Advertisement

Introduction

  • Paul CobbEmail author
  • Koeno Gravemeijer
  • Erna Yackel
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 48)

Abstract

The emergent perspective described in Chapter 4 serves to orient the analysis of the teacher’s and students’ actions and interactions in particular mathematics classrooms. As noted in Chapter 4, this framework was developed while analyzing the data generated in the course of two year-long classroom design experiments (an initial experiment conducted with Erna Yackel and Terry Wood in Graceann Merkel’s second-grade classroom in a rural suburban school, and a follow-up experiment that Erna Yackel conducted in Willie King’s second-grade classroom in an urban school). One of the key characteristics of design research is that instructional design and research are interdependent. Current descriptions of the methodology emphasize that the design of classroom learning environments serves as the context for research and, conversely, ongoing and retrospective analyses are conducted in order to inform the improvement of the design. It is fair to say that our primary focus while conducting the design experiment in Merkel’s classroom was on the research aspect of design research – on attempting to understand what was going on in the classrooms in which we worked. To be sure, Yackel, Wood, and I developed a complete set of instructional activities for second-grade mathematics. However, our motivation for doing so was pragmatic: instructional activities were a means to the end of supporting the forms of mathematical learning that we wanted to study given our view about what was worth knowing and doing mathematically.

Keywords

Instructional Design Mathematical Learning Instructional Activity Learning Trajectory Classroom Learning Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-ß Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, J. S. (1996). Conducting developmental research in a technology-enhanced classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers, J. S., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999). The evolution of mathematical practices: A case study. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. W. (1997). Symbolizing and mathematizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Design-Based Research Collaborative. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freudenthal, H. (1988). Ontwikkelingsonderzoek [Developmental research]. In K. Gravemeijer & K. Koster (Eds.), Onderzoek, Ontwikkeling en Ontwikkelingsonderzoek. Utrecht, Netherlands: OW&OC.Google Scholar
  12. Gorman, M. E. (2002). Levels of expertise and trading zones: A framework for multidisciplinary collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 32, 933–938.Google Scholar
  13. Gravemeijer, K. (1994a). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-ß Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gravemeijer, K. (1994b). Educational development and developmental research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J. S., & Whitenack, J. W. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225–274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001a). Supporting students’ ability to reason about data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001b). The development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 234–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGatha, M. (2000). Instructional design in the context of classroom-based research: Documenting the learning of a research team as it engaged in a mathematics design experiment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
  22. Neuman, D. (1987). The origin of arithmetic skills: A phenomenographic approach. Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis (Goteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 62).Google Scholar
  23. Sfard, A. (1994). Reflection as the birth of metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  24. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teacher, 77, 20–26.Google Scholar
  26. Stephan, M. (1998). Supporting the development of one first-grade classroom’s conceptions of measurement: Analyzing students’ learning in social context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  27. Stephan, M., Bowers, J., & Cobb, P. (Eds.). (2003). Supporting students’ development of measuring conceptions: Analyzing students’ learning in social context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  28. Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education. A paradigm of developmental research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In 1994 yearbook of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 165–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the Fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 229–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, P. W. (1996). Imagery and the development of mathematical reasoning. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 267–285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction – The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar
  34. Treffers, A. (1990). Rekentof twintig met het rekenrek [Addition and subtraction up to twenty with the arithmetic rack.] Willem Bartjens, 10(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  35. Treffers, A. (1991). Meeting innumeracy at primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitenack, J. W. (1995). Modeling, mathematics, and mathematical learning as it is situated in the classroom microculture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Teaching & Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Purdue University CalumetHammondUSA

Personalised recommendations