Skip to main content

Trial by Ordeal: CSI and the Rule of Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Law, Culture and Visual Studies
  • 2088 Accesses

Abstract

The popular American television dramatic series, Crime Scene Investigation (CSI), with its emphasis on forensic analysis, has become an icon for anxieties within the legal system about truth-finding and legal outcomes. This chapter reviews empirical research on the “CSI effect” and then explores cultural dimensions of the show as suggested by analysis of its paradigms and style rather than the narrative content of specific episodes. CSI is related to larger trends within American legal culture and raises questions about the future of the rule of law.

Photo: Gunshot Residue Lab, Connecticut State Forensic Science Laboratory, 2006. Christina Spiesel, All rights reserved.

The author wishes to thank Pamela Hobbs, Elaine Pagliaro, Ann Kibbey, Neal Feigenson, and Sydney Spiesel for their contributions to her thinking. The opinions expressed are her own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    American television shows are broadcast around the world, but this discussion is confined particularly to the United States.

  2. 2.

    Nielson ratings: The 2007 statistics are drawn from a report: http://www.sfgate.com/tvradio/nielsens/. Accessed April 9, 2007. 2010 statistics are from http://en-us.nielsen.com/rankings/insights/rankings/television. Last accessed January 30, 2010.

  3. 3.

    In a more recent article, Judge Shelton reports on empirical studies on this notion of a “tech effect.” He concludes that there is an expectation of increased science in evidence, but the CSI itself is only a small part of the media stream that molds expectations. He does envision a problem of raised expectations for all parts of the criminal justice system, from changed legal strategies in argument to pressures on an inadequately funded justice system (Shelton 2010). For very recent coverage on the reality of medical examiner’s work in contrast to television drama, see A.C. Thompson et al. (2011).

  4. 4.

    It is perhaps our own naiveté to imagine that people who serve in the justice system are not immune to the same media influences that the rest of us are. It should be no shock to us that Justice Scalia can say, seemingly without irony, that Jack Bauer, a character in Fox’s dramatic series 24, “saved Los Angeles.” Quoted by Peter Lattman (2007), “Justice Scalia hearts Jack Bauer.” Wall Street Journal Law Blogs. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/06/20/justice-scalia-hearts-jack-bauer/tab/article/. Last accessed August 8, 2010.

  5. 5.

    This is perhaps indirectly substantiated in a recent article by Tamara F. Lawson (2009, 119). She examines specific cases and lays out her argument for a “CSI infection” in the ways the cases were handled. The term infection carries the emotional force of disease, corruption, and perhaps even epidemic in the criminal justice system from something outside, a viral presence, perhaps.

  6. 6.

    From an interview with Elaine Pagliaro in March 2006. She is the former Acting Director of the Connecticut Forensics Science Laboratory. Notes on file with the author.

  7. 7.

    For an analysis of specific crimes and their frequency in CSI, see Deutsch and Cavender (2008).

  8. 8.

    See Wikipedia for technological history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoshop; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_camera#Digital_Cameras; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaroid_camera; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy_Story; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRI; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genome_Project http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_profiling. This report details the history of surveillance technology in the United States: http://www.library.ca.gov/CRB/97/05/crb97-005.html#overview

  9. 9.

    Gil Grissom, explaining to his team, first episode, October 6, 2000 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSI:_Crime_Scene_Investigation. Last accessed February 4, 2011).

  10. 10.

    From “Pilot” first broadcast October 6, 2000.

  11. 11.

    There is a vast literature on photographic truth. For a general discussion of the role of photography in law, see Feigenson and Spiesel (2009).

  12. 12.

    Color varies under different lighting conditions, hence, platonically inflected thinkers have long regarded color as unreliable compared to chiaroscuro, painting less reliable than drawing. The ­literature on this is large. Readers might try Gage (1993). Note that noir, meaning black, is a ­frequently used label for the whole class of crime fictions in various media, particularly arising from the dark lighting favored by filmmakers who created the genre.

  13. 13.

    Elaine Pagliaro interview—noting disappointment of students who sign up for forensics training when they discover that the forensics people are not the investigators at all.

  14. 14.

    Original air date—April 25, 2007.

  15. 15.

    Note that I have rendered the Tait quote gender neutral as heterosexual women viewers might well have the same enjoyment from the beautiful young men pictured dead.

  16. 16.

    See, for instance, Jeffrey Toobin’s article on hair and fiber evidence, “The CSI Effect,” Annals of Law, The New Yorker, May 07, 2007 at: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/05/07/070507fa_fact_toobin. For examples of coverage on other forensics problems, see Associated Press, “North Carolina: Crime Lab to Be Examined” March 5, 2010 at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/06/us/06brfs-CRIMELABTOBE_BRF.html?_r=1&ref=forensic_science; also Bob Herbert, “Innocent But Dead”, August 31, 2009 at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/opinion/01herbert.html?ref=forensic_science. All last accessed 8/4/2010CGI.

  17. 17.

    For the discussion of CSI in the NRC report, see pp. 47–48.

  18. 18.

    I am grateful to Dr. Sydney Z. Spiesel for his suggestion that collectives can engage in this process mirroring individual psychology (Spiesel 2008). For references in the Freud canon to this subject, see Laplanche and Pontalis (1973), 411.

  19. 19.

    There seems to be substantial agreement guesstimating that the plea-bargaining rates fall between 90 and 95% of all criminal cases. Established numbers for 2003 are in Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 426 tbl.5.24.

  20. 20.

    I am very grateful to Pamela Hobbs who initially suggested to me, in 2006, that I ought to explore the connections when I presented an earlier version of this chapter.

  21. 21.

    There is substantial agreement between authorities on this history. The most complete version can be found in Bartlett (1986). Other sources include John Langbein (2006), Pollack and Maitland (1968), Plunknett (1956).

  22. 22.

    For an extended discussion of the end of the ordeal and canon law, see McAuley (2006).

References

  • American Bar Association. 2010. 2010 ABA program book at: http://new.abanet.org/annual/pdfs/933926_Program_FINAL.pdf. Last accessed 14 Aug 2010.

  • Bartlett, Robert. 1986. Trial by fire and water, the medieval judicial ordeal. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Robert P. 1999. A theory of the trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Ben. 2000. Trial by ordeal? Polygraph testing in Australia. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 7. http://www.webcitation.org/5ex1t3QKF. Accessed 8 Aug 2010.

  • Cohn, Norman. 1975. Europe’s inner demons. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Simon A., and Rachel Dioso-Villa. 2009. Investigating the ‘CSI Effect’: Media and litigation crisis in criminal law. Stanford Law Review 61: 1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, Jonathan. 1999. Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos, John. 2008. The enemy within, 2000 years of witch-hunting in the western world. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Sarah Keturah, and Gray Cavender. 2008. CSI and forensic realism. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 15(1): 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominick, Joseph R. 1973. Crime and law enforcement on prime-time television. Public Opinion Quarterly 37(2): 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowler, Kenneth. 2003. Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 10(2): 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, Neal, and Christina Spiesel. 2009. Law on display, the digital transformation of legal persuasion and judgment. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, John. 1993. Color and culture. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gever, Martha. 2005. The spectacle of crime, digitized: CSI: crime scene investigation and social anatomy. European Journal of Cultural Studies 8: 446–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartney, Christopher. 2006. US rates of incarceration: A global perspective. Research from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, November 2006. http://www.nccd-crc.org/nccd/pubs/2006nov_factsheet_incarceration.pdf

  • Kim, Young S., et al. 2009. Examining the “CSI-Effect” in the cases of circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony: Multivariate and path analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice 37: 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmiller, Tammy et al. v Dover Area School District, et al. 2005. 400 F. Supp. cui 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronman, Anthony T. 1998. The Robert Mark Lecture, “Rhetoric,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 67 U. Cin. L. Rev. (1998–1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Jaron. 2010. The first church of robotics. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/opinion/09lanier.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=lanier&st=Search. Last accessed 12 Aug 2010.

  • Langbein, John H. 2006. Torture and the law of proof, Europe and England in the ancien regime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, John H., et al. 2009. History of the common law: The development of Anglo-American legal institutions. New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplanche, Jean, and Jean-Bertrant Pontalis. 1973. The language of psychoanalysis. London: Karnak Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2002. English translation by Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage. The making of law, an ethnography of the Conseil D’Etat. Cambridge, UK an Malden, MA: Polity Press. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattman, Peter. 2007. Justice Scalia hearts Jack Bauer. WSJ Law Blogs. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/06/20/justice-scalia-hearts-jack-bauer/tab/article/. Last accessed 8 Aug 2010.

  • Lavigne, Carlen. 2009. Death wore black chiffon: Sex and gender in CSI. Canadian Review of American Studies 39: 384–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tamara F. 2009. The verdict and beyond the verdict: The CSI infection within modern criminal jury trials. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 41: 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, Finbarr. 2006. Canon law and the end of the ordeal. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science, National Research Council, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community. 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf.

  • Nielson ratings: The 2007 statistics are drawn from a report: http://www.sfgate.com/tvradio/nielsens/. Accessed 9 Apr 2007. 2010 statistics are from http://en-us.nielsen.com/rankings/insights/rankings/television. Last accessed 30 Jan 2010.

  • Niman, Michael I. 2000. Incarceration nation. The U.S. is the world’s leading jailer. Buffalo Beat January 4th, 2000. http://mediastudy.com/articles/incarceration.html

  • Noble, David F. 1999. The religion of technology, the divinity of man and the spirit of invention. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunknett, Theodore F.T. 1956. A concise history of the common law, 5th ed. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlas, Kimberlianne. 2006. ‘The CSI Effect’: Exposing the media myth. Fordam Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 16: 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Sir Frederick, and Frederick William Maitland. 1968. The history of English law before the time of Edward I, 2nd ed. Vols. I and II. London, Cambridge U.P., 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple-Raston, Dina. 2009, December 19. National public radio report “Call for forensics overhaul linked to ‘CSI’ effect.” http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=100831831.

  • Rath, Arun. 2011. Is the ‘CSI Effect’ influencing courtrooms? http://www.npr.org/2011/02/06/133497696/is-the-csi-effect-influencing-courtrooms?sc=fb&cc=fp. Last accessed 6 Feb 2011.

  • Robbers, Monica L. 2008. Blinded by science: The social construction of reality in forensic television shows and its effect on criminal jury trials. Criminal Justice Policy Review 19(1): 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, Donald E. 2010. Juror expectations for scientific evidence in criminal cases: Perceptions and reality about the “CSI Effect” myth. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review 27(1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, Donald E., et al. 2006. A Study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: Does the ‘CSI Effect’ exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 2: 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiesel, Sydney Z. 2008. Unpublished lecture to the science, technology, Utopian visions working group of the Whitney Humanities Center, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, Aaron M. 2009. Absolute truth or dues ex machine?: The legal and philosophical ramifications of guilt-assessment technology. Journal of High Technology Law, 10 J. High Tech Law 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, Sue. 2006. Autoptic vision and the necrophilic imaginary in CSI. International Journal of Cultural Studies 9: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A.C. et al. 2011. The real ‘CSI’: How America’s patchwork system of death investigations puts the living at risk. http://www.propublica.org/article/the-real-csi-americas-patchwork-system-of-death-investigation. Last accessed 7 Feb 2011.

  • Todorov, Tzvetan. 2009. Torture and the war on terror. London: Seagull Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Viewing CSI and the threshold of guilt: Managing truth and justice in reality and fiction. The Yale Law Journal 115: 1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2003. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics 426 tbl.5.24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, John. 2003. Re military interrogation of alien unlawful combatants held outside the United States. http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/safefree/yoo_army_torture_memo.pdf. Last accessed 9 Aug 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina O. Spiesel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spiesel, C.O. (2014). Trial by Ordeal: CSI and the Rule of Law. In: Wagner, A., Sherwin, R. (eds) Law, Culture and Visual Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics