Abstract
While many of the chapters in this book examine the economic differences between countries, the economy also structures unequal relationships within the workplace. Guillermo Foladori and Edgar Zayago Lau call attention to one such historical relationship that forms an important part of the context of the regulation of nanotechnology: the relationship between workers and managers. Past experience has taught workers not to trust management to watch out for their best interests when it comes to risk. Workers also have been relatively neglected in the technology assessment process, even though they are more likely than the general public to be exposed to new substances and production processes at a time when risk is unknown.
Originally presented at the Workshop on Nanotechnology, Equity, and Equality at Arizona State University on November 21, 2008. This chapter was peer-reviewed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Afsset (l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire de l’environnement et du travail). 2008. Les nanomatériaux. Sécurité au travail. http://www.afsset.fr/upload/bibliotheque/258113599692706655310496991596/afsset-nanomateriaux-2-avis-rapport-annexes-vdef.pdf. (accessed Novem-ber 6, 2008).
ATSM International (American Society for Testing and Materials). 2006. ASTM E2456-06 Standard terminology relating to nanotechnology. http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2456.htm. (accessed July 9, 2008).
Basf (Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik). 2008. Code of conduct nanotechnology. http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/sustainability/dialogue/in-dialogue-with-politics/nanotechnology/code-of-conduct. (accessed March 12, 2009).
Bayer. 2007. Bayer position on nanotechnology. http://www.baycareonline.com/nano_stewardship.asp. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Cambridge Public Health Department. 2008. Recommendations for a municipal health & safety policy for nanomaterials: A report to the Cambridge City Manager. http://www.loe.org/images/080801/NanoRecommendations.pdf. (accessed August 11, 2008).
Commission of the European Communities. 2008. On a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008. C(2008) 424 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Continental Western Insurance Group. 2008. Nanotubes and nanotechnology exclusion. Policy CW 33 69 06 08.
City of Berkeley. 2006. Manufactured nanoparticle health and safety disclosure. http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/citycouncil/2006citycouncil/packet/120506/2006-12-05%20Item%2013%20Manufactured%20Nanoparticle%20Health%20and%20Safety%20Disclosure.pdf. (accessed March 15, 2008).
DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), United Kingdom. 2008. The UK voluntary reporting scheme for engineered nanoscale materials. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/nanotech/documents/vrs-nanoscale.pdf. (accessed July 31, 2010).
DTSC (California Department of Toxic Substances Control). 2009. Chemical information call-in: Carbon nanotubes. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/Nanotechnology/index.cfm#Chemical_Information_Call-in:_Carbon_Nanotubes. (accessed March 3, 2009).
DuPont & Environmental Defense Fund. 2007. Nano risk framework executive summary. DuPont & Environmental Defense Fund. http://www.nanoriskframework.com/content.cfm?contentID=6498. (accessed March 22, 2008).
EPA-USA. 2007. Nanoscale program approach for comment. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/nmspfr.htm (accessed March 15, 2008).
ETC group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration). 2002. Patenting elements of nature. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/220/01/nanopatentsgeno.rtf.pdf. (accessed July 31, 2010).
FoE—A. (Friends of Earth—Australia). 2006. Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: small ingredients big risks. http://nano.foe.org.au/nanomaterials-sunscreens-and-cosmetics-small-ingredients-big-risks. (accessed July 31, 2010).
FSAI (Food Safety Authority of Ireland). 2008. The relevance for food safety of applications of nanotechnology in the food and feed industries. Dublin. http://www.fsai.ie/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=7858. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Goodman, Sara. 2009. Nanotech: EPA issues first nanomaterial rule. E&ENewsPM, May 24. http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/rss/2009/06/24/3. (accessed June 26, 2009). (subscription required).
Gupta Ray, Shashwat. 2009. Nanotech, a big way to beat recession. Sakaal Times, March 11.
Highfield, Roger. 2003. Prince asks scientists to look into ‘grey goo’. The Telegraph, June 5. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1431995/Prince-asks-scientists-to-look-into-grey-goo.html. (accessed July 31, 2010).
ICON (International Council on Nanotechnology). 2008. International council on nanotechnology. http://www.icon.rice.edu/. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Industrial Technology Research Institute. 2004. NanoMark. Industrial Development Bureau. Ministry of Economic Affairs. http://proj3.moeaidb.gov.tw/nanomark/Eng/. (accessed July 31, 2010).
ISO (International Organizations for Standardization). 2005. TC 229 Nanotechnologies. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_technical_committee?commid=381983. (accessed July 9, 2008).
Kimbrell, George. 2007. Broad international coalition issues principles for strong oversight of nanotechnology. http://www.icta.org/press/release.cfm?news_id=26. (accessed March 20, 2008).
Lewis, Sanford, Richard Liroff, Margaret Byrne, Mary S. Booth, and Bill Baue. 2008. Toxic stock syndrome: How corporate financial reports fail to apprise investors of the risks of product recalls and toxic liabilities. The Investor Environmental Health Network (IEHN). http://www.iehn.org/publications.reports.toxicstock.php. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Lloyd’s (2009). Nanotechnology: Balancing risk and opportunity. http://www.lloyds.com/News-and-Insight/News-and-Features/360-News/Emerging-Risk-360/Nanotechnology_balancing_risk_and_opportunity. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Lux Research, Inc. 2006. The Nanotech Report. 4th Edition. New York: Lux Research, Inc.
Mantovani, Elvio, Andrea Porcari, Christoph Meili, and Markus Widmer. 2009. Framing nano project: A multistakeholder dialogue platform framing the responsible development of nanosciences & nanotechnologies. Mapping Study on Regulation and Governance of Nanotechnologies. http://www.framingnano.eu (accessed March 10, 2009).
Miller, Georgia, Rye Senjen. (2008). Out of the Laboratory and Onto our Plates http://nano.foe.org.au/sites/default/files/Nanotechnology%20in%20food%20and%20agriculture%20-%20text%20only%20version_0.pdf. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Peiris, Manjari. 2008. State sector has to play an important role in riding present financial crisis urges Professor Tissa Vitarana. Asiantribune.com, November 21. http://www.merid.org/NDN/more.php?articleID=1590&search=%2FNDN%2Farchive.php%3FdoSearch%3D1%26implications%255B%255D%3DGovernance%26page%3D15%26items%3D15&scorePrecent=44. (accessed January 10, 2009).
Prensa Latina. 2008. Russia: Nanotechnology against world crisis. http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/clips/russia-nanotechnology-against-world-crisis-prensa-latina-12-7-08-3/. (accessed July 8, 2009).
Rel-UITA. 2007. Resolución sobre nanotecnología. Presented at 25 Congreso de la IUF Ginebra, March 19–22, 2007. http://www.rel-uita.org/sindicatos/congreso-uita-2007/resoluciones/resolucion-nano.htm. (accessed April 24, 2007).
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 2008. Novel Materials in the Environment: The case of nanotechnology. London: TSO (The Stationery Office). http://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/27-novel%20materials/documents/NovelMaterialsreport_rcep.pdf. (accessed July 31, 2010).
RS&RAE (The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering). 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm. (accessed March 1, 2009).
RSC (Ministerial notice requiring mandatory reporting of information relating to nanoscale materials). 2009. Nano-regulation creeps closer http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2009/February/25020901.asp. (accessed March 1, 2009).
Rusnano (Russian Corporation of Nanotechnology). 2008. Certification. http://www.rusnano.com/Post.aspx/Show/17980. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Salleh, A. 2005. Unions say nano-loopholes may hurt workers. ABC Science Online. http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?/science/news/stories/s1451929.htm 5 September. (accessed July 31, 2010).
SVTC (Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition). 2008. Regulation emerging technologies in Silicon Valley and beyond. http://www.etoxics.org/messages/SVTC_Nanotech_Report(April-2008).doc. (accessed April 24, 2008).
Swiss Re (Swiss Reinsurance Company). 2004. Nanotechnology: Small matter, many unknowns. http://media.swissre.com/documents/nanotechnology_small_matter_many_unknowns_en.pdf. (accessed July 31, 2010).
The Swiss Retailer’s Organisation & Innovation Society. 2008. Code of conduct.
Trade Union Congress (TUC). 2004. Nanotechnology.
Wolfe, Josh. 2005. Nanotech vs. the green gang. Forbes.com, April 6. http://www.forbes.com/2005/04/06/cz_jw_0406soapbox_inl_print.html. (accessed May 7, 2007).
WWICS (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars). 2006. A nanotechnology consumers product inventory. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. (accessed July 31, 2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foladori, G., Zayago Lau, E. (2010). The Role of Organized Workers in the Regulation of Nanotechnologies. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9614-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9615-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)