Advertisement

The Development of a New Means of Representation: Goals and Milestones

  • Adrian WüthrichEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 26)

Abstract

Two of the principal aims of this study were to reconstruct the route that led Feynman, between approximately 1946 and 1948, to devise his new method of diagrams and to evaluate what was achieved. In the preceding sections I showed how Feynman developed his diagrams in a series of comprehensible steps, and that his primary consideration was to solve important theoretical problems of the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) as it then stood. This goal was finally achieved to a satisfactory extent by Freeman J. Dyson’s systematization of Feynman’s results.

Keywords

Closed Loop Dirac Equation Feynman Diagram Symbol System Classical Electrodynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Dirac Equation b. (Ca. 1946). Second series of selected folios from Box 11, Folder 2.Google Scholar
  2. Dirac Equation h. (Ca. 1947). Eighth series of selected folios from Box 11, Folder 2.Google Scholar
  3. Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics. (Ca. 1947). Series of selected folios from Box 12, Folder 9.Google Scholar
  4. Bopp, F. (1940). ‘Eine lineare Theorie des Elektrons’. In: Annalen der Physik 38, pp. 345–384.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bopp, F. (1942). ‘Lineare Theorie des Elektrons. II’. In: Annalen der Physik 42, pp. 573–608.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Breit, G. (1928). ‘An Interpretation of Dirac’s Theory of the Electron’. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 14.7, pp. 553–559.Google Scholar
  7. Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). ‘A Theory of Electrons and Protons’. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 126.801, pp. 360–365.Google Scholar
  9. Dirac, P. A. M. (1935). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics by P. A. M. Dirac. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dyson, F. J. (1965). ‘Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman Awarded Nobel Prize for Physics’. In: Science. 3rd ser. 150.3696 (Oct. 1965), pp. 588–589.Google Scholar
  11. Feynman, R. P. (1949). ‘The Theory of Positrons’. In: Physical Review 76.6 (Sept. 1949), pp. 749–759.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feynman, R. P. (1966). ‘The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics’. In: Science 153.3737. Nobel lecture, pp. 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galison, P. (1998). ‘Feynman’s War: Modelling Weapons, Modelling Nature’. In: Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29.3 (Sept. 1998), pp. 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giere, R. N. (1996). ‘Visual Models and Scientific Judgement’. In: Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Ed. by B. Baigrie. Toronto, ON University of Toronto Press, pp. 267–302.Google Scholar
  15. McManus, H. (1948). ‘Classical Electrodynamics without Singularities’. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 195.1042, pp. 323–336.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Schweber, S. S. (1986a). ‘Feynman and the Visualization of Space-Time Processes’. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 58.2, pp. 449–508.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schweber, S. S. (1994). QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton: Princeton University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Wheeler, J. A. and R. P. Feynman (1945). ‘Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation’. In: Reviews of Modern Physics 17.2–3 (Apr. 1945), pp. 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schrödinger, E. (1930). ‘Über die kräftefreie Bewegung in der relativistischen Quantenmechanik’. In: Sonderausgabe aus den Sitzungsberichten der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phys. Math. Klasse 24. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie derWissenschaften in Kommission beiWalter de Gruyter u. Co. Reprinted in Schrödinger 1984, pp. 357–368, 418–428.Google Scholar
  20. Weiner, C. (1966a). ‘Interview with Dr. Richard Feynman, March 4 to June 28, 1966, Vol. 2’. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bern, History and Philosophy of Science, Exact SciencesBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations