Skip to main content

Demographic Change and the Implications for Commercial Forestry: Lessons from South-East Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demographic Change in Australia's Rural Landscapes

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 12))

  • 1865 Accesses

Abstract

Plantation forestry policy in Australia is driven by a strategy with a notional target of trebling plantations from 1 million ha to 3 million ha between 1997 and 2020. Development of new plantations is focused on agricultural land in the high rainfall regions of Australia – the most densely populated part of the country, with rural landscapes undergoing profound change in demographics, employment, land tenure and management, and evidence of the decoupling of land prices and agricultural returns from the land as new settlers enter the rural property market. Results of plantation expansion were compared in two case study regions – the Murray Valley and the Green Triangle – in south-east Australia known to be undergoing differential rates of socio-economic change. In the Murray Valley region, a multifunctional landscape in that socio-economic change was bringing about more diversity and complexity in the way that rural landscapes were operated and used, plantation forestry had experienced difficulty in meeting expansion targets because of the high price of land driven primarily by buyers from Melbourne, and the generally low social acceptability of forestry. Further, the management of existing plantations was becoming more complex as a consequence of new neighbours with different values to long-term farmers. In contrast, in the Green Triangle, which was comprised of agricultural production and transitional landscapes, plantation expansion was occurring at a rate broadly expected by the forestry industry. Key strategies to increase the social acceptability of forestry in multifunctional landscapes, including integrated forestry development, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Regions that receive, on average, at least 600 mm of annual rainfall.

  2. 2.

    There are 15 National Plantation Inventory regions in Australia that form the basis for regional reporting of plantation statistics (Wood et al. 2001).

  3. 3.

    An LGA is a spatial unit in the Australian Standard Geographical Classification that is commonly used by the Australian Bureau of Statistics to disseminate demographic statistics (ABS 2001).

  4. 4.

    The rate of expansion in the Murray Valley region during 2001–2007 was 14,960 ha compared with 97,936 ha for the Green Triangle region (Gavran and Parsons 2008, p. 4; Wood et al. 2001, p. 19).

  5. 5.

    Population statistics are based on analysis of enumerated population excluding overseas visitors.

  6. 6.

    Nominal money value is the dollar value over time, in terms of the actual face value at each particular point in time. Real money value is the dollar value over time, with the effect of changes in purchasing power removed (Makeham and Malcolm 1988, p. 148).

  7. 7.

    As measured by the change in the total estimated value of agricultural operations for 1997 and 2001, expressed in 2001 dollars, with data at the level of LGA aggregated for each of the case study regions (ABS 2007).

  8. 8.

    ‘Land capability’ is the identification of land where the biophysical growth requirements of a particular tree species are satisfied for a given management regime, whereas ‘land suitability’ involves the integration of biophysical factors and social and economic factors affecting the fitness of land for plantations (Stephens et al. 1998, pp. 5–6). Existing land-use, land price and distance to existing or notional markets are common attributes used to assess the suitability of land for forestry.

  9. 9.

    In comparison, in the Green Triangle region, 1.4 million ha of land was assessed as having the capability for Radiata Pine plantations (Burns et al. 1999, pp. 95–96).

  10. 10.

    Since 1998, privately-funded forestry managed investment schemes have been the main source of capital for expansion of plantations in Australia (Cummine 2009).

  11. 11.

    Rural properties purchased by urban people for lifestyle purposes.

  12. 12.

    Across Victoria during the decade 1996–1997 to 2005–2006, farm business profit was negative for every year (ABARE 2007).

  13. 13.

    The term ‘integrated forestry’ as used here is consistent with the terminology of Robins and Marcar (2007, p. 8) in that it describes the establishment and management of trees on agricultural land for profit (both direct and indirect benefits), as compared to ‘environmental plantings’ established primarily for non-commercial purposes. Integrated forestry includes larger blocks of plantations managed by forestry companies on owned or leased land, smaller blocks of farm forestry managed by forestry companies and/or landowners, and agroforestry in which commercial trees are incorporated with pastures, for example configured as timberbelts (Robins and Marcar 2007). A vision of this latter land-use was presented by Reid (2008).

References

  • Alston JM (1986) An analysis of growth of US farmland prices. Am J Agric Econ 68:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston M (2004) Who is down on the farm? Social aspects of Australian agriculture in the 21st century. Agric Hum Values 21:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argent N (2002) From pillar to post? In search of the post-productivist countryside in Australia. Aust Geogr 33:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) (2002) Australian farm surveys report 2002. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) (2006) Australian commodity statistics 2006. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) (2007) AgSurf interactive data. Retrieved July 3, 2007 from http://www.abareconomics.com/interactive/agsurf/

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2001) Statistical geography volume 1: Australian standard geographical classification (ASGC) 2001 (Cat. No. 1216.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2003) Time series profile: 1991–2001 (Cat. No. 2003.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2007) Agriculture statistics (customised data from the agricultural census 1997 and 2001, agricultural survey 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005). Neil Clark and Associates, Bendigo

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr N (2005) The changing social landscape of rural Victoria. Victorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Tatura

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr N, Wilkinson R (2005) Social persistence of plant-based management of dryland salinity. Aust J Exp Agric 45:1495–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr N, Wilkinson R, Karunaratne K (2005) Understanding rural Victoria. Retrieved March 10, 2006, from Department of Primary Industries Web site: http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/nrenfa.nsf/LinkView/E7CCC81CD1D09B57CA25706C00276AB43D41311798DC2D5BCA256F4200834BAC

  • Baum S (2006) A typology of socio-economic advantage and disadvantage in Australia’s large non-metropolitan cities, towns and regions. Aust Geogr 37:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørkhaug H, Richards CA (2008) Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia. J Rural Stud 24:98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borschmann R (1998) Plantation productivity potential of blue gum and radiata pine for north east Victoria. Plantations North East Inc, Wangaratta

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns K, Walker D, Hansard A (1999) Forest plantations on cleared agricultural land in Australia: a regional economic analysis (ABARE Research Report 99.11). Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron JN, Meynink R, Crawford H (2004) Regulation of private forestry in Victoria. MBAC Consulting, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Fulton M, Scott JT (1993) The inconsistency of land values, land rents, and capitalization formulas. Am J Agric Econ 75:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummine A (2009) MIS forestry will shape Australia’s future wood potential. Aust Farm J March 09:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD) (2008) Planning schemes online. Retrieved 8 October, 2008, Department of Planning and Community Development Web site: http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpl.nsf/LinkView/7C4B575857BC4EDECA257301001E855663DBC5DC485B987DCA2572FF0025D784

  • Department of Primary Industries (DPI) (2005) Farm monitor project: summary of results 2004–2005. Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Primary Industries (DPI) (2008) Future farming: productive, competitive and sustainable. Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) (2004) Victoria in Future 2004 – Victorian state government population and household projections 2001–2031. Retrieved April 28, 2006, http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/dse/dsenres.nsf/LinkView/BD4EF8A400A9E6DECA256D8D00151A4F775206E3E0281595CA256F0E0013C1FB

  • Evans N, Morris C, Winter M (2002) Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy. Prog Hum Geogr 26:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel M (2002) Australia’s regional youth exodus. J Rural Stud 18:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavran M, Parsons M (2008) Australia’s plantations 2008 inventory update. National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray I, Lawrence G (2001) A future for regional Australia: escaping global misfortune. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberkorn G, Kelson S, Tottenham R et al (2004) Country matters: social atlas of rural and regional Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J (2002) Diversity and change in Australia’s rangelands: a post-productivist transition with a difference? Trans Inst Br Geogr 27:362–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins P (1999, 3 March) $50 m boost for forestry. The Age, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugo G (2002) Changing patterns of population distribution in Australia. J Popul Res N Z Popul Rev Joint special issue:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KM, Beale CL (1994) The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Soc 59:655–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makeham JP, Malcolm LR (1988) The farming game. Gill Publications, Armidale

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather AS, Hill G, Nijnik M (2006) Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization? J Rural Stud 22:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan DA, Beale C (2002) Understanding rural population loss. Rural Am 17:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichiello V, Aroni R, Timewell E, Alexander L (1995) In-depth interviewing (2nd edn). Longman Australia, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest Inventory (NFI) (1997) National plantation inventory of Australia. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest Inventory (NFI) (2007) North east Victoria capability areas (customised data). Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons M, Gavran M, Davidson J (2006) Australia’s Plantations 2006. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantations 2020 Vision Implementation Committee (PVIC) (1997) Plantations for Australia: the 2020 vision. Plantations 2020 Vision Implementation Committee; Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantations North East (PNE) (2005) PNE strategic plan 2005 to 2007. Plantations North East Inc. (unpublished), Wangaratta

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantations for Australia: the 2020 Vision (PA) (2002) Plantations for Australia: the 2020 vision. Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.plantations2020.com.au/vision/2020vision.pdf

  • Potter C, Burney J (2002) Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO – legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? J Rural Stud 18:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (PC) (2005) Trends in Australian agriculture (Research Paper). Productivity Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Race D, Birckhead J, Curtis A et al (2005) Socio-economic profile of the Boorowa catchment, New South Wales. Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R (2008) A web of trees across the farming landscape. Town Ctry Farm 25:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of Australia (2006) Statement on monetary policy – May 2006. Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://www.rba.gov.au/PublicationsAndResearch/Statements OnMonetaryPolicy/May2006/inflation_trends_prospects.html

  • Robins L, Marcar N (2007) Integrated forestry on farmland: prospects for integrated forestry as a management tool for salt-source catchments. Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett H (2006) So, you want to be a successful farm business owner. Aust Farm Bus Rev 30:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt B (2006) The big picture: life, work and relationships in the 21st century. Hardie Grant Books, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt D, Lindenmayer D, Hobbs R (2004) Trees and biodiversity: a guide for Australian farm forestry (RIRDC Publication No. 03/047). Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens N, Sun D, Tickle P (1998) Plantation potential studies in Australia: an assessment of current status. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonts M, McManus P (2000) The restructuring of Australia’s rural communities. In: Pritchard B (ed) Land of discontent: the dynamics of change in rural and regional Australia . UNSW Press, Sydney, pp 52–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb T, Curtis A (2002) Mapping regional capacity. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood MS, Stephens NC, Allison BK et al (2001) Plantations of Australia – a report from the National Plantation Inventory and the National Farm Forestry Inventory. National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by an Australian Postgraduate Award (2005–2008), by Plantations North East Inc., and by a Writing Up Award (2009) provided by the Centre for Research and Graduate Training, Charles Sturt University (‘CSU’). Our thanks to the people who were interviewed for the research; to Jack Dunham, Valuer-General, Victoria, who provided rural property sales data for analysis; and to Simon McDonald from the Spatial Data Analysis Network, CSU, for assistance in acquiring demographic data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh T. L. Stewart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, H.T.L., Race, D., Curtis, A. (2010). Demographic Change and the Implications for Commercial Forestry: Lessons from South-East Australia. In: Luck, G., Black, R., Race, D. (eds) Demographic Change in Australia's Rural Landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics