Abstract
In this chapter, we make a case for considering culture in research on teachers’ mathematical knowledge, and we review Chapters 7-10 with a focus on the interplay between the cultural context and mathematical knowledge for/in teaching. Our review illuminates three different, but complementary, aspects of the cultural embedding of mathematical knowledge for/in teaching. The first aspect, which is represented by the chapters of Andrews and Pepin, situates mathematical knowledge in teaching in the context of different national educational systems. The second aspect, which is represented by the chapter of Adler and Davis, situates mathematical knowledge for teaching in the context of diverse teacher education programmes. The final aspect, which is represented by the chapter of Williams, situates mathematical knowledge for teaching in the culture of a ‘knowledge economy’. We conclude by considering implications of the four chapters for teacher education research and practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For an overview of this argument, see Dale (2000).
- 2.
In interpreting and describing Williams’s view, we paraphrased an expression attributed to McLuhan (1964, 1994) in Lewis H. Lapham’s introduction to the 1994 edition of Understanding Media: “we shape our tools and then our tools shape us” (p. xi). McLuhan’s actual quotation seems to be that “the beholding of idols, or the use of technology conforms men to them” (p. 45).
- 3.
We use “teacher education” broadly to include both the initial training of pre-service teachers and the continued professional development of in-service teachers.
- 4.
The apprenticeship-of-observation is a process through which students internalise (in the most part unconsciously) the practices of their own teachers. Lortie (1975) commented on the apprenticeship-of-observation: “[T]he apprenticeship-of-observation undergone by all who enter teaching begins the process of socialization in a particular way; it acquaints students with the tasks of the teacher and fosters the development of identifications with teachers” (p. 67).
- 5.
According to Stigler and Hiebert (1999), people within an educational system share a mental picture of what teaching is like, that is, they share a “cultural script for teaching.” A major factor involved in the development of teachers’ cultural scripts for teaching is the apprenticeship-of-observation. Indeed, Stigler and Hiebert (1999) argued that “we learn how to teach indirectly, through years of participation in classroom life, and that we are largely unaware of some of the most widespread attributes of teaching in our own culture” (p. 11).
References
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, Edmonton, AB.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 179–191.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.
Bullough, R. V. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 655–666.
Castro, A. M. (2006). Preparing elementary preservice teachers to use mathematics curriculum materials. The Mathematics Educator, 16(2), 14–24.
Cogan, L., & Schmidt, W. H. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 68–85). London, UK: Falmer Press.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”?. Educational Theory, 50, 427–448.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Davis, Z. (2001). Measure for measure: Evaluative judgment in school mathematics pedagogic texts. Pythagoras, 56, 2–11.
Delaney, S. (2008). Adapting and using U.S. measures to study Irish teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Delaney, S., Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Zopf, D. (2008). “Mathematical knowledge for teaching”: Adapting U.S. measures for use in Ireland. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 171–197.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3–56.
Gerdes, P. (1998). On culture and mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 33–53.
Gibson, C. B., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. (2001). Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 274–303.
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. London: Allen Lane (Penguin Group).
Harachi, T. W., Choi, Y., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., & Bliesner, S. L. (2006). Examining equivalence of concepts and measures in diverse samples. Prevention Science, 7, 359–368.
Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 75–96.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES 2003–013). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
McLuhan, M. (1964, 1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Merritt, A. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: Do Hofstede’s dimensions replicate? Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 31, 283–301.
Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Violence and regional U.S. culture. American Psychologist, 48, 441–449.
Padilla, K., Ponce-de-León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of ‘amount of substance’. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1389–1404.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Simon, M. A. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233–254.
Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 639–663.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J.. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Straus, M. A. (1969). Phenomenal identity and conceptual equivalence of measurement in cross-national comparative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 233–239.
Stylianides, G. J. (2007). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191–215.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stylianides, A.J., Delaney, S. (2011). The Cultural Dimension of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge. In: Rowland, T., Ruthven, K. (eds) Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching. Mathematics Education Library, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9765-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9766-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)