Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Potential of Nanotechnology for Equitable Economic Development: The Case of Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 2))

  • 814 Accesses

Abstract

Luciano Kay and Philip Shapira take a more detailed look at the consequences of Brazilian nanotechnology, using publication and patent data. Brazil is the powerhouse of Latin America in terms of research output in nanotechnology, and national policy tries hard to link that output to innovation outcomes. However, as with most Brazilian science, the regional distribution is highly uneven, and nanotechnology shows no signs of equalizing it. Kay and Shapira examine Brazil’s performance on four criteria of equitable economic development: agenda setting; R&D investment; R&D outcomes; and risk awareness and allocation.

This chapter was peer reviewed. It was originally presented at the Workshop on Nanotechnology, Equity, and Equality at Arizona State University on November 22, 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, Jon, Charles Benjamin, Bruce Campbell, and Daniel Tiveau. 2006. Forests, poverty and equity in Africa: New perspectives on policy and practice. International Forestry Review 8(1): 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, Edward B. 2005. Natural resources and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, John C., Victoria L. Kramer and Susanna H. Priest. 2008. Expert opinion on nanotechnology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10(4): 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, Kirsten. 2008. Brazil. The natural knowledge economy. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • CGEE. 2007. Analise da pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicilios PNAD 2005. Livro 3: pobraza e desigualdade. Brasilia, DF: Centro de Gestao e Estudos Estrategicos (CGEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, Susan. E. 2007. Distributive justice in science and technology policy. Science and Public Policy 34(2): 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, Susan. E., Rob Hagendijk, Peter Healey, and Tiago Santos Pereira. 2007. A framework for analyzing science, technology and inequalities: Preliminary observations. ResIST: Researching Inequality through Science and Technology. Working Paper 3. Oxford: James Martin Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, Alexandra, O. 2003. Responses to questionnaire on nanotechnology: Brazil. Evidence to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering study on nanoscience and nanotechnologies. São Paulo: British Consulate General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, Gary. S. 2001. Distribution and development: A new look at the developing world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Lee, and Olav Sorenson. 2004. Science as a map in technological search, Strategic Management Journal 25(8–9): 909–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, Wolfgang, Jacqueline Leta, and Bart Thijs. 2006. Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics 67(1): 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, Wolfgang, Martin Meyer, M. Du Plessis, Bart Thijs, Tom Magerman, and Balazs Schlemmer. 2003. Nanotechnology, analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavor. Leuven: O&O Statistieken.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. 2007. IBGE divulga as contas regionais 2002–2005. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1039&id_pagina=1 (retrieved November 2, 2008).

  • Invernizzi, Noela. 2007. Los científicos brasileños legitiman las nanotecnologías. Red Latinoamericana de Nanotecnología y Sociedad—ReLANS. http://estudiosdeldesarrollo.net/relans/documentos/Noela-Visiones-esp.pdf. (retrieved December 12, 2007).

  • Invernizzi, Noela, and Guillermo Foladori. 2005. Nanotechnology and the developing world: Will nanotechnology overcome poverty or widen disparities? Nanotechnology Law & Business Journal 2: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Luciano, Noela Invernizzi, and Philip Shapira. 2009. The role of Brazilian firms in nanotechnology development. Paper presented at Atlanta Conference on Science and Technology, October 2009. http://www.cherry.gatech.edu/PUBS/09/Kay-Invernizzi-Shapira-09atlanta%20conf.pdf. (retrieved December 13, 2009).

  • Kay, Luciano, and Philip Shapira. 2009. Developing nanotechnology in Latin America. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11: 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, Marcelo. 2002. Nanoredes. http://www.comciencia.br/reportagens/nanotecnologia/nano11.htm. (retrieved October 20, 2008).

  • Lux. 2007. The nanotech report. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. 5th Ed. New York: Lux Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Andrew. D. 2006. Nanotechnology: assessing the risks. Nano Today 1: 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Richard R. Nelson. 2007. Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy 36(10): 1512–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCT. 2003. Programa de desenvolvimento da nanociência e da nanotecnologia. Proposta do Grupo de Trabalho criado pela Portaria MCT nº 252 como subsídio ao Programa de Desenvolvimento da Nanociência e da Nanotecnologia do PPA 2004–2007. http://www.mct.gov.br/upd_blob/0002/2361.pdf. (retrieved June 18, 2009).

  • MCT. 2006. Relatório nanotecnologia investimentos, resultados e demandas. Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Inovação (SETEC)—Coordenação-Geral de Micro e Nanotecnologias (CGNT). Brasília: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Joseph D., and Alberto J Cañas. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Pensacola, FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTSC. 2007. The national nanotechnology initiative: Strategic plan. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSEC. 2005. Brazil: Nanotechnology overview. São Paulo, Swiss Business Hub Brazil, Business Network Switzerland. http://www.osec.ch. (retrieved January 23, 2010).

  • Packer, Abel L., and Rogerio Meneghini. 2006. Articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions published from 1994 to 2003 with 100 or more citations: I—The weight of international collaboration and the role of the networks. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias 78: 841–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Alan L., Jan Youtie, Philip Shapira, and David J. Schoeneck. 2008. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10: 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEN. 2009. Inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market. Project on emerging nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/. (retrieved October 23, 2009).

  • Rediguieri, Carolina F. 2009. Study on the development of nanotechnology in advanced countries and in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 45: 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin, and Mihail C. Roco. 2006. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8: 153–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roco, Mihail C. 2003. Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5: 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roco, Mihail C. 2005. International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarano, Fabio. R. 2007. Perspectives on biodiversity science in Brazil. Scientia Agricola 64: 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Christine M. 2005. Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Stephan T., and Scott E. McNeil. 2008. Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited. Toxicological Sciences 101: 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2005. UNESCO science report 2005. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, Bart, Koenraad Debackere, Julie Callaert, Robert Tijssen and Thed van Leeuwen. 2006. Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains. Scientometrics 66: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, Peter. 2008. Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics 74: 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, James. 2004. The politics of small things: Nanotechnology, risk, and uncertainty. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Winter 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, Edward, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2007. Science policies for reducing societal inequities. Science and Public Policy 34: 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2005. World development report 2006: Equity and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, Jan, Philip Shapira, and Alan L. Porter. 2008a. National nanotechnology publications and citations. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10: 981–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, Jan, Maurizio Iacopetta, and Stuart J.H. Graham. 2008b. Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study uses data from the large-scale global nanotechnology publication and patent datasets developed by the group on Nanotechnology Research and Innovation Systems at Georgia Institute of Technology – a component of the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (CNS-ASU). Support for the research was provided through CNS-ASU with sponsorship from the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Luciano Kay & Philip Shapira

  2. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Philip Shapira

Authors
  1. Luciano Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip Shapira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Kay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Oak Brooke Way 1147, Atlanta, 30319, USA

    Susan E. Cozzens

  2. Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Jameson Wetmore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kay, L., Shapira, P. (2010). The Potential of Nanotechnology for Equitable Economic Development: The Case of Brazil. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation