Skip to main content

Laplace Transformation and s-Domain Circuit Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Circuit Analysis and Design
  • 7260 Accesses

Abstract

In the present context, a transformation establishes a one-to-one relation between two sets of objects. Such a relation exists between sinusoidal functions of time and the corresponding phasor representations, provided a specification of the frequency of the sinusoid accompanies the phasor representation (to make the relation one-to-one).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The integral in (18.2) is an example of a line integral, so called because the path of integration is along a line defined by \(s = c\) that is not necessarily coincident with one of the axes. You need not be alarmed by this integral because we never need to use it.

  2. 2.

    In this book, signal means current or voltage.

  3. 3.

    You will see this proved if you take a course in complex variables.

  4. 4.

    In physical problems, we are free to choose a time origin. We could generalize by treating right-sided functions that equal zero for \(t < t_0\), but that would clutter the development without providing any useful increase in generality.

  5. 5.

    This requirement is somewhat stronger than necessary, but is easily tested and completely satisfactory in all practical applications.

  6. 6.

    Please accept on faith that the result is consistent with that of a rigorous development, such as provided by the theory of generalized functions (or distribution theory).

  7. 7.

    After Paul Dirac (1902–1984), a British physicist credited with introducing the delta function.

  8. 8.

    In general, the dimension of a delta function is the reciprocal of the dimension of the argument.

  9. 9.

    The left sides of the referenced relations can be defined in a self-consistent manner, but we do not need those more general relations in this book.

  10. 10.

    Entries 11–13 are useful mainly for obtaining inverse Laplace transforms.

  11. 11.

    Note that A is associated with p, which has a positive imaginary part and A * is associated with p *.

  12. 12.

    Recorded data or signals can be advanced relative to the time at which they were recorded, but that is not a true advance because it must be preceded by a delay (the recording time) sufficient to allow the advance.

  13. 13.

    After the British physicist Oliver Heaviside (1850–1925), who contributed much to electrical engineering.

  14. 14.

    The ideal differentiator described in Chapter 8 is rarely (if ever) used in practice.

  15. 15.

    In truth, frequency-domain analysis can be generalized through the Fourier transformation, and resulting properties and methods allow analysis of virtually any linear circuit and transformable excitation, not just sinusoids. You will learn about the Fourier transformation if you take a subsequent course in signal processing or communication systems, where it is favored over the Laplace transformation.

  16. 16.

    There are several definitions of stability. The one given here is called the BIBO (bounded-input-bounded output) definition and is an appropriate definition for linear circuit models. Note that no physical circuit can actually produce an unbounded output. Mathematical studies of stability necessarily deal with circuit models and thus with mathematical models of currents and voltages.

  17. 17.

    One can cook up excitations whose zeros cancel (mathematically) one or more poles of a transfer function, but in the real world, such cancellation is imperfect and all unforced terms are present, regardless of the form of the excitation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tildon H. Glisson Jr. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glisson, T.H. (2011). Laplace Transformation and s-Domain Circuit Analysis. In: Introduction to Circuit Analysis and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9443-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9443-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9442-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9443-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics