Abstract
The recent years, phase classification has frequently been discussed as a method to guide scheduling, compiler optimizations and program simulations. In this chapter, I introduce a new classification method called Setvectors. I show that the new method outperforms classification accuracy of state-of-the-art methods by approximately 6–25%, while it has about the same computational complexity as the fastest known methods. Additionally, I introduce a new method called PoEC (Percentage of Equal Clustering) to objectively compare phase classification techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
K. Beyls, E.H. D’Hollander, Reuse distance as a metric for cache behavior, in Proceedings of the IASTED Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, 2001
A.S. Dhodapkar, J.E. Smith, Managing multi-configuration hardware via dynamic working set analysis, in International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA’02), 2002
E. Duesterwald, C. Cascaval, S. Dwarkadas, Characterizing and predicting program behavior and its variability, in 12th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT’03), 2003
C. Fang, S. Carr, S. Önder, Z. Wang, Reuse-distance-based miss-rate prediction on a per instruction basis, in Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on Memory System Performance, 2004
T. Huffmire, T. Sherwood, Wavelet-based phase classification, in Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT’06), 2006
C. Jacobs, A. Finkelstein, D. Salesin, Fast multiresolution image querying, in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1995
J. Lau, J. Sampson, E. Perelman, G. Hamerly, B. Calder, The strong correlation between code signatures and performance. International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2005
J. Lau, S. Schoenmackers, B. Calder, Structures for phase classification. International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, 2004
C.-K. Luk, R. Cohn, R. Muth, H. Patil, A. Klausner, G. Lowney, S. Wallace, V.J. Reddi, K. Hazelwood, Pin: building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation. Programming Language Design and Implementation, 2005
J. MacQueen, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate obervations, in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 281–297, 1967
Settle, A., Kihm, J.L., Janiszewski, A., and Connors, D. A. (2004). Architectural Support for Enhanced SMT Job Scheduling, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques
T. Sherwood, E. Perelman, G. Hamerly, B. Calder, Automatically characterizing large scale program behavior, in ASPLOS-X: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2002
E. Stollnitz, T. DeRose, D. Salesin, Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1995
M. Zwick, M. Durkovic, F. Obermeier, W. Bamberger, K. Diepold, MCCCSim – a highly configurable multi core cache contention simulator. Technical Report – Technische Universität München, https://mediatum2.ub.tum.de/doc/802638/802638.pdf, 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zwick, M. (2010). Predicting Memory Phases. In: Ao, SI., Rieger, B., Amouzegar, M. (eds) Machine Learning and Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 68. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9419-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9419-3_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9418-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9419-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)