Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Chemical Risks: Beyond the Risk Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulating Chemical Risks

Abstract

The news media play a potentially crucial, yet often under-theorised, role in communicating chemical risks. Since research has tended to be restricted by traditional disciplinary boundaries, it has not always been able to benefit from insights gained from a broader perspective and has remained very fragmented. This chapter argues that recent approaches point to a more complex understanding of risk reporting and reflect wider social changes, both in the nature of ‘risk’ and the structure and workings of the media. It argues that any analysis of the media reporting of risk must be placed within the broader context of the growing concentration and globalisation of news media ownership and the increasingly ‘promotional culture’ which we inhabit, highlighted by the rapid rise of the public relations industry in recent years and claims-makers that employ increasingly sophisticated media strategies. This is illustrated by considering examples such as the furor over the proposed dumping of the Brent Spar oil installation at sea in 1995 and the Prestige oil disaster of 2002. Key issues are highlighted concerning news values, the credibility of news sources and access to the news media, and the current organisation of news work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agraso, M.F., Eirexas, F. and Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2003) The Prestige in the Galician press in 2002: a preliminary analysis. Quark, Ciencia, Medicina, Communicacion y Cultura 28: 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMPERA (2007) Risk communication in accidental marine pollution: good practice guide for an effective communication strategy. http://otvm.uvigo.es/investigacion/informes/documentos/AMPERA_Publication_Nr2_RiskCommunication.pdf. Cited September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (1993) The production of environmental news: A study of source-media relations. Unpublished PhD, University of Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (1997) Media, Culture and the Environment. UCL, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2002) The media politics of oil spills. Spill Science and Technology Bulletin 7(5): 7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2003) Environmental activism and news sources. In: Cottle, S. (ed.) News, Public Relations and Power. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2006) Media and risk. In: Walklate, S. and Mythen, G. (eds.) Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. Open University/McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, pp 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. and Marhadour, A. (2007) Slick PR? The media politics of the Prestige oil spill. Science Communication 29(1): 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Petersen, A. and David, M. (2005a) Communication or spin? Source -media relations in science journalism. In: Allan, S. (ed.) Journalism: Critical Issues. Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Petersen, A, Wilkinson, C. and Allan, S. (2005b) The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Science Communication 27(2): 200–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Petersen, A., Wilkinson, C. and Allan, S. (2009) Nanotechnology, Risk and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, V. (2006) Policy agenda-setting and risk communication: Greenpeace, Shell and issues of trust. Press/Politics 11(3): 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennie, L. (1998) Brent Spar, Atlantic oil and Greenpeace. Hansard Society Series in Politics and Government 7: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T.A. and Lawrence, R.G. (2002) The social and political meaning of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Spill Science and Technology Bulletin 7(5): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, M.J. (2003) The Prestige disaster: one year on. Greenpeace Spain Report, November. http://www.greenpeace.org/multimedia/download/1/346545/0/Prestige_report.pdf/

  • Chemical Reaction (2007a) Navigating REACH: an activist’s guide to using and improving the new EU chemicals legislation, November. http://www.chemicalreaction.org/

  • Chemical Reaction (2007b) My voice – how you can demand better protection of human health and the environment from hazardous chemicals, May. http://www.chemicalreaction.org/

  • Cottle, S. (1998) Ulrich Beck, ‘risk society’ and the media: a catastrophic view? European Journal of Communication 13(1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. (2000) Making the environment news on the Today programme. In: Smith, J. (ed.) The Daily Globe: Environmental Change, the Public and the Media. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (2000) Public relations, news productions and changing patterns of source access in the British national media. Media, Culture and Society 22(1): 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, W. (2005) The power and limits of media-based international oppositional politics – a case study: the Brent Spar conflict’. In: de Jong, W., Shaw, M. and Stammers, N. (eds.) Global Activism, Global Media. Pluto, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwoody, S. (1999) Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In: Friedman, S., Dunwoody, S. and Rogers, C.L. (eds.) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R.M. (1993) Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R.V., Baranek, P.M. and Chan, J.B.L. (1989) Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, J., Fernández, L. and Muiño, R. (2006) Role of the Spanish scientific community in the initial assessment and management of the environmental damages caused by the Prestige oil spill. Marine Policy 30(4): 308–314. http://otvm.uvigo.es/investigacion/informes/documentos/archivos/marine_policy_freire.pdf

  • Goddard, L. (1996) Shell chief knocks media over simplistic coverage. PR Week, 24th May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorss, J. and Lewenstein, B. (2005) The salience of small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986–2004. Paper presented at International Communication Association Conference, 27 May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M.R., Sachsman, D.B., Sandman, P.M. and Salome, K.L. (1989) Network evening news coverage of environmental risk. Risk Analysis 9(1): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan, J.A. (2006) Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2000) Claims-making and framing in British newspaper coverage of the ‘Brent Spar’ controversy. In: Allan, S., Adam, B. and Carter, C. (eds.) Environmental Risks and the Media. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, I., Lewis, J. and Speers, T. (2003) Towards a better map: science, the public and media. Report prepared for the ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, S. (1990) The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science 20: 519–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornig Priest, S. (2001) Cloning: a study in news production. Public Understanding of Science 10: 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G. (2001) Shell, Greenpeace and Brent Spar. Palgrave, Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1999) Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk and Society 1(1): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, B.V. (1995a) Science and media. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds.) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, B.V. (1995b) From fax to facts: communication in the cold fusion saga. Social Studies of Science 25: 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J. and MacClean, D. (1991) The role of the media in risk communication. In: Kasperson, R. and Stallen, P. (eds.) Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Kluwer Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R.E. and Renn, O. (1997) The Brent Spar controversy: an example of risk communication gone wrong. Risk Analysis 17(2): 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, R.A. (1991) Popularization versus secularization: media coverage of health. In: Wilkins, L. and Patterson, P. (eds.) Risky Business: Communicating Issues of Science, Risk and Public Policy. Greenwood, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. (2001) News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1998) Global environmental change in the news: 1987–90 vs. 1992–6. International Sociology 13(4): 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and Dinan, B. (2000) The rise of the PR Industry in Britain: 1979–98. European Journal of Communication 15(1): 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. and Riechert, B.P. (2000) Interest group strategies and journalistic norms: news media framing of environmental issues. In: Allan, S., Adam, B. and Carter, C. (eds.) Environmental Risks and the Media. Routledge, London, pp 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H. and Lester, M. (1975) Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology 81: 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G., Petts J. and Horlick-Jones, T. (2003) After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication. In: Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R.E. and Slovic, P. (eds.) The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 156–178.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mythen, G. (2004) Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mythen, G. (2007). Reappraising the risk society thesis: telescopic sight or myopic vision? Current Sociology 55(6): 793–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. WH Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M. and M. Huge (2007) Where do science debates come from? Understanding attention cycles and framing. In: Brossard, D., Shanahan, J. and Nesbitt, T.C. (eds.) The Public, the Media and Agricultural Biotechnology. CABI, Oxford, pp 193–230.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M.C. and Lewenstein, B.V. (2002) Biotechnology and the American media: the policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication 23(4): 359–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M., Brossard, D. and Kroepsch, A. (2003) Framing science: the stem cell controversy in the age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(2): 36–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (1996) Greenpeace mind-bombing the media. Wired 2(5): 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. (1999) The portrayal of research into genetic-based differences of sex and sexual orientation: a study of ‘popular’ science journals, 1980 to 1997. Journal of Communication Inquiry 23(2): 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A., Anderson, A., Allan, S. and Wilkinson, C. (2009) Opening the black box: scientists’ views on the role of the mass media in the nanotechnology debate. Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 512–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, T., Löfstedt, R.E. and Dietrich, D. (2006) Science and politics: from science to decision making. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 44(1): 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T. and Murdock, G. (2001) The social amplification of risk: the media and the public. Contract Research Report 329/2001. HSE Books, Sudbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. and Kastenholz, H. (2000) Risk communication: chemical products risks. OECD background paper. http://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/238/background_paper.pdf

  • Rose, C. (1998) The Turning of the ‘Spar’. Greenpeace, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (1991) Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organising. South End Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanne, M. and Meier, W. (1992) Media coverage of risk. In: Durant, J. (ed.) Museums and the Public Understanding of Science. Science Museum Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheeres, J. (2002) Oil’s not well in Spain. Wired, 17th December. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,56877,00.html

  • Selin, H. (2007) Coalition politics and chemicals management in a regulatory ambitious Europe. Global Environmental Politics 7(3): 63–93. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/global_environmental_politics/v007/7.3selin.pdf

  • Singer, E. and Endreny, P. (1987) Reporting hazards: their benefits and their costs. Journal of Communication 37(3): 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilas Paz, A. (2004) Prestige: Never again. http://www.archipelago.gr/defaulten.asp

  • Wheelwright, J. (1994) Degrees of Disaster, Prince William Sound: How Nature Reels and Rebounds. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R. (2004) See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. Demos, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (1992) The Culture of Nature: North American Landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (2002) The Prestige catastrophe: oil spill off Spain’s NW coast. http://www.panda.org/news_facts/newsroom/crisis/spain_oil_spill/index.cfm

  • World Wildlife Fund Spain (2003) Prestige oil spill WWF Spain activities: progress report. http://www.wwf.dk/db/files/prestige_ en_oliekatastrofe_i_gali.pdf. Cited May 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Applied Psychosocial Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK

    Alison Anderson

Authors
  1. Alison Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Political Science, Södertörn University, Alfred Nobels allé 7, Flemingsberg, 14189, Sweden

    Johan Eriksson

  2. , Department of Political Science, Södertörn University, Alfred Nobels allé 7, Flemingsberg, 14189, Sweden

    Michael Gilek

  3. , Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78B, Stockholm, 10044, Sweden

    Christina Rudén

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, A. (2010). Communicating Chemical Risks: Beyond the Risk Society. In: Eriksson, J., Gilek, M., Rudén, C. (eds) Regulating Chemical Risks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation