Skip to main content

Internal Frames of Reference in FL Self-Concept Formation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards an Understanding of Language Learner Self-Concept

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 12))

  • 1375 Accesses

Abstract

Based on Marsh’s (1986a, American Educational Research Journal 23(1): 129–149) Internal and External Frame of Reference Model, this chapter concentrates on factors within the internal frame of reference used by learners in this study in forming their L2 self-concepts. It focuses in particular on the role of learners’ self-concepts in other domains and the resultant internal cross-domain comparisons between their self-concepts at various levels of specificity. It also considers learners’ belief systems about the nature of FLL, specific languages and attributions. Finally, the role of affect is examined and the potential influence of temporary affective states on learners’ reported self-concepts is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    She received a grade “B” in her first-year Italian course and a “C” in her first-year English course. As the courses are taught in different ways with differing content and examined without using comparable standardised procedures, it is difficult to compare the actual abilities implied by these grades. Nevertheless, as a form of external feedback for Joana, these could perhaps have been expected to have had more influence than they seemingly did on her respective self-concepts.

  2. 2.

    German is the mother tongue for all of the learners unless specifically stated otherwise.

  3. 3.

    Note: the term skill domain is understood in this study as an area of language and includes the “skill” areas of reading, writing, speaking, listening, vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation.

  4. 4.

    5 is equivalent to a fail in the Austrian grading system.

  5. 5.

    It is worth noting that the absence of this internal factor from the other data sets is likely to be the result of the single-point data generation method, which would not be conducive to eliciting this kind of temporal factor. As such, it indicates the value of generating data at multiple points in time, in order to avoid distortion from the potential influence of these temporary affective factors on the reported self-concept of the moment.

  6. 6.

    These results were calculated by comparing instances of the co-occurrence of codes for “causality” with the codes for the various internal/external factors emerging from this analysis.

References

  • Abraham, R.G., and R.J. Vann. 1987. Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In Learner strategies in language learning, eds. A. Wenden and J. Rubin, 85–102. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J., ed. 1999. Affect in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B., and W. Gardner. 1996. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterall, S. 1995. Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System 23(2): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterall, S. 1999. Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System 27(4): 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M.V. 1992. Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., and Z. Dörnyei. 2005a. Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behaviour. Language Learning 55(4): 613–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., and Z. Dörnyei. 2005b. The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89(1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L. 1995. Why we do what we do. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denissen, J.J.A., N.R. Zarrett, and J.S. Eccles. 2007. I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept and interest. Child Development 78(2): 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The L2 motivational system. In Motivation, language identity and the L2 self, eds. Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda, 9–42. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupreyrat, C., and C. Mariné. 2005. Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30(1): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S. 2003. Ability conceptions, motivation and development. Development and Motivation, BJEP Monograph Series II(2): 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S., C. Chiu, and Y. Hong. 1995. Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry 6(4): 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. 1991. Cognitive-experimental self-theory: Implications for developmental psychology. In Minnesota symposium on child development: Self-processes and development, vol. 23, eds. M. Gunnar and L.A. Sroufe, 111–137. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, T., A.C. Frenzel, N.C. Hall, and R. Pekrun. 2008. Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(1): 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. 1986. Cognitive-developmental processes in the integration of concepts about emotions and the self. Social Cognition 4(2): 119–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. 1998. The development of self-representations. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development, 5th edn, vol. 3, ed. N. Eisenberg, 553–617. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. 2006. The self. In Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, vol. 3, eds. W. Damon and R.M. Lerner, 505–570. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J.A. 1992. Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T. 1987. Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94(3): 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T. 1998. Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A., and G.M. Vaughan. 2002. Social psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E.K. 1988. The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal 72 (3): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E.K., and D.J. Young., eds. 1991. Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P.P., and D.L. Schallert. 2008. Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(4): 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.M., K.A. Daubman, and G.P. Nowicki. 1987. Positive effect facilitates creative problem-solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(6): 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.M., M.M.S. Johnson, E. Mertz, and G.F. Robinson. 1985. The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(6): 1413–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R.G. 1995. Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals 28(1): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. 1998. The emotional brain. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P.W. 1985. Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don’t put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. Social Cognition 3(1): 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P.W. 1987. Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(4): 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., and E. Wurf. 1987. The dynamic self-concept: A social-psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 38: 299–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. 1984. Relations among dimensions of self attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(6): 1291–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. 1986a. Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal 23(1): 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. 1986b. Self-serving effect (bias?) in academic attributions: Its relation to academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (3): 190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. 1990b. Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(4): 646–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. 1990c. Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(1): 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., L. Cairns, J. Relich, J. Barnes, and R.L. Debus. 1984. The relationship between dimensions of self-attribution and dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 76(1): 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and R. Craven. 1997. Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement and Adjustment, ed. G. Phye, 131–198. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., R. Craven, and R. Debus. 1999a. Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: a developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 45(4): 567–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and K-T. Hau. 2004. Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(1): 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., C-K. Kong, and K-T. Hau. 2001. Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and non-native languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(3): 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and R. Shavelson. 1985. Self-concept: its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist 20(3): 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and A.S. Yeung. 1998. Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of maths and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal 35(4): 705–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W., and A.S. Yeung. 2001. An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioural Research 36(3): 389–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, C., and C. Alvaro. 2000. The impact of motivation on temporal comparisons: Coping with traumatic events by perceiving personal growth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(3): 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D.B. 1989. Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics education. In Affect and mathematical problem solving, eds. D.B. McLeod and M.V. Adams, 245–258. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. 2007. Critical experiences in language learner development. In Contexts of english in use: Past and present, eds. M. Reitbauer, N. Campbell, S. Mercer and R. Vaupetitsch, 147–157. Wien: Braumüller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden, D.C., J.E. Plaks, and C.S. Dweck. 2006. “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(6): 738–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., and N. Husemann. 2006. Internal comparisons in everyday life. Journal of Educational Psychology 98(2): 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, J., L. Streblow, B. Pohlmann, and O. Köller. 2006. An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education 21(4): 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Y. 1999. Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning? Language Learning 49(3): 377–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K.R., L.D. Bendixen, and F.C. Haerle. 2006. Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemological research: Philosophical and empirical reflection in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review 18(1): 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J.B., and R.M. Plesko. 2001. Day-to-day relationships among self-concept clarity, self-esteem, daily events, and mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(2): 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., and M.D. Miller. 1994. Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 86(2): 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. 1990. Social support, achievement evaluations and self-concepts in adolescence. In The self-concept: European perspectives on its development, aspects and applications, ed. L. Oppenheimer, 107–119. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. 1992. The impact of emotions on learning achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review 41(4): 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., T. Goetz, W. Titz, and R.P. Perry. 2002. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37(2): 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., S. Maier, and M. Seligman. 1993. Learned Helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. 2005. Understanding motivation and emotion. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, D.H., J.R. Sparfeldt, O. Dickhäuser, and S.R. Schilling. 2005. Dimensional comparisons in subject-specific academic self-concepts and achievements: A quasi-experimental approach. Learning and Instruction 15(6): 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. 2006. Language learning motivation within the context of globalisation: An L2 self within an imagined global community. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: An International Journal 3(1): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H. 1991. Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26(3/4): 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. 1992. Changes in the valence of the self as a function of mood. Review of Personality and Social Psychology 14: 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. 1994. Incongruent effects of sad mood on self-conception valence: It’s a matter of time. European Journal of Social Psychology 24(1): 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showers, C.J., L.Y. Abramson, and M.E. Hogan. 1998. The dynamic self: How the content and structure of the self-concept change with mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(2): 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S.M., B.G. Licht, R.K. Wagner, and S.R. Stader. 1996. Organization of children’s academic ability-related self-perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(3): 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E.M., and R.J. Rankin. 1992. Math and verbal achievement and self-concepts: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Early Adolescence 12(3): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E.M., and R.J. Rankin. 1995. A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal 32(1): 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E.M., and S. Skaalvik. 2002. Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist 37(4): 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E.M., and H. Valas. 1999. Relations among achievement, self-concept and motivation in mathematics and language arts: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Education 67(2): 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B. 1997. The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychological Science 8(3): 117–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B., C. Chang-Schneider, and K.L. McClarity. 2007. Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist 62(2): 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B., J.J. Griffin, S.C. Predmore, and B. Gaines. 1987. The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(5): 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.E., E. Neter, and H.A. Wayment. 1995. Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(12): 1278–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vail, P. 1994. Emotion: The on/off switch for learning. Rosemont, NJ: Modern Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. 1985. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review 92(4): 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. 1986. An attribution theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. 1987. Metacognition: An expanded view on the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning 37(4): 573–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., and M. Karpathian. 1991. Who am I and what can I do? Children’s self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist 26(3&4): 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.E., and M. Ross. 2000. The frequency of temporal-self and social comparison in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(5): 928–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.E., and M. Ross. 2001. From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(4): 572–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D.J., ed. 1999. Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, and M. Martinez-Pons. 1992. Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal 29(3): 663–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S., and S. Ryan. 2010. A mindset for EFL: Learner’s beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Mercer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercer, S. (2011). Internal Frames of Reference in FL Self-Concept Formation. In: Towards an Understanding of Language Learner Self-Concept. Educational Linguistics, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9569-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics