Abstract
Tribal sovereignty in the United States is consolidated and enacted in a plethora of physical spaces, within which tribes must establish both legitimacy and legality for their governance. In tension with this need, at times, is the need to simultaneously establish authenticity of tribal practices, perceptions of which may rest in an unreflecting view of these practices as premodern, prelegal, and historical – rather than mobile, adaptable, and contemporary engagements with contemporary life. However, the supposed binaries of modernity and tradition are much more complexly constructed and understood by tribal practitioners, than they have been by non-Indian observers. This essay examines the creative ways that tribal buildings and signs reflect and resolve the tensions perceived between modernity and indigeneity. Tribal semiotic practices construct legitimacy in ways that creatively avoid the false dichotomy between authenticity and modernity, and deploy multiple visual components to reassure a number of constituencies of their authentic claims to western legality and legitimacy, as well as distinctive tribal authority.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See, however, Richard Warren Perry’s 2006 work on differential spatial criminalization and gaming.
- 2.
Cattelino 234, note 12; citing Wilkins and Lomaiwaima.
- 3.
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Public Law 100-497 Sections 2701-2721; California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 480 U.S. 202 (1987).
- 4.
See the website for then National Indian Gaming Commission (www.nigc.gov) and the National Indian Gaming Association (www.niga.org); see also Light and Rand (2005), Mason (2000).
- 5.
See Duthu, page 52, quoting the Lummi Nation Tribal Court in Alvarado v. Warner-Lambert Company, 30 Indian L. Rep. 6174, 6177 (May 22, 2003), stating that the provision of health services is one such vital role.
- 6.
Cobell v. Salazar 573 F.3d 808 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
References
Anthes, William. 2008. Learning from Foxwoods: Visualizing the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. American Indian Quarterly 32(2): 204–218.
Basso, Keith H. 1996. Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Brigham, John. 2009. Material law: A jurisprudence of what’s real. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Caldwell, Quinn. 2010, January 4. Landscape. Daily devotional at http://www.ucc.org.
Casey, Edward S. 1996. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In Senses of place, ed. Steven Feld and Keith H. Basso. Albuquerque: School of American Research Press.
Cattelino, Jessica. 2008. High stakes: Florida Seminole gaming and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.
Coffey, Wallace, and Rebecca Tsosie. 2001. Rethinking the tribal sovereignty doctrine: Cultural sovereignty and the collective sovereignty of Indian nations. Stanford Law and Policy Review 12: 191.
Cramer, Renee. 2005. Cash, color and colonialism: The politics of tribal acknowledgment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Cramer, Renee. 2006. The ‘common sense’ of anti-Indian racism. Law & Social Inquiry 31(2): 314–341.
Cramer, Renee. 2009. Review of Arguing with tradition. Journal of Law, Culture, and the Humanities 5: 317–319.
Cruz, Christine Zuni. 1997. Strengthening what remains. Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 7: 17.
De Uriarte, John J.Bodinger. 2003. Imagining the nation with house odds: Representing American Indian identity at Mashantucket. Ethnohistory 50: 3.
Duthu, N.Bruce. 2008. American Indians and the law. New York: Penguin Group.
Feld, Steven, and Keith Basso. 1996. Senses of place. Albuquerque: School of American Research Press.
Hamilton, Jennifer A. 2009. Indigeneity in the courtroom: Law, culture, and the production of difference in North American Courts. New York: Routledge.
Kalt, Joseph P., and Joseph William Singer. 2004. Myths and realities of tribal sovereignty: the law and economics of tribal self-rule. Paper presented at Native Issues Research Symposium, Harvard University. www.ksg.harvard.edu/hunap
Kersey, Harry A. 1996. An assumption of sovereignty: Social and political transformation among the Florida Seminoles, 1953–1979. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Light, Steven Andrew, and Kathryn R.L. Rand. 2005. Indian gaming and tribal sovereignty: The casino compromise. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Marusek, Sarah. 2005. Wheelchair as Semiotic: Space governance of the American handicapped parking space. Law/Text/Culture 9: 178.
Mason, Dale. 2000. Indian gaming: Tribal sovereignty and American politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Pommersheim, Frank. 1997. Braid of feathers: American Indian law and contemporary tribal life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pommersheim, Frank. 2009. Broken landscape: Indians, Indian Tribes, and the constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Porter, Robert. 1997. Strengthening tribal sovereignty through peacemaking: How the Anglo-American legal tradition destroys indigenous societies. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 20: 235–304.
Raibmon, Paige. 2005. Authentic Indians: Episodes of encounter from the late-nineteenth-century northwest coast. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
Richland, Justin. 2008. Arguing with tradition: The language of law in Hopi Tribal court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rose, Nikolas, and Mariana Valverde. 1998. Governed by law? Social and Legal Studies 7(4): 541–551.
Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment. 2006a. Untitled promotional video, www.seminolerocks.com
Tsosie, Rebecca. 2002. Symposium on cultural sovereignty: Native rights in the twenty-first century – Introduction. Arizona State Law Journal 34: 1–14.
Vincenti, Carey N. 1995. The reemergence of tribal society and traditional justice systems. Judicature 79: 134.
Wilkins, David E., and K. Tsianina Lomawaima. 2002. Uneven ground: American Indian sovereignty and federal law. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cramer, R.A. (2014). Signs at Odds? The Semiotics of Law, Legitimacy, and Authenticity in Tribal Contexts. In: Wagner, A., Sherwin, R. (eds) Law, Culture and Visual Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9321-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9322-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)