Abstract
Having achieved rule-in diagnosis, an expert clinician’s next challenge may arise from the need to know about the causal origin – etiogenesis – of the patient’s illness, possible iatrogenesis in particular. Different from diagnosis, the doctor’s personal experience is not instructive about etiognostic probabilities; (s)he is totally depended on evidence from relevant research. But understanding the burden of that evidence from etiogenetic/etiognostic research is much more challenging than is its counterpart in respect to diagnostic research. In fact, it is so challenging that fundamental fallacies still characterize epidemiologists’ research on the etiogenesis of illness, even though etiogenesis has been the principal concern in their research for a good half-century already.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miettinen, O.S. (2010). Introduction into Etiognostic Clinical Research. In: Up from Clinical Epidemiology & EBM. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9501-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9501-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9500-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9501-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)