Abstract
Courts in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand are increasingly entertaining claims for invasions of privacy. Many of these cases involve the publication of photographs by a media outlet. In the United Kingdom in particular, the means of protecting personal privacy has been the adaptation of the existing, information-based cause of action for breach of confidence. This has entailed treating photographs as a form of information. This chapter analyses the imposition of liability for the publication of intrusive photographs, as it is developing in the United Kingdom. It applies critical insights from leading theorists on photography, such as Barthes, Berger and Sontag, to suggest that the judicial treatment of photography is underdeveloped.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See also Creation Records Ltd v News Group Newspapers Ltd (1997).
References
Cases
A v. B plc (2003) QB 195.
Attorney-General v. Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (1990) 1 AC 109.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v. Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199.
Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v. Ettingshausen (unreported, CA(NSW), Gleeson CJ, Kirby P and Clarke JA, 13 October 1993).
Bathurst City Council v. Saban (1985) 2 NSWLR 704.
Bernstein v. Skyviews & General Ltd (1978) QB 479.
Campbell v. MGN Ltd (2004) 2 AC 457.
Coco v. AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd (1969) RPC 41.
Creation Records Ltd v. News Group Newspapers Ltd (1997) 39 IPR 1.
Cruise v. Southdown Press Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 125.
Douglas v. Hello! Ltd (2001) QB 967.
Douglas v. Hello! Ltd (No 3) (2003) 1 All ER 1087.
Douglas v. Hello! Ltd (No 3) (2006) QB 125.
Entick v. Carrington (1765) 19 State Tr 1030.
Giller v. Procopets (2008) 79 IPR 489.
GS v. News Ltd (1998) Aust Torts Reports 81-466.
Hellewell v. Chief Constable of Derbyshire (1995) 1 WLR 804.
John v. Associated Newspapers Ltd (2006) EMLR 27.
Kaye v. Robertson (1991) FSR 62.
Lincoln Hunt (Australia) Pty Ltd v. Willesee (1986) 4 NSWLR 457.
Mosley v. News Group Newspapers Ltd (2008) EMLR 679.
Murray v. Express Newspapers plc (2009) Ch 481.
OBG Ltd v. Allan (2008) 1 AC 1.
Raciti v. Hughes (1995) 7 BPR 14,837.
Seven Network (Australia) Operations Ltd v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2007) NSWSC 1289.
Slim v. Daily Telegraph Ltd (1968) 2 QB 157.
Smith v. R (2001) 206 CLR 650.
Theakston v. MGN Ltd (2002) EMLR 22.
Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Pty Ltd v. Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479.
Von Hannover v. Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1.
Wainwright v. Home Office (2004) 2 AC 406.
Books
Barthes, Roland. 1982. Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. Trans. Richard Howard, and Jonathan Cape. New York: Hill & Wang.
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.
Berger, John, and Jean Mohr. 1982. Another way of telling. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Society Ltd.
Biber, Katherine. 2007. Captive images: Race, crime and photography. Abingdon (Oxon): Routledge-Cavendish.
Clarke, Graham. 1997. The photograph. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Price, Mary. 1994. The photograph: A strange, confined space. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sontag, Susan. 1977. On photography. Ringwood: Penguin.
Book Chapters
Barthes, Roland. 1977a. The photographic message. In Image, music, text. Trans. Stephen Heath, 15–31. London: Flamingo.
Barthes, Roland. 1977b. The rhetoric of the image. In Image, music, text. Trans. Stephen Heath, 32–51. London: Flamingo.
Berger, John. 1971. Understanding a photography. In The look of things: Essays by John Berger, ed. Nikos Stangos, 178–182. New York: Viking.
Burgin, Victor. 1982. Looking at photographs. In Thinking photography, ed. Victor Burgin, 142–153. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Eco, Umberto. 1982. Critique of the image. In Thinking photography, ed. Victor Burgin, 32–38. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Price, Derrick, and Liz Wells. 2004. Thinking about photography: Debates, historically and now. In Photography: A critical introduction, ed. Liz Wells, 9–63. London: Routledge.
Rolph, David. 2010. The mechanical eye: Looking, seeing, photographing, publishing. In Courting the media: Contemporary perspectives on media and the law, ed. Sykes Geoffrey. New York: Nova Publishers.
Journal Articles
Sherwin Richard, K., Neal Feigenson, and Christina Spiesel. 2006. Law in the digital age: How visual communication technologies are transforming the theory, practice and teaching of law. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 12: 227.
Silbey, Jessica. 2010. Evidence verite and the law of film. Cardozo Law Review 31: 1257.
Reports
Australian Law Reform Commission. 2008. For your information: Australian privacy law and practice. Canberra: Australian Law Reform Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rolph, D. (2014). Looking Again at Photographs and Privacy: Theoretical Perspectives on Law’s Treatment of Photographs as Invasions of Privacy. In: Wagner, A., Sherwin, R. (eds) Law, Culture and Visual Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9322-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9321-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9322-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)