Skip to main content

Loss Estimation Module in the Second Generation Software QLARM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Casualties in Earthquakes

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 29))

Abstract

Currently, we are constructing our second-generation loss estimation tool QLARM (earthQuake Loss Assessment for Response and Mitigation) and upgrading the input database to be used in real-time and scenario mode. Our tool and database are open to all scientific users. The estimates include: (1) total number of fatalities and injured, (2) casualties by settlement, (3) percent of buildings in five damage grades, and (4) a map showing mean damage by settlement. The QLARM worldwide database of the elements-at-risk consists of city models constructed with the following parameters: (1) soil amplification factors, (2) distribution of building stock and population into vulnerability classes of the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98). We calculate damage and losses using vulnerability curves, regionally-based collapse models, and casualty matrices pertinent to EMS-98 vulnerability classes as a function of the seismic intensity. We calibrate our tool for different countries and regions worldwide considering macroseismic, damage, and loss data from past events. Thus, we calculate human losses for past earthquakes correctly to within a factor of 2, on average. Recently, we used QLARM to estimate expected human losses for the metropolitan area of Lima in case of a hypothetical earthquake of magnitude 8 in the immediate vicinity offshore of Lima.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen TI, Wald DJ (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for global seismic site conditions (VS30) and amplification around the globe. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (1985) Intensity-attenuation and magnitude-intensity relationships for Northwest European earthquakes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 13:773–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 25:371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seism Res Lett 68:128–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fäh D et al (2003) Earthquake catalogue of Switzerland (ECOS) and the related macroseismic database. Eclogae Geol Helv 96:219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi S (2005) The vulnerability assessment and the damage scenario in seismic risk analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998. Publication of the European Geodynamics and Seismology Centre no. 15, European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo J, Hu Y (1992) Study on attenuation laws of ground motion parameters. Earthquake Eng Eng Vibration 12:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • NIBS and FEMA (National Institute of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency), (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS®MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakhramanian MA, Larionov VI, Nigmetov GM, Sutschev SP (2000) Assessment of the seismic risk and forecasting consequences of earthquakes while solving problems on population rescue (theory and practice). Russian Civil Defense and Disaster Management Research Institute, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakhramanjyan MA, Nigmetov GM, Larionov VI, Nikolaev AV, Frolova NI, Sushchev SP, Ugarov AN (2001) Advanced procedures for risk assessment and management in Russia. Int J Risk Assess Manag 2(3/4):303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin NV (1968) Procedures of engineering seismological data application for seismic zoning. In: Seismic zoning of the USSR, Nauka, Moscow, pp 95–121 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanovski P, Dong W (1994) Simulation model for earthquake casualty estimation. In: Proceedings of Fifth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 00592, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Trendafiloski G, Wyss M, Rosset P, Marmureanu G (2009) Constructing city models to estimate losses due to earthquakes worldwide: application to Bucharest, Romania. Earthquake Spectra (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu T (2002) A list of deadly earthquakes in the world: 1500–2000. In: Lee WK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake engineering and seismology. Academic, Amsterdam, 81A:691–717. http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/utsu/index_eng.html

  • Wyss M (2005) Human losses expected in Himalayan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 34:305–314. doi: 10.1007/s11069-004-2073-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M (2006) The Kashmir M7.6 shock of 8 October 2005 calibrates estimates of losses in future Himalayan earthquakes. In: Van de Walle B, Turoff M (eds) Proceedings of the third international ISCRAM conference, Newark, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M, Trendafiloski G (2009) Trends in the casualty ratio of injured to fatalities in earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on disaster casualties, Cambridge, June 2009 (Chapter 18 of this publication)

  • Wyss M, Zibzibadze M (2009) Delay times of worldwide global earthquake alerts. Nat Hazards (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M, Rosset Ph, Trendafiloski G (2009) Teleseismic loss estimates in near-real-time after the M8 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008. In: Proceedings, international disaster and risk conference, Chengdu, 12–16 July 2009 (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M, Trendafiloski G, Rosset Ph, Wyss B (2009) Preliminary loss estimates for possible future earthquakes near Lima, Peru. WAPMERR Report, March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs RR, Chiou S-J, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This report was prepared with the support of the Japan Tobacco International Foundation, based in Switzerland, and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, but does not necessarily reflect the opinion of these parties.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Trendafiloski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trendafiloski, G., Wyss, M., Rosset, P. (2011). Loss Estimation Module in the Second Generation Software QLARM. In: Spence, R., So, E., Scawthorn, C. (eds) Human Casualties in Earthquakes. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9455-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics