Skip to main content

Rationality: A Problem?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Shame of Reason in Organizational Change

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 32))

  • 484 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 1 suggested that organizational change – or its failure – might be illuminated by Levinas’s thoughts on the problematic nature of rationality and on radical resistance against encapsulation. In order to justify that illumination it should be clear that in both areas, that is in organizations studies and in philosophy, scholars treat those topics in a comparable way. Chapter 2 examines that question. This is done however only with regard to the issue of problematic rationality and – at this stage – not with regard to the topic of the radical resistance. The reason is that management authors do not explicitly discuss the topic of the radical resistance. The Chapter therefore intends to determine, for each of both mentioned areas, whether rationality is experienced there as a problem indeed and, if so, whether the problematic aspects of both areas have similarities. The conclusions with regard to both questions are in the affirmative: both in organization studies and in philosophy people talk about problematic aspects of rationality. These manifest themselves at the cognitive level as deception and at the social level as exclusion. Furthermore a congruence appears between the two areas as to the way these issues are discussed, namely through the crucial role both disciplines attribute to the mechanism of representation. And through the finding that within both disciplines people seek for concepts of science which are freed from representationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I understand thing-ontology , based on the writings of De Boer (1976 and 1989), as follows. Thing-ontology assumes that material and immaterial things have a definable identity. In this point of departure reification (i.e. the attributing of a thing-like character to what exists) is linked to the postulate of a reality outside us which can be known by us. That connection is triggered by the finding that things are not always empirically distinct, so that for defining of the assumed identities recourse has to be taken to a knowable order which exists independently of us (and therefore is reliable) in which those identities are established.

References

  • Blaug, R. 1999. The tyranny of the visible: Problems in the evaluation of anti-institutional radicalism. Organization 6 (1): 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, Th. 1976. Tussen filosofie en profetie. Baarn: Ambo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., and R. Waterman. 1982. Search of excellence; Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. 2003. Theory and practice in the real world. In The Oxford handbook of organization theory, eds. H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen, 453–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1969. De sociologische methode. Rotterdam: Universitaire Pers Rotterdam. Originally: (1895) Les règles de la méthode sociologique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. 2000. Rationality, practical. In Concise Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, 742–743. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nispen, J. van. 1996. Edmund Husserl. In Kritisch denkerslexicon. Breda: Veen Magazines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bos, R. 2002. Leuteraars of niet? In Het Financieele Dagblad, 20. 31 Aug 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. 1996. Manufacturing the employee. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. 2001. Organizations and humiliation: Looking beyond Elias. Organization 8 (3): 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., and H. Willmott. 1989. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology 23 (4): 535–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 1992. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review 17 (3): 432–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E. 1996. Technical and aesthetic fashion. In Translating organizational change, eds. B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrow, M. 1997. Do organizations have feelings? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baets, W. 2004. Wie orde zaait zal chaos oogsten. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, J., and A. Werr. 2000. The invincible character of management consulting rhetoric: How one blends incommensurates while keeping them apart. Organization 7 (4): 633–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bos, R., and H. Willmott. 2001. Towards a post-dualistic business ethics: Interweaving reason and emotion in working life. Journal of Management Studies 38 (6): 769–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. 1996. Emotion and organization. In Handbook of Organization Studies, eds. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetlesen, A. 1994. Perception, empathy and judgment. An inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park (PE.): Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers, not MBA’s. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J. 1984. The validity and usefulness of theories in an emerging organizational science. Academy of Management Review 1984 (9): 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstead, S. 2002. Organization as reply: Henri Bergson and casual organization theory. Organization 9 (1): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. 1993. Strength is ignorance; Slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies 30 (4): 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, T., and T. Bakken. 2003. Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann´s autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies 24 (9): 1511–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. 1996. Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, Th. 1989. Van Brentano tot Levinas; Studies over de fenomenologie. Meppel: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., and F. Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caluwé, L. de, and H. Vermaak. 2004. Thinking about change in different colours. In Dynamics of organizational change and learning, ed. J. Boonstra. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. 1992. Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Ark Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuten, J., and A. Rip. 2000. Narrative infrastructure in product creation processes. Organization 7 (1): 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen, Ø. 1998. The end of organization theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., and Th. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W. 1978. The greek philosophers; From Thales to Aristotle. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1990. Cosmopolis; The hidden agenda of modernity. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., and B. Gustavsen. 1996. Beyond theory; Changing organizations through participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., and J. Lannamann. 2002. The situation of social constructionism; Its ‘imprisonment’ within the ritual of theory-criticism-and-debate. Theory and Psychology 12 (5): 577–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 2003a. As if business ethics were possible, ‘within such limits’…. Organization 10 (2): 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 2003b. Theory after the postmodern condition. Organization 10 (3): 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. 1999. Human and inhuman resource management: Sense and nonsense. Organization 6 (2): 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. 1999. Minding the workers: The meaning of ‘Human’ and ‘Human Relations’ in Elton Mayo. Organization 6 (2): 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, M., and C. Steyaert. 1999. The inhuman space of HRM: Sensing the subject. Organization 6 (2): 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. 1988. Thriving on chaos; Handbook for a management revolution. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., and Th. Adorno. 1987. Dialectiek van de Verlichting. Nijmegen: SUN. Originally: (1947) Dialektik der Aufklärung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Th. 2003. Schopenhauer en Nietzsche. Soesterberg: Aspect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1995. Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1981. Organizations; Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdy, A. 2003. Knowing the unknowable? A discussion of methodological and theoretical issues in emotion research and organizational studies. Organization 10 (1): 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., and W. Torbert. 2001. The action turn. Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformations 6 (1): 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bos, R. 2004a. Arbeid: Spasme of geste. In Arbeid, tijd en flexibiliteit, eds. A. Witteveen, T. Korver, and H. Achterhuis. Schiedam: Scriptum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., and J. Hassard. 1999. Organization unbound: Actor-network theory, research strategy and institutional flexibility. Organization 6 (3): 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D.M. 2004. Change works: A critical construction. In Dynamics of organizational change and learning, ed. J. Boonstra. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, R., and H. Willmott. 1999. The organization of thought. Organization 6 (3): 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bos, R. 2000. Fashion and Utopia in management thinking. Tilburg: Proefschrift Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bos, R. 1997. Business ethics and Bauman ethics. Organization Studies 18 (6): 997–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 2001. Terug naar de rede. Kampen: Agora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, M.-J. de. 1997. Grootmeesters van de sociologie. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. 2003. Continentale filosofie. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 2002. Levinas and judaism. In The Cambridge companion to Levinas, eds. S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naud Van der Ven .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van der Ven, N. (2011). Rationality: A Problem?. In: The Shame of Reason in Organizational Change. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9373-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics