Abstract
In this chapter, the basic motivations for addressing the global deforestation issue – what the major issues and constraints involved will be; and how these might be dealt with – are laid out. The (possibly contentious) observation is made that while the emotion that loss of the large, charismatic natural forests of the developing world generates in many observers of the forest scene worldwide is potentially a driving force for change, it is also prone to misuse: concerned individuals can be led into extreme or unrealistically ideological positions. It is argued that, like it or not, some recognition of legitimate commercial use of forests, and of the importance of national sovereignty in how this is done are as necessary, in the solution of deforestation, as are concerns about loss of biodiversity, unacceptable treatment of local communities in forest areas, and other issues. It is further argued that the large questions as to how global forests can be saved and wisely used must be addressed directly, and in an integrated manner – something which has not happened to any great extent to date: how much forest can and should be sustained? Who should do this? Who will pay? Who should benefit most?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
As will be seen in Chapter 3, there are various technical arguments about what constitutes a forest, as opposed to more open woodland, and debates about where forest degradation ends, and actual deforestation begins, but in any event wherever this definitional line is drawn, the statement on decline still holds.
- 2.
There is some debate on the FAOFAO figures: The Science and Development website cites some satellite imaging covering the 1990–1997 period which result in figures for annual deforestation 23% lower than those provided by FAO.
- 3.
Medicinal plants, mushrooms, berries, other fruits, etc.
References
Humphreys, D. (2006) Forest Politics: The Evolution of International Cooperation. James and James-Earthscan
Humphreys D (1996) Forest politics. Earthscan, London
FAOFAO (2006). Global forest resource assessmentGlobal Forest Resource Assessment 2005 FAO Forestry Paper 147. Rome
Moelino M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) (2008) The decentralization of forest governance: Politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London
Sayer J, Maginnis S (eds) (2007) Forests in landscapes: Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. Earthscan, London
Sumner A, Tiwari M (2009) The millennium development goals and beyond: New directions in poverty reduction and development policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Palo M, Uusivuori J, Mery G (2001) World forests, markets and policies. Kluwer, The Netherlands
Vanclay JK, Prabhu R, Sinclair F (2006) Realising community futures: a practical guide to harnessing natural resources. Earthscan, Sterling, London, VA World Bank. (2004) Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy. The World Bank, Washington, DC
World Bank (2004) Sustaining Forests: A Devolopment Strategy. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douglas, J., Simula, M. (2011). Disappearing Rainforests: New Solutions. In: The Future of the World's Forests. World Forests, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9582-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9582-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9581-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9582-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)