Skip to main content

Defenders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Academic Units in a Complex, Changing World
  • 345 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides case studies of units that used a defender mode of adaptation. These academic units had entrenched institutional norms; this meant that they chose to adapt by continuing their traditional operations. Stability, caution and order were the dominant values for these units. The key objective for academic units that used a defensive mode of adaptation was to attain greater efficiency from their current teaching, research and administration activities. Entrepreneurial activities were limited. Defenders concentrated on generating independent revenue (non-government) from established markets, such as tuition fees, from international and postgraduate students rather than undertaking less traditional and higher risk entrepreneurial activities, such as commercial research partnerships, or consultancy work, as prospectors did. Defenders displayed an inward/past orientation; they tended to ignore external environmental changes that did not directly impact upon their current operations. These units had a vertical hierarchical organisational structure; committees, and working parties made decisions in a manner that was slow, bureaucratic and resource intensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Ithaca, NY: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilding, M. (2004). Entrepreneurs, elites and the ruling class: The changing structure of power and wealth in Australian society. Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N. J. (2004). Expertise as privilege: Australian legal education and the persistent emphasis upon doctrine. University of Western Sydney Law Review. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.austlii.org/au/journals/UWSLRev/2004/1.html

  • Parker, C., & Goldsmith, A. (1998). ‘Failed sociologists' in the market place: Law schools in Australia. Journal of Law & Society, 25(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanna de Zilwa .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Zilwa, D. (2010). Defenders. In: Academic Units in a Complex, Changing World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9237-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics