Skip to main content

Freudian Psychoanalysis as a Model for Overcoming the Duality Between Natural and Human Sciences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 290))

Abstract

The methodological (and, ultimately, ontological) dualism that opposes natural and human (or social) sciences was born out of the German neo-Kantian environment of the late nineteenth century and organized a great deal of the epistemological reflection during the twentieth century. For as long as the logical positivist philosophy of science has prevailed, this dualism has often taken the form of a division between those sciences which had and those which did not have a concrete possibility of fitting into the epistemic model of the received view of science. The philosophical critique of this model, however, was not immediately followed by a systematic challenge of the division of the field of scientific knowledge between natural sciences and the humanities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assoun, P. -L. (1983). Introdução à epistemologia freudiana. Rio de Janeiro: Imago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of contemporary human sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. American Sociologist, 13: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1960). The idea of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1895/1950). Project for a scientific psychology, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 1. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 283–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913). The claims of psychoanalysis to scientific interest, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 13. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 165–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 14. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 67–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 14. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 159–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 18. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 18. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 67–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and monotheism: three essays, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 23. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 3–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1940). Some elementary lessons of psychoanalysis, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 23. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp. 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keat, R. (1981). The politics of social science: freud, habermas and the critique of positivism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). La Nature, Notes, Cours du Collège de France. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J., et al. (eds.) (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Theisen Simanke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simanke, R.T. (2011). Freudian Psychoanalysis as a Model for Overcoming the Duality Between Natural and Human Sciences. In: Krause, D., Videira, A. (eds) Brazilian Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 290. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9422-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics