Skip to main content

The Causal Strength of Scientific Advances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 290))

Abstract

This paper starts by presenting an overview of an approach to the theory of science based on units of scientific knowledge, named “advances”, connected by probabilistic causal relations. The notion of the “causal strength” of an advance is then introduced, and examples from nineteenth-century spectroscopy are explored with diagrams. The aim of this project is the implementation of the causal network in computer language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “The resolution of these problems was greatly facilitated when Robert Bunsen, in the mid-1850s, introduced a lamp which provided a hot flame of low intrinsic luminosity; with the ‘Bunsen burner’ flame spectra could be observed against a minimum of disturbing background, and spectrum analysis was thereby facilitated in general. In particular, William Swan, using the Bunsen burner, was able to show convincingly in 1856 that the bright D lines could be attributed to sodium, the ubiquity of the D lines being due to general contamination with small amounts of that element. It was against this background that Bunsen and Kirchhoff undertook their collaborative researches of 1859–1860” (Siegel, 1976, pp. 568–9).

  2. 2.

    The term “causal power” could be used, but it seems to be committed to a realist conception of causes, which I would like to avoid in the present exploratory stage of the project.

References

  • Donovan, A., Laudan, L., Laudan, R., (eds.) (1988). Scrutinizing science: empirical studies of scientific change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Millican, P., (ed.), online, 1777 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2: 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGucken, W. (1969). Nineteenth-century spectroscopy: development of the understanding of spectra 1802–1897. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, O., Jr. (2001). Counterfactual histories: the beginning of quantum physics. Philosophy of Science, 68 ( Proceedings): S519–S530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, O., Jr. (2005). “Causal models in the history of science”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 5(14): 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, O., Jr. (2006). Computation of probabilities in causal models of history of science. Principia (Florianópolis), 10(2): 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, O., Jr. (2009a). Scientific progress as expressed by tree diagrams of possible histories. In: Mortari, C. A. & Dutra, L. H. A., (eds.), Anais do V Simpósio Internacional Principia (Coleção Rumos da Epistemologia, vol. 9). Florianópolis: Núcleo de Epistemologia e Lógica, UFSC, pp. 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, O., Jr. (2009b). Independent discoveries following different paths: the case of the law of spectral reversion (1848–1859). In: Crispino, L. C. B., (ed.), Trends in physics: festschrift in homage to Prof. José Maria Filardo Bassalo. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, pp. 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radick, G., Henry, J., Bowler, P. J., French, S., Fuller, S. (2008). Focus: counterfactuals and the historian of science. Isis, 99: 547–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. M. (1976). Balfour Stewart and Gustav Robert Kirchhoff: two independent approaches to “Kirchhoff’s Radiation Law”. Isis, 67(4): 565–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, H. (1964). The beginnings of astronomical spectroscopy. In: Cohen, I. B., Taton, R., (eds.), L’Aventure de la Science (Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, vol. 1). Paris: Hermann, pp. 619–634.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osvaldo Pessoa Jr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pessoa, O. (2011). The Causal Strength of Scientific Advances. In: Krause, D., Videira, A. (eds) Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 290. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics