Abstract
In medicine, as in general, a prerequisite for any thinking is possession of concepts; and correct thinking presupposes tenable concepts. So: Is the presence of M. tuberculosis a tenable conception of the cause of tuberculosis? Or is it, even, a cause of the disease? What is the essence of disease as a type of illness? Is Bayes’ theorem germane to the theory of diagnosis? What, exactly, is diagnosis, and what is prognosis? What is correct in correct diagnosis and good in good prognosis? Is there ‘gnosis’ other than dia- and prognosis? Etc. Today’s ‘authoritative’ dictionaries of medicine are not sources of the answers, tenable ones in particular. Nor is today’s medical education (Apps. 1–2.) Unsurprisingly, thus, even the basic essence of the knowledge-base of clinical medicine remains generally ill-understood, even by clinical academics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miettinen, O.S. (2010). The Knowledge-Base of Clinical Medicine: Its Essence. In: Up from Clinical Epidemiology & EBM. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9501-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9501-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9500-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9501-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)