of data—evaluation questionnaires from participants at the end of a conference, interviews with participants during a conference and comments from group leaders written during and after a conference. Finally, it synthesises from issues raised and relates these to theoretical issues, presenting a tentative framework for creating and evaluating a conference which has principled objectives with relation to quality and inclusion.
The authors of this chapter have been deeply involved in ERME development. João Pedro da Ponte was Chair of the Programme Committee for CERME 3 in Italy; M. Alessandra Mariotti was the local organiser of CERME 3 and a member of the ERME Board from 2005 to 2010; Barbara Jaworski was Chair of the Programme Committee for CERME 4 in Spain, member of the ERME Board from 2003 to 2008 and President of ERME 2005–2008. Ponte and Jaworski were members of the group at Osnabrück initiating ERME.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It was decided to establish ERME legally with charitable foundation in the UK, and this is now finalised with a formal Constitution and Bye-laws. With a solid legal foundation, ERME is now seeking to develop a strong financial footing.
- 2.
These are YERME events, known as the YESS 1,2,3,4 & 5 (YERME summer schools), taking place in alternate years to the CERME conferences.
References
Atweh, B. (2007). International interactions in mathematics education. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 171–186). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
Atweh, B., Clarkson, P., & Nebres, B. (2003). Mathematics education in international and global context. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpartick, & F. Leung (Eds.), The second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 185–229). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Atweh, B., Keitel, C. (2007). Social justice in international collaborations. In B. Atweh, M. Borba, A. Calabrese Barton, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 95–112). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Atweh, B., Boero, P., Jurdak, M., Nebres, B., & Valero, P. (2008). International cooperation in mathematics education: Promises and challenges. In M. Niss & E. Emborg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 10), July 4–11, 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 443–447). Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Burton, L. (Ed.). (2005). Which way social justice in mathematics education. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Cotton, T. (2001). Mathematics teaching in the real world. In P. Gates (Ed.). Issues in mathematics teaching (23–37). London: Routledge/Falmer.
Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 161–170.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the post-modern age. London: Cassell.
Jaworski, B., & Phillips, D. (1999). Looking abroad: International comparisons and the teaching of mathematics in Britain. In B. Jaworski & D. Phillips (Eds.), Comparing standards internationally: Research and practice in mathematics and beyond (pp. 7–22). Oxford: Symposium Books.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Prediger, S., Arzarello, F., Bosch, M, & Lenfant, A. (2008). Comparing, combining, coordinating—networking strategies for connecting theoretical approaches. ZDM, 40(2), 163–340.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Changing contexts in tertiary mathematics: Implications for diversity and equity. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 13–26). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaworski, B., Ponte, J.P., Mariotti, M.A. (2010). The CERME Spirit: Issues of Quality and Inclusion in an Innovative Conference Style. In: Atweh, B., Graven, M., Secada, W., Valero, P. (eds) Mapping Equity and Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9802-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9803-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)