Abstract
This paper starts by presenting an overview of an approach to the theory of science based on units of scientific knowledge, named “advances”, connected by probabilistic causal relations. The notion of the “causal strength” of an advance is then introduced, and examples from nineteenth-century spectroscopy are explored with diagrams. The aim of this project is the implementation of the causal network in computer language.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“The resolution of these problems was greatly facilitated when Robert Bunsen, in the mid-1850s, introduced a lamp which provided a hot flame of low intrinsic luminosity; with the ‘Bunsen burner’ flame spectra could be observed against a minimum of disturbing background, and spectrum analysis was thereby facilitated in general. In particular, William Swan, using the Bunsen burner, was able to show convincingly in 1856 that the bright D lines could be attributed to sodium, the ubiquity of the D lines being due to general contamination with small amounts of that element. It was against this background that Bunsen and Kirchhoff undertook their collaborative researches of 1859–1860” (Siegel, 1976, pp. 568–9).
- 2.
The term “causal power” could be used, but it seems to be committed to a realist conception of causes, which I would like to avoid in the present exploratory stage of the project.
References
Donovan, A., Laudan, L., Laudan, R., (eds.) (1988). Scrutinizing science: empirical studies of scientific change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Millican, P., (ed.), online, 1777 edition.
Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2: 245–264.
McGucken, W. (1969). Nineteenth-century spectroscopy: development of the understanding of spectra 1802–1897. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Pessoa, O., Jr. (2001). Counterfactual histories: the beginning of quantum physics. Philosophy of Science, 68 ( Proceedings): S519–S530.
Pessoa, O., Jr. (2005). “Causal models in the history of science”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 5(14): 263–274.
Pessoa, O., Jr. (2006). Computation of probabilities in causal models of history of science. Principia (Florianópolis), 10(2): 109–124.
Pessoa, O., Jr. (2009a). Scientific progress as expressed by tree diagrams of possible histories. In: Mortari, C. A. & Dutra, L. H. A., (eds.), Anais do V Simpósio Internacional Principia (Coleção Rumos da Epistemologia, vol. 9). Florianópolis: Núcleo de Epistemologia e Lógica, UFSC, pp. 114–122.
Pessoa, O., Jr. (2009b). Independent discoveries following different paths: the case of the law of spectral reversion (1848–1859). In: Crispino, L. C. B., (ed.), Trends in physics: festschrift in homage to Prof. José Maria Filardo Bassalo. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, pp. 269–292.
Radick, G., Henry, J., Bowler, P. J., French, S., Fuller, S. (2008). Focus: counterfactuals and the historian of science. Isis, 99: 547–584.
Siegel, D. M. (1976). Balfour Stewart and Gustav Robert Kirchhoff: two independent approaches to “Kirchhoff’s Radiation Law”. Isis, 67(4): 565–600.
Woolf, H. (1964). The beginnings of astronomical spectroscopy. In: Cohen, I. B., Taton, R., (eds.), L’Aventure de la Science (Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, vol. 1). Paris: Hermann, pp. 619–634.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pessoa, O. (2011). The Causal Strength of Scientific Advances. In: Krause, D., Videira, A. (eds) Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 290. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9421-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9422-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)