Abstract
The worldwide ratio of injured to fatalities in earthquakes, R = Inj/Fat, has increased over time. This shows that it is more likely by approximately a factor of 2 that a person survives an earthquake today than 50 years ago. However, any meaningful analysis of R requires (as a minimum) separation by type of country and by location of epicentres (land or offshore). R in earthquakes beneath land is typically half of that for events offshore. R in the industrialised world is about two to three times larger than in the developing world. The countries that have made the greatest progress in protecting their population are Japan and China. Countries where R has not increased with time include Iran, Turkey, and Greece. The basic trends are clear, but the data sets for some individual countries are too small for the averages to be considered firm. We propose to use R to adjust the casualty matrices for estimation of human losses due to earthquakes worldwide.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berberian M (2005) The 2003 Bam urban earthquake: a predictable seismotectonic pattern along the western margin of the Rigid Lut Block, Southeast Iran. Earthquake Spectra 21:S1, S35–S99, December
Bilham R (2004) Urban earthquake fatalities: a safer world or worse to come? Seismol Res Lett 75(6):706–712
Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities, 12th Mallet Milne lecture. Bull Earthquake Eng 7(4):839–887
Noji EK (ed) (1997) Earthquakes. The public health consequences of disasters. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 135–178
Spence R (2007) Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960, 11th Mallet Milne Lecture. Bull Earthquake Eng 5:139–251
Trendafiloski G, Wyss M, Rosset Ph (2009) Loss estimation module in the second generation software QLARM. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on disaster casualties, Cambridge, June 2009 (Chapter 8 of this publication)
Utsu T (2002) A list of deadly earthquakes in the world: 1500–2000. In: Lee WK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International handbook of earthquake engineering and seismology. Academic, Amsterdam, 81A:691–717. http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/utsu/index_eng.html
Wyss M (2005) Human losses expected in Himalayan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 34:305–314. doi:10.1007/s11069-004-2073-1
Acknowledgments
This report was prepared with the support of the Japan Tobacco International Foundation, based in Switzerland, and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, but does not necessarily reflect the opinion of these parties.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wyss, M., Trendafiloski, G. (2011). Trends in the Casualty Ratio of Injured to Fatalities in Earthquakes. In: Spence, R., So, E., Scawthorn, C. (eds) Human Casualties in Earthquakes. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9455-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9455-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9454-4
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9455-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)