Abstract
It is a commonplace to regard eighteenth century as the triumph of the Newtonian scientific program. However, in the past few years, historians of science have increasingly acknowledged that eighteenth-century science cannot be resumed as the age of Newtonianism. In the case of experimental physics, assuming that Newton’s world views prevailed throughout the eighteenth century is a naïve historiographic interpretation. At this period, different areas of science were not clearly defined and well developed in the same extension. One cannot deny the influence of Newtonian studies on optics and word view on celestial mechanics studies all over the Europe, however, in order to develop a broader apprehension of modern science development it is necessary to look upon other realms and avoid focusing too intently upon Newtonian celestial mechanics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There is a controversy over the years of publication of these volumes. Heilbron, following the Catalogue Général des Livres Imprimés de la Bibliothèque Nationale, states that the six volumes were published between 1743 and 1748 (Heilbron, 1981). Whilst the leading biographer of Nollet, Jean Torlais, says that the first two volumes were published in 1743, the next two in 1748, the fifth in 1755 and the last in 1764 (Torlais, 1954, p. 257). In his doctoral thesis, Ramez Maluf Bahige consulted original reviews on the Leçons and Académie approvals of the volumes published in 1755 and 1764 (Maluf, 1985, p. 175). As I have not had the opportunity to consult the original first editions of the volumes, I cannot take sides on this issue.
References
Brunet, P. (1931). L’introduction des theories de Newton en France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Blanchard.
Cohen, I. B. (1966). Franklin and Newton. Cambridge, MA: The American Philosophical Society.
Frängsmyr, T., Heilbron, J. L., Rider, R. E., (eds.) (1990). The quantifying spirit in the eighteenth century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gascoigne, J. (2003). Ideas of nature: natural philosophy. In: Porter, R., (ed.), The Cambridge history of science – volume 4 – eighteenth century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 285–304.
Hankins, T. (1985). Science and the enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heilbron, J. (1981). Jean-Antoine. In: Gillispie, C. C., (ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography, Vol. 9. New York, NY: Charles Scribner s Sons, pp. 145–148.
Heilbron, J. L. (1999). Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries. A study in early modern physics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Home, R. W. (1981). The effluvial theories of electricity. New York, NY: Arno Press.
Home, R. W. (2003). Mechanics and experimental physics. In: Porter, R., (ed.), The Cambridge history of science – volume 4 – eighteenth century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 354–374.
Iliffe, R. (2003). Philosophy of Science. In: Porter, R., (ed.), The cambridge history of science – volume 4 – eighteenth century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 268–284.
Maluf, R. B. (1985). Jean Antoine Nollet and experimental natural philosophy in 18th-century France. In: Dissertation Abstracts International, 46: 3846–A.
Nollet, J. A. (1738). Programme ou idée génerale d’un cours de physique expérimentale, avec un catalogue raisonné des instruments qui servent aux expériences. Paris: Chez P. G. Le Mercier.
Nollet, J. A. (1745). Conjectures sur les causes de l’électricité des corps. Histoire de l’Académie, Mémoires, 107–151.
Nollet, J. A. (1753). Essai sur l’électricité des corps. Paris: Chez les freres Guerin.
Porter, R. (2003). The cambridge history of science. volume 4. eighteenth-century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Priestley, J. (1966). The history and present state of electricity with a new introduction by Robert E. Schofield, Vol. 1. New York, NY; London: Johnson reprint corporation.
Rousseau, G. S., Porter, R. (1980). The ferment of knowledge. Studies in the historiography of eighteenth-century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shapin, S. (2003). The image of the men of science. In: Porter, R., (ed.), The cambridge history of science – volume 4 – eighteenth century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–183.
Stewart, L. (1986). Public lectures and private patronage in Newtonian England. Isis, 77(1): 47–58.
Torlais, J. (1954). L’Abbé Nollet (1700–1770). Un physician au siècle des lumières. Paris: Sipuco.
Turner, G. L. E. (2003). Eighteenth-century scientific instruments and their makers. In: Porter, R., (ed.), The Cambridge history of science – volume 4 – eighteenth century science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 511–535.
Wolf, A. (1939). A history of science, technology, and philosophy in the eighteenth century. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to a Dibner Library Research Grant I could access Nollet’s originals at Dibner Library of History of Science and Technology in Washington-DC, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silva, C.C. (2011). Jean Antoine Nollet’s Contributions to the Institutionalization of Physics During the 18th Century. In: Krause, D., Videira, A. (eds) Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 290. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9421-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9422-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)