Skip to main content

Agonistic Engagements: Difference, Meaning and Deliberation in South African Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1304 Accesses

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 26))

Abstract

Development policies and city planning models that are informed by the modernist utopian ideal still inform formalisation practices in developing countries. These practises have unintended consequences that contribute to the proliferation of poverty and inhumane living conditions. By exploring new ways of thinking and adopting planning and development models that are sensitive to the complexity of people's lived experiences in informal settlements, new public discourses are given the opportunity to emerge. Processes and discourses that adopt practices of “agonistic engagement” offer a means of interaction that is a pre-requisite for rebuilding utopian thinking as an authentic source of inspiration in communities characterised by complexity and difference. Mediated modelling techniques as implemented by organisations such as Stalker allow for development practices that are sensitive to the diversity of voices found in informal settlements. Inspired by practices of transgressive dialogical engagements, development policies might bring about sustainable social change that will benefit vulnerable communities. Case studies of communities in the Western Cape (South Africa) serve to highlight the consequences of interventions that implement rigid development planning policies that aim at reducing and cleaning up "messy spaces". The failures of such policies are highlighted. Research and modelling methods are explored that offer new and creative ways of understanding space in terms of the lived experience of the communities themselves. The case studies aim to elucidate the ethical importance of development interventions that advocate contextually rooted change. A process of opening up deliberative spaces for dialogue informs such interventions in which complexity and difference can be negotiated authentically.

Agonistic politics seeks to advance radical democracy by highlighting and challenging the limits of “the possible”.

Edgar Pieterse, 2006

Dissenting voices receive no special privilege; they have to enter into the ‘agonistics of the network’, where their relevance is dynamically determined through competition and co-operation in terms of the history as well as the changing needs and goals of the system.

Paul Cilliers, 1998

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Bekker and Leilde 2006, Pieterse 2008, Mbembe 2002, Simone 2004a, Simone and Abouhani 2005, Swilling et al. 2003.

  2. 2.

    See Ambert and Feldman 2002, Berresford and Kohato 2008, Harrison 2008, Muller, 2006, Unpublished

  3. 3.

    This is the slogan of the Western Cape Provincial Government

  4. 4.

    For a review of the local government context see Van Donk et al. 2008.

  5. 5.

    For overviews see Southall (2006, 2007)

  6. 6.

    “Roll out” being one of the most oft used and abused phrase amongst government officials since 1994.

  7. 7.

    See Simone (2001, 2004a), Simone and Abouhani (2005), Swilling et al. (2003)

  8. 8.

    Mbembe (2002), Swilling et al. (2003).

  9. 9.

    NIMBY = “Not in my back yard”

  10. 10.

    Mbembe and Nuttall (2004), Robins (2006), Pieterse (2005), Simone (2004b, 2001, 2006), Swilling et al. (2003)

  11. 11.

    Harrison et al. (2003, 2008), Khan and Thring (2003), Van Donk et al. (2008)

  12. 12.

    Greenfields means a development on land that had not been previously developed

  13. 13.

    There is no space to go into this vast and complicated story, but the deliberate restraint on public debate about housing policy during the years 1992–1996 are derived from two post-graduate theses supervised by Mark Swilling, namely: Rust, 1998, Civil society participation in the housing process, 1991–1996. Masters in Management, Unpublished Also: Khan (2008).

  14. 14.

    See De Boeck and Plissart (2005) on the “invisible within cities” and Simone (2006) on pirate spaces.

  15. 15.

    Heterotopias are defined as places where differences meet

References

  • Ambert, C. and Feldman, M. 2002. Are IDPs barking up the wrong tree? A story of planning, budgeting, alignment and decentralisation. South African planning institution, planning Africa conference 2002. Durban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, J. and Sobreira, F. 2002. City of Slums: Self-organisation across scales. Nashua, NH, USA: International Conference on Complex Systems. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London. Working Paper 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, S. and Leilde, A. 2006. Reflections on identity in four African cities. Cape Town: African Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berresford, S. and Kohato, M. 2008. Local government planning legal frameworks and regulatory tools: Vital signs? In M.Van Donk, M. Swilling, E. Pieterse & S. Parnell (eds.), Consolidating developmental local government: Lessons from the South African experience. Cape Town, University of Cape Town Press, pp. 377–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 2001. Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5 (2): 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boeck, F. and Plissart, M.F. 2005. Kinshasa: Recits de la ville invisible. Brussels: La Renaissance du Livre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, D. 1997. The housing issue in South Africa. In H. Tilman (ed.), Integration of fragmentation: The housing generator competition for South African cities. Rotterdam: Academie van Bouwkunst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. 2000. The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (2): 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. 2008. The origins and outcomes of South Africa’s integrated development plans. In M. Van Donk, M. Swilling, E. Pieterse & S. Parnell (eds.), Consolidating developmental local government: Lessons from the South African experience. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press, pp. 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Huchzermeyer, M. and Mayekiso, M. (eds.) 2003. Confronting fragmentation: Housing and urban development in a democratising society. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Todes, A. and Watson, V. 2008. Planning and transformation: Learning from the post-apartheid experience. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holston, J. 1998. Spaces of insurgent citizenship. In L. Sandercock (ed.), Making the invisible visible. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karen, A., Stevens, F. and Stevens, Q. (eds.) 2007. Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. 2008. Political economy of housing policy in South Africa, 1994–2004. Phd Thesis School of Public Management and Planning. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. and Thring, P. 2003. Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Cape Town: Heinneman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P.T. 2007. Stalker on location. In K.A. Franck and Q. Stevens (eds.), Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, T. 2003. Politics in South Africa: Form Mandela to Mbeki. London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. 2002. African modes of self-writing. Public Culture,14: 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. and Nuttall, S. 2004. Johannesburg: The elusive metropolis. Public Culture, 16 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, E. 2005. At the limits of possibility: Working notes on a relational model of urban politics. In M. Simone and A. Abouhani (eds.), Urban Africa: Changing contours of survival in the city. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, E. 2006. Building ruins and dreams: Exploratory thoughts on realising integrated urban develoment through crises. Urban Studies, 43 (2): 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, E. 2008. City futures. Cape Town: Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, S. 2006. When shacks ain’t chic! planning for ‘difference’ in post-apartheid Cape Town. In S. Bekker and A. Leilde (eds.), Reflections on identity in fourh African cities. Cape Town: African Minds, pp. 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. 2005. Urban informality: Towards an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71 (2): 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. 1999. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. 2001. Between Ghetto and Globe: Remaking urban life in Africa. In A. Tostensen, I. Tvedten and M. Vaa (eds.), Associational life in African cities: Popular responses to the urban crisis. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. 2004a. For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. 2004b. People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johanneburg. Public Culture, 16 (3): 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. 2006. Pirate towns: Reworking social and symbolic infrastructures in Johannesburg and Douala. Urban Studies, 43 (2): 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone, A. and Abouhani, A. (eds.) 2005. Urban Africa: Changing contours of survival in the city. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, W. 2000. The impact of the transition from informal housing to formalized housing in low-income housing projects in South Africa. Copenhagen: Nordic Africa Institution Conference on the Formal and Informal City – What Happens at the Interface? 15–18 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, W. 2006. Understanding the complexities of informal settlements: Insights from Cape Town. In M. Huchzermeyer and A. Karam (eds.), Informal settlements: A perpetual challenge? Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall, R. 2006. Introduction: Can South Africa be a developmental state?. In S. Buhlungu, J. Daniel, R. Southall & J. Lutchman (eds.), State of the nation: South Africa, 2005–2006. Cape Town: HSRC Press, pp. xvii–xliv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall, R. 2007. The ANC state, more dysfunctional than developmental?. In S. Buhlungu, J. Daniel, R. Southall & J. Lutchman (eds.), State of the nation: South Africa 2006–2007. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalkers. 2008. Stalker through the actual territories. [Online]: http://digilander.liberto.it/stalkerlab/tarkowsky/manifesto/manifesting/htm [20 June 2008].

  • Stavrides, S. 2007. Heterotopias and the experience of porous urban spaces. In A. Karen, F. Stevens and Q. Stevens (eds.), Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, M. 1999. Rival futures. In H. Judin and I. Vladislavic. (eds.), Blank: Architecture, apartheid and after. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, M., Khan, F. and Simone, A. 2003. ‘My soul i can see’: The limits of governing African cities in a context of globalisation and complexity. In P. Mccarney and R. Stren (eds.), Governance on the ground: Innovations and discontinuities in cities of the developing world. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, pp. 220–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostensen, A., Tvedten, I. and Vaa, M. (eds.) 2001. Associational life in African cities: Popular responses to the urban crisis. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprichard, E. and Byrne, D. 2006. Representing complex places: A narrative approach. Environment and Planning , 38: 665–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Belt, M. 2004. Mediated modelling: A systems dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington, DC: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Donk, M., Swilling, M., Pieterse, E. and Parnell, S. (eds.) 2008. Consolidating developmental local government: Lessons from the South African experience. Cape Town: Isandla Institute and University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, P. 2007. Public-sector transformation in South Africa. Progress in Development Studies, 7 (1): 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Swilling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swilling, M., Roux, P., Guyot, A. (2010). Agonistic Engagements: Difference, Meaning and Deliberation in South African Cities. In: Cilliers, P., Preiser, R. (eds) Complexity, Difference and Identity. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9187-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics