Skip to main content

Perception as a Source of Justification of Belief

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing Phenomenology

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 62))

  • 960 Accesses

Abstract

Most contemporary theories of the justification of empirical belief have ruled out sensory perception as a source of justification. The arguments favoring this position, however, have not sufficiently addressed the central points that Husserl has made in support of his claim that sensory perception is a source of justification. Husserl’s discussion undermines one of the main arguments used to deny perception an originating role, namely the argument whose grounds are the epistemic regress problem. When the phenomenological analyses which Husserl uses to support his position are extended beyond the point to which he developed them in order to bring out the role of future time-consciousness in verification, as this article does, there results an approach to epistemic justification which has promise as a rival to the coherentist and naturalistic theories that have become prevalent in recent times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Laurence Bonjour, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985). This work will subsequently be referred to in the body of the text as “SK.”

  2. 2.

    Edmund Husserl, Analysen zur passiven Synthesis, Husserliana XI (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966), p. 96.

  3. 3.

    Edmund Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic, tr. Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969), pp.122–29. This work will subsequently be referred to in the body of the text as “FTL”.

  4. 4.

    Edmund Husserl, Experience and Judgment, tr. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. 198. This work will subsequently be referred to in the body of the text as “EJ.”

  5. 5.

    Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations, tr. Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960), p. 61. This work will subsequently be referred to in the body of the text as “CM.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William McKenna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKenna, W. (2010). Perception as a Source of Justification of Belief. In: Nenon, T., Blosser, P. (eds) Advancing Phenomenology. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9286-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics